Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities

The internet is the most comprehensive electronic archive of written material representing our world and peoples' opinions, concerns, and desires. Physicians who surf the internet for the first time are often stunned by what they learn on websites set up by lay people or patient self support communities. Material on these venues can be a rich source for researchers interested in understanding the experiences and views of people and patients. Qualitative analysis of material published and communicated on the internet can serve to systematise and codify needs, values, concerns, and preferences of consumers and professionals relevant to health and health care. While the internet makes people's interactions uniquely accessible for researchers and erases boundaries of time and distance, such research raises new issues in research ethics, particularly concerning informed consent and privacy of research subjects, as the borders between public and private spaces are sometimes blurred. #### Summary points Internet communities (such as mailing lists, chat rooms, newsgroups, or discussion boards on websites) are rich sources of qualitative data for health researchers Qualitative analysis of internet postings may help to systematise and codify needs, values, and preferences of consumers and professionals relevant to health and health care Internet based research raises several ethical questions, especially pertaining to privacy and informed consent Researchers and institutional review boards must primarily consider whether research is intrusive and has potential for harm, whether the venue is perceived as “private” or “public” space, how confidentiality can be protected, and whether and how informed consent should be obtained Internet communities provide a way for a group of peers to communicate with each other. They include discussion boards on websites, mailing lists, chat rooms, or newsgroups. Examples of health related mailing lists can easily be found by inserting a key word such as “cancer” in the search box at the …

[1]  A. Winzelberg The analysis of an electronic support group for individuals with eating disorders , 1997 .

[2]  J A Seaboldt,et al.  Comparison of information obtained from a Usenet newsgroup and from drug information centers. , 1997, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[3]  Research based on archived information and samples. Recommendations from the Royal College of Physicians Committee on Ethical Issues in Medicine. , 1999, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[4]  Robert Alun Jones,et al.  The Ethics of Research in Cyberspace , 1994 .

[5]  B. F. Sharf Beyond Netiquette: The Ethics of Doing Naturalistic Discourse Research on the Internet , 1999 .

[6]  P. Klemm,et al.  A nontraditional cancer support group. The Internet. , 1998, Computers in nursing.

[7]  R. Barbour,et al.  The role of qualitative research in broadening the 'evidence base' for clinical practice. , 2000, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[8]  J. Finn,et al.  An exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. , 1999, Health & social work.

[9]  David Hardisty,et al.  On the Internet , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[10]  Gunther Eysenbach,et al.  Consumer health informatics , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  White Mh,et al.  Online support for caregivers. Analysis of an Internet Alzheimer mailgroup. , 2000 .

[12]  B. F. Sharf Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the Internet. , 1997, Women & health.

[13]  Storm A. King,et al.  Researching Internet Communities: Proposed Ethical Guidelines for the Reporting of Results , 1996, Inf. Soc..

[14]  M. Feldman Munchausen by Internet: Detecting Factitious Illness and Crisis on the Internet , 2000, Southern medical journal.

[15]  L. DeFiore Internet and medicine , 1995 .