Supplementing quantitative risk assessments with a stage addressing the risk understanding of the decision maker

Abstract A quantitative probabilistic risk assessment produces a conditional risk description given the knowledge of the analysts (formulated to a large extent through assumptions). However, important aspects of the risk may be concealed in the background knowledge of the analyst and the assumptions. This paper discusses this issue, the main purpose being to present a two-stage risk assessment approach where the second stage addresses the risk understanding of the decision maker. This second-stage is to a large extent qualitative. The approach is novel with its separation between the analysts׳ conditional risk descriptions using probability judgments, and the decision maker׳s risk understanding. The approach aims at improving the use of risk assessment in practical decision making by ensuring that the results of the risk assessments are properly interpreted and the key aspects of risk, uncertainty and knowledge are brought to attention for the decision makers. Examples are used to illustrate the approach.

[1]  Ortwin Renn Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World , 2008 .

[2]  Enrico Zio,et al.  An Introduction to the Basics of Reliability and Risk Analysis , 2007 .

[3]  T. Aven,et al.  Concerns, Challenges, and Directions of Development for the Issue of Representing Uncertainty in Risk Assessment , 2014, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[4]  Steve Epstein,et al.  Can we trust PRA? , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Didier Dubois,et al.  Representation, Propagation, and Decision Issues in Risk Analysis Under Incomplete Probabilistic Information , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[6]  Emanuele Borgonovo,et al.  Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Ioannis A. Papazoglou Mathematical Foundations of Event Trees , 1998 .

[8]  Alan N. Beard Risk assessment assumptions , 2004 .

[9]  Terje Aven,et al.  The risk concept - historical and recent development trends , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  J. Ciardi Fast and Slow , 1975 .

[11]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the allegations that small risks are treated out of proportion to their importance , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the Difference Between Risk as Seen From the Perspectives of the Analysts and Management , 2016 .

[13]  Terje Aven,et al.  A semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis, as an alternative to QRAs , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Marko Cepin Analysis of truncation limit in probabilistic safety assessment , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell Conditional Uncertainty Analysis and Implications for Decision Making: The Case of WIPP , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  Tunc Aldemir,et al.  A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants , 2013 .

[17]  George E Apostolakis,et al.  How Useful Is Quantitative Risk Assessment? , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .