Ontology-based curriculum content sequencing system with semantic rules

Curriculum content sequencing involves managing a learning route to help users achieve learning goals. A conventional learning route consists of ordered content and is primarily based on a single course material. In an e-learning system, amount of similar course contents are available. These contents are expected to mutually substitute for one another in creating flexible learning routes. Owing to inconsistency in materials editing and cataloging, composing contents based on multiple sources leads to sequencing complexity. Most significantly, most e-learning systems lack a sequencing mechanism for dominating content composition. This study utilizes a knowledge-intensive approach to create a general sequencing knowledge base. This approach includes two components: (1) ontology is used to represent abstract views of content sequencing and course materials and (2) added semantic rules are used to represent relationships between individuals. Following knowledge base creation, both practical curriculum sequences and course materials can be inserted as factual knowledge. A reliable knowledge base can be established using inference power. An example involving mathematics course in elementary school education is designed using Web Ontology Language (OWL) and Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL). Experimental lessons demonstrate that semantic rules in conjunction with ontologies not only solve sequencing problems but also achieve a durable knowledge base and a reliable system.

[1]  Benjamin N. Grosof,et al.  Supporting Rule System Interoperability on the Semantic Web with SWRL , 2005, SEMWEB.

[2]  Hwa-Shan Huang,et al.  Constructing a personalized e-learning system based on genetic algorithm and case-based reasoning approach , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Elsabé Cloete,et al.  Electronic education system model , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[4]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[5]  Yu-Liang Chi Elicitation synergy of extracting conceptual tags and hierarchies in textual document , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[6]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  Carole D. Hafner,et al.  The State of the Art in Ontology Design: A Survey and Comparative Review , 1997, AI Mag..

[8]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language , 2003, J. Web Semant..

[9]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Can e-learning replace classroom learning? , 2004, CACM.

[10]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Personalized curriculum sequencing utilizing modified item response theory for web-based instruction , 2006, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  Balakrishnan Chandrasekaran,et al.  What are ontologies, and why do we need them? , 1999, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[12]  Tim Wahls,et al.  The course scheduling problem as a source of student projects , 2005 .

[13]  Yu-Liang Chi A consumer-centric design approach to develop comprehensive knowledge-based systems for keyword discovery , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[14]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Course sequencing techniques for large-scale web-based education , 2003 .

[15]  Marc Kaltenbach,et al.  A curriculum based visual interface for course authoring and learning , 2001, SCOU.

[16]  S. Alexander E‐learning developments and experiences , 2001 .

[17]  Ian Horrocks,et al.  OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation , 2005, J. Web Semant..

[18]  Lee Gillam,et al.  Terminology and the construction of ontology , 2005 .

[19]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Web-based teaching and learner control: a research review , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Michael Uschold,et al.  Ontologies: principles, methods and applications , 1996, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[21]  Harold Boley,et al.  Interpreting SWRL Rules in RDF Graphs , 2006, WLFM@FM.

[22]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Understanding and building, using ontologies , 1997, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Christine Golbreich,et al.  Combining Rule and Ontology Reasoners for the Semantic Web , 2004, RuleML.

[24]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability , 2004, Journal of Web Semantics.

[25]  G Stix,et al.  The mice that warred. , 2001, Scientific American.

[26]  John R. Josephson,et al.  What Are They? Why Do We Need Them? , 1999 .

[27]  Olivera Marjanovic Using process-oriented, sequencing educational technologies: Some important pedagogical issues , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..