A MILP approach for optimal storage vessels layout based on the quantitative risk analysis methodology

Abstract The layout design for storage vessels is an important issue to keep safe process plants, since the accidents originated in storage areas are almost one-third of all reported accidents. In order to reduce fire and explosion damages different mathematical approaches have been proposed; however, most of them are not suitable for real storage facilities design. In this work, a MILP approach has been developed to find the optimal layout of storage vessels, seeking to minimize the cost associated with potential damage of fire and explosion. This approach allows allocation of suitable sites for storage vessels, reducing accidents propagation, and domino effect while keeping safety as much as possible the plant assets. In this way, the optimization approach provides substantial support for decision-makers during the design stage. The study case used to test the mathematical model considers 19 vessels, six buildings, five process facilities and 25 possible scenarios, which includes 16 fires and 9 explosions.

[1]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[2]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Assessment of domino effect: State of the art and research Needs , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Jiang Juncheng,et al.  An improved probit method for assessment of domino effect to chemical process equipment caused by overpressure. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Thresholds for domino effects and safety distances in the process industry: A review of approaches and regulations , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Lazaros G. Papageorgiou,et al.  An MILP Approach to Safe Process Plant Layout , 2004 .

[6]  C. Pietersen,et al.  Analysis of the LPG-disaster in mexico city , 1988 .

[7]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  Ccps Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[9]  Debra Simecek-Beatty,et al.  ALOHA® (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) 5.4.4 : technical documentation , 2013 .

[10]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Domino Effect Analysis Using Bayesian Networks , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  A MINLP approach for layout designs based on the domino hazard index , 2014 .

[12]  R. Burkard Quadratic Assignment Problems , 1984 .

[13]  Ccps Guidelines for Facility Siting and Layout , 2003 .

[14]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A mathematical programming model for optimal layout considering quantitative risk analysis , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  Frank Pearson Lees,et al.  Loss prevention in the process industries : hazard identification, assessment, and control , 1980 .

[16]  M. Sam Mannan,et al.  An approach for domino effect reduction based on optimal layouts , 2013 .

[17]  Esteban J. Bernechea,et al.  Design optimization of hazardous substance storage facilities to minimize project risk , 2013 .

[18]  Josep Arnaldos,et al.  A model for estimating the impact of the domino effect on accident frequencies in quantitative risk assessments of storage facilities , 2013 .

[19]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[20]  Josep Arnaldos,et al.  Optimizing the design of storage facilities through the application of ISD and QRA , 2014 .

[21]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 2-Domino Hazard Index and case study. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[22]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications , 2001 .

[23]  T. Koopmans,et al.  Assignment Problems and the Location of Economic Activities , 1957 .

[24]  Rrk Sharma,et al.  A review of different approaches to the facility layout problems , 2006 .

[25]  A. R. Ciric,et al.  An MINLP Approach for Safe Process Plant Layout , 1996 .

[26]  Henri Pierreval,et al.  Facility layout problems: A survey , 2007, Annu. Rev. Control..

[27]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  Safety assessment in plant layout design using indexing approach: implementing inherent safety perspective. Part 1 - guideword applicability and method description. , 2008, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  Dedy Ng,et al.  New Approach To Optimizing the Facility Siting and Layout for Fire and Explosion Scenarios , 2011 .

[29]  Warren P. Adams,et al.  Improved Linear Programming-based Lower Bounds for the Quadratic Assignment Proglem , 1993, Quadratic Assignment and Related Problems.

[30]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Special Issue: Domino effects in the process industry - Advancing the state of the art , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..