The effects of spatial stimulus-response compatibility on choice time production accuracy and variability.

Five experiments examined the relations between timing and attention using a choice time production task in which the latency of a spatial choice response is matched to a target interval (3 or 5 s). Experiments 1 and 2 indicated that spatial stimulus-response incompatibility increased nonscalar timing variability without affecting timing accuracy and that choice reaction time practice reduced choice time production variability. These data support a "temporal discounting" model in which response choice and timing occur in series, but the interval timed is shortened to account for nontemporal processing. In Experiment 3, feedback and anticipation task demands improved choice time production accuracy. In Experiments 4 and 5, the delay between the start-timing and choice-decision signals interacted with choice difficulty to affect choice time production accuracy and variability when timing a 3- but not a 5-s interval, suggesting that attention mediates timing before and after an interruption in timing.

[1]  R. E. Hicks,et al.  Prospective and retrospective judgments of time as a function of amount of information processed. , 1976, The American journal of psychology.

[2]  H. Lejeune Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  R. Proctor,et al.  Do the same stimulus-response relations influence choice reactions initially and after practice? , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Catalin V Buhusi,et al.  Temporal integration as a function of signal and gap intensity in rats (Rattus norvegicus) and pigeons (Columba livia). , 2002, Journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[7]  P. Fitts,et al.  S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  W H Meck,et al.  Paying Attention to Time as one Gets Older , 2001, Psychological science.

[9]  V Pouthas,et al.  Timing in aging: the role of attention. , 1999, Experimental aging research.

[10]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of Perception and Human Performance. Volume 2. Cognitive Processes and Performance , 1994 .

[11]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Human bisection at the geometric mean , 1991 .

[12]  R M Church,et al.  Scalar Timing in Memory , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  S. W. Brown,et al.  Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  R. Rousseau,et al.  Time estimation and concurrent nontemporal processing: Specific interference from short-term-memory demands , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  W H Teichner,et al.  Laws of visual choice reaction time. , 1974, Psychological review.

[17]  Addie Dutta,et al.  Persistence of stimulus-response compatibility effects with extended practice. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[18]  W. Meck Attentional Bias between Modalities: Effect on the Internal Clock, Memory, and Decision Stages Used in Animal Time Discrimination a , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[19]  W. Meck,et al.  Dissecting the Brain's Internal Clock: How Frontal–Striatal Circuitry Keeps Time and Shifts Attention , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[21]  S. Iversen Motor control , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  Claudette Fortin,et al.  Attentional Time-Sharing in Interval Timing , 2003 .

[23]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Decision and Response in Dual-Task Interference , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  W. Meck Selective adjustment of the speed of internal clock and memory processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[25]  C Fortin,et al.  Expecting a break in time estimation: attentional time-sharing without concurrent processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  John H. Wearden,et al.  Interval production as an analogue of the peak procedure: Evidence for similarity of human and animal timing processes , 1988 .

[27]  M. Treisman Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock". , 1963, Psychological monographs.

[28]  C Fortin,et al.  Temporal interval production and processing in working memory , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  F. Macar,et al.  Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Françoise Macar,et al.  Temporal judgments on intervals containing stimuli of varying quantity, complexity and periodicity , 1996 .

[31]  Sylvie Droit-Volet,et al.  Relationships Between Age-Related Changes in Time Estimation and Age-Related Changes in Processing Speed, Attention, and Memory , 2002 .

[32]  F. Macar,et al.  Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Alfred B. Kristofferson,et al.  Low-variance stimulus-response latencies: Deterministic internal delays? , 1976 .

[34]  R. Ivry,et al.  Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  David J. Getty,et al.  Discrimination of short temporal intervals: A comparison of two models , 1975 .

[36]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Scott W. Brown Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[38]  J. Gibbon Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. , 1977 .

[39]  Warren H. Meck,et al.  Chronic treatment with haloperidol induces deficits in working memory and feedback effects of interval timing , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[40]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Scalar expectancy theory and peak-interval timing in humans. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[41]  Lucinda Mcclain,et al.  Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Toward a neurobiology of temporal cognition: advances and challenges , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[43]  R. Proctor,et al.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[44]  J T Mordkoff,et al.  Temporal stimulus-response compatibility. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  R. L. Deininger,et al.  S-R compatibility: correspondence among paired elements within stimulus and response codes. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  Yaakov Stern,et al.  The effects of aging on time reproduction in delayed free-recall , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[47]  D. Nitzan,et al.  The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  W. Meck Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing , 2003 .

[49]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[50]  Warren H. Meck,et al.  Modality-specific circadian rhythmicities influence mechanisms of attention and memory for interval timing , 1991 .

[51]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[52]  B Burle,et al.  Dissociation between activation and attention effects in time estimation: implications for internal clock models. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.