Decision Criterion Dynamics in Animals Performing an Auditory Detection Task

Classical signal detection theory attributes bias in perceptual decisions to a threshold criterion, against which sensory excitation is compared. The optimal criterion setting depends on the signal level, which may vary over time, and about which the subject is naïve. Consequently, the subject must optimise its threshold by responding appropriately to feedback. Here a series of experiments was conducted, and a computational model applied, to determine how the decision bias of the ferret in an auditory signal detection task tracks changes in the stimulus level. The time scales of criterion dynamics were investigated by means of a yes-no signal-in-noise detection task, in which trials were grouped into blocks that alternately contained easy- and hard-to-detect signals. The responses of the ferrets implied both long- and short-term criterion dynamics. The animals exhibited a bias in favour of responding “yes” during blocks of harder trials, and vice versa. Moreover, the outcome of each single trial had a strong influence on the decision at the next trial. We demonstrate that the single-trial and block-level changes in bias are a manifestation of the same criterion update policy by fitting a model, in which the criterion is shifted by fixed amounts according to the outcome of the previous trial and decays strongly towards a resting value. The apparent block-level stabilisation of bias arises as the probabilities of outcomes and shifts on single trials mutually interact to establish equilibrium. To gain an intuition into how stable criterion distributions arise from specific parameter sets we develop a Markov model which accounts for the dynamic effects of criterion shifts. Our approach provides a framework for investigating the dynamics of decisions at different timescales in other species (e.g., humans) and in other psychological domains (e.g., vision, memory).

[1]  W. S. Verplanck,et al.  Previous training as a determinant of response dependency at the threshold. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[3]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[4]  Robert C. Wilson,et al.  An Approximately Bayesian Delta-Rule Model Explains the Dynamics of Belief Updating in a Changing Environment , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[6]  M. Treisman,et al.  American Psychological Association, Inc, A Theory of Criterion Setting With an Application to Sequential Dependencies , 2022 .

[7]  M. Carandini,et al.  Probing perceptual decisions in rodents , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Anthony D. Whalen Chapter 6 – Detection of Known Signals , 1971 .

[9]  K. Doya,et al.  The computational neurobiology of learning and reward , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[10]  D. M. Green,et al.  CONSISTENCY OF AUDITORY DETECTION JUDGMENTS. , 1963, Psychology Review.

[11]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Optimal reward harvesting in complex perceptual environments , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Ewart A. C. Thomas Criterion adjustment and probability matching , 1975 .

[14]  Pete R. Jones Mechanisms of auditory perceptual learning , 2013 .

[15]  Martin H. Hack Signal Detection in the Rat , 1963, Science.

[16]  Joshua I. Gold,et al.  A Mixture of Delta-Rules Approximation to Bayesian Inference in Change-Point Problems , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[18]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Learning the value of information in an uncertain world , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Christoph Rasche,et al.  Perceptual learning in contrast detection: presence and cost of shifts in response criteria , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  B. Alsop Receiver operating characteristics from nonhuman animals: Some implications and directions for research with humans , 1998 .

[21]  O. Güntürkün,et al.  Adaptive criterion setting in perceptual decision making. , 2011, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[22]  S. Fernberger Interdependence of judgments within the series for the method of constant stimuli. , 1920 .

[23]  H. Marston,et al.  Analysis of cognitive function in animals, the value of SDT. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  Carl F Saslow,et al.  Learning models for a continuum of sensory states reexamined , 1975 .

[25]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[26]  P. Latham,et al.  Ruling out and ruling in neural codes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  W. Newsome,et al.  Matching Behavior and the Representation of Value in the Parietal Cortex , 2004, Science.

[28]  G. Gerstein,et al.  A signal detection analysis of auditory-frequency discrimination in the rat. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  A. Alves-Pinto,et al.  Signal detection in animal psychoacoustics: Analysis and simulation of sensory and decision-related influences , 2012, Neuroscience.

[30]  Ingo Fründ,et al.  Inference for psychometric functions in the presence of nonstationary behavior. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[31]  Mark Kac,et al.  A note on learning signal detection , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[32]  C. Gallistel,et al.  The rat approximates an ideal detector of changes in rates of reward: implications for the law of effect. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[33]  B. Clopton Detection of increments in noise intensity by monkeys. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  Bingni W. Brunton,et al.  Rats and Humans Can Optimally Accumulate Evidence for Decision-Making , 2013, Science.

[35]  H. Seung,et al.  JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR 2005, 84, 581–617 NUMBER 3(NOVEMBER) LINEAR-NONLINEAR-POISSON MODELS OF PRIMATE CHOICE DYNAMICS , 2022 .

[36]  Andrew D. Zaharia,et al.  The Detection of Visual Contrast in the Behaving Mouse , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[37]  D. Blough Some contributions of signal detection theory to the analysis of stimulus control in animals , 2001, Behavioural Processes.

[38]  D. Barraclough,et al.  Prefrontal cortex and decision making in a mixed-strategy game , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  W M Baum,et al.  Optimization and the matching law as accounts of instrumental behavior. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[40]  S. Klein,et al.  Measuring, estimating, and understanding the psychometric function: A commentary , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  D S Blough,et al.  Stimulus Generalization as Signal Detection in Pigeons , 1967, Science.

[42]  Donald D. Dorfman,et al.  A learning model for a continuum of sensory states , 1971 .