Effect of different initial conditions on a turbulent round free jet

Abstract. Velocity measurements were made in two jet flows, the first exiting from a smooth contraction nozzle and the second from a long pipe with a fully developed pipe flow profile. The Reynolds number, based on nozzle diameter and exit bulk velocity, was the same (≃86,000) in each flow. The smooth contraction jet flow developed much more rapidly and approached self-preservation more rapidly than the pipe jet. These differences were associated with differences in the turbulence structure in both the near and far fields between the two jets. Throughout the shear layer for x<3d, the peak in the v spectrum occurred at a lower frequency in the pipe jet than in the contraction jet. For x≥3d, the peaks in the two jets appeared to be nearly at the same frequency. In the pipe jet, the near-field distributions of f(r) and g(r), the longitudinal and transverse velocity correlation functions, differed significantly from the contraction jet. The integral length scale Lu was greater in the pipe jet, whereas Lv was smaller. In the far field, the distributions of f(r) and g(r) were nearly similar in the two flows. The larger initial shear layer thickness of the pipe jet produced a dimensionally lower frequency instability, resulting in longer wavelength structures, which developed and paired at larger downstream distances. The regular vortex formation and pairing were disrupted in the shear layer of the pipe jet. The streamwise vortices, which enhance entrainment and turbulent mixing, were absent in the shear layer of the pipe jet. The formation of large-scale structures should occur much farther downstream in the pipe jet than in the contraction jet.

[1]  R. Moser,et al.  The three-dimensional evolution of a plane mixing layer: pairing and transition to turbulence , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  P. Strykowski,et al.  Turbulent structure and entrainment in heated jets: The effect of initial conditions , 1993 .

[3]  R. So,et al.  Some measurements in a binary gas jet , 1990 .

[4]  Robert D. Moser,et al.  Direct Simulation of a Self-Similar Turbulent Mixing Layer , 1994 .

[5]  William K. George,et al.  Velocity measurements in a high-Reynolds-number, momentum-conserving, axisymmetric, turbulent jet , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  L. Chua,et al.  Calibration ofX-probes for turbulent flow measurements , 1988 .

[7]  R. A. Antonia,et al.  Effect of initial conditions on a circular jet , 2001 .

[8]  E. Ferdman,et al.  Effect of Initial Velocity Profile on the Development of Round Jets , 2000 .

[9]  J. Mi,et al.  Influence of jet exit conditions on the passive scalar field of an axisymmetric free jet , 2001, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[10]  B. Boersma,et al.  Simulation of the mixing of a passive scalar in a round turbulent jet , 2001 .

[11]  C. Richards,et al.  Global density effects on the self-preservation behaviour of turbulent free jets , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  A. Townsend The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow , 1975 .

[13]  Sheila E. Widnall,et al.  The two- and three-dimensional instabilities of a spatially periodic shear layer , 1982, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Khairul Q. Zaman,et al.  Natural large-scale structures in the axisymmetric mixing layer , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Fazle Hussain,et al.  Organized motions in a fully developed turbulent axisymmetric jet , 1989 .

[16]  Geert Brethouwer,et al.  A numerical investigation on the effect of the inflow conditions on the self-similar region of a round jet , 1998 .

[17]  Israel J Wygnanski,et al.  Some measurements in the self-preserving jet , 1969, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[18]  Lambertus Hesselink,et al.  The evolution and nature of large‐scale structures in the turbulent jet , 1992 .

[19]  J. Lumley,et al.  Turbulence measurements in axisymmetric jets of air and helium. Part 1. Air jet , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  M. F. Zedan,et al.  Effects of the initial condition on the axisymmetric free shear layer: Effects of the initial momentum thickness , 1978 .