Environmental DNA (eDNA) From the Wake of the Whales: Droplet Digital PCR for Detection and Species Identification

Genetic sampling for identification of species, subspecies or stock of whales, dolphins and porpoises at sea remains challenging. Most samples have been collected with some form of a biopsy dart requiring a close approach of a vessel while the individual is at the surface. Here we have adopted droplet digital (dd)PCR technology for detection and species identification of cetaceans using environmental (e)DNA collected from seawater. We conducted a series of eDNA sampling experiments during 25 encounters with killer whales, Orcinus orca, in Puget Sound (the Salish Sea). The regular habits of killer whales in these inshore waters allowed us to locate pods and collect seawater, at an initial distance of 200 m and at 15-minute intervals, for up to two hours after the passage of the whales. To optimize detection, we designed a set of oligonucleotide primers and probes to target short fragments of the mitochondrial (mt)DNA control region, with a focus on identification of known killer whale ecotypes. We confirmed the potential to detect eDNA in the wake of the whales for up to two hours, despite movement of the water mass by several kilometers due to tidal currents. Re-amplification and sequencing of the eDNA barcode confirmed that the ddPCR detection included the ‘southern resident community’ of killer whales, consistent with the calls from hydrophone recordings and visual observations.

[1]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples , 2008, Biology Letters.

[2]  H. Doi,et al.  Use of Droplet Digital PCR for Estimation of Fish Abundance and Biomass in Environmental DNA Surveys , 2015, PloS one.

[3]  D. Hauser,et al.  Summer distribution patterns of southern resident killer whales Orcinus orca: core areas and spatial segregation of social groups , 2007 .

[4]  Jianfu Zhao,et al.  Using environmental DNA to assess population‐wide spatiotemporal reserve use , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[5]  Lauren M. Sassoubre,et al.  Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding , 2017, PloS one.

[6]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Russel D. Andrews,et al.  First Long-Term Behavioral Records from Cuvier’s Beaked Whales (Ziphius cavirostris) Reveal Record-Breaking Dives , 2014, PloS one.

[8]  R. Payne,et al.  RESTRICTABLE DNA FROM SLOUGHED CETACEAN SKIN; ITS POTENTIAL FOR USE IN POPULATION ANALYSIS , 1992 .

[9]  H A Ross,et al.  DNA surveillance: web-based molecular identification of whales, dolphins, and porpoises. , 2003, The Journal of heredity.

[10]  V. Cockcroft,et al.  A comprehensive and validated molecular taxonomy of beaked whales, family Ziphiidae. , 2004, The Journal of heredity.

[11]  M. Thomas P. Gilbert,et al.  Investigating the Potential Use of Environmental DNA (eDNA) for Genetic Monitoring of Marine Mammals , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  S. Weisberg,et al.  The Next-Generation PCR-Based Quantification Method for Ambient Waters: Digital PCR. , 2016, Methods in molecular biology.

[13]  D. Noren,et al.  Review of cetacean biopsy techniques: Factors contributing to successful sample collection and physiological and behavioral impacts , 2012 .

[14]  Jesse A. Port,et al.  Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[15]  Jeffrey E. Hill,et al.  Assessing Environmental DNA Detection in Controlled Lentic Systems , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  L. Orlando,et al.  Population characteristics of a large whale shark aggregation inferred from seawater environmental DNA , 2016, Nature Ecology &Evolution.

[17]  R. Dorazio,et al.  Detection limits of quantitative and digital PCR assays and their influence in presence–absence surveys of environmental DNA , 2017, Molecular ecology resources.

[18]  B. Letcher,et al.  Distance, flow and PCR inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[19]  P. Wade,et al.  Geographic patterns of genetic differentiation among killer whales in the northern North Pacific. , 2013, The Journal of heredity.

[20]  R. W. Baird,et al.  Diving behaviour of Cuvier's (Ziphius cavirostris) and Blainville's (Mesoplodon densirostris) beaked whales in Hawai'i , 2006 .

[21]  T. Morato,et al.  Development of a sensitive detection method to survey pelagic biodiversity using eDNA and quantitative PCR: a case study of devil ray at seamounts , 2017 .

[22]  Jianfu Zhao,et al.  Characterization, optimization, and validation of environmental DNA (eDNA) markers to detect an endangered aquatic mammal , 2016, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[23]  L. Noble,et al.  Amplifying dolphin mitochondrial DNA from faecal plumes , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[24]  J. Ford,et al.  Vocal traditions among resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in coastal waters of British Columbia , 1991 .

[25]  A. Piaggio,et al.  Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[26]  R. Lambertsen.  A Biopsy System for Large Whales and Its Use for Cytogenetics , 1987 .

[27]  J. McCarthy,et al.  The Whale Pump: Marine Mammals Enhance Primary Productivity in a Coastal Basin , 2010, PloS one.

[28]  V. Lukoschek,et al.  Incomplete reporting of whale, dolphin and porpoise ‘bycatch’ revealed by molecular monitoring of Korean markets , 2006 .

[29]  M. Witte,et al.  A Systematic Investigation of Parameters Influencing Droplet Rain in the Listeria monocytogenes prfA Assay - Reduction of Ambiguous Results in ddPCR , 2016, PloS one.

[30]  D. Lodge,et al.  The room temperature preservation of filtered environmental DNA samples and assimilation into a phenol–chloroform–isoamyl alcohol DNA extraction , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[31]  S. Palumbi,et al.  Which whales are hunted? A molecular genetic approach to monitoring whaling. , 1994, Science.

[32]  A. Frantzis,et al.  Worldwide structure of mtDNA diversity among Cuvier's beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris): implications for threatened populations , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[33]  A. Hall,et al.  Overcoming the challenges of studying conservation physiology in large whales: a review of available methods , 2013, Conservation physiology.

[34]  R. Anderson,et al.  Resurrection of Mesoplodon hotaula Deraniyagala 1963: A new species of beaked whale in the tropical Indo‐Pacific , 2014 .

[35]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Long duration, room temperature preservation of filtered eDNA samples , 2015, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[36]  Genetic differentiation and limited gene flow among fragmented populations of New Zealand endemic Hector’s and Maui’s dolphins , 2012, Conservation Genetics.

[37]  M. Heithaus,et al.  A BIOPSY SYSTEM FOR SMALL CETACEANS: DARTING SUCCESS AND WOUND HEALING IN TURSIOPS SPP. , 2002 .

[38]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  “Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA , 2011 .

[39]  Hanlee P. Ji,et al.  Correction to High Sensitivity Detection and Quantitation of DNA Copy Number and Single Nucleotide Variants with Single Color Droplet Digital PCR , 2015, Analytical chemistry.

[40]  S. Mariani,et al.  Environmental DNA reveals tropical shark diversity in contrasting levels of anthropogenic impact , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[41]  A. Piaggio,et al.  Clearing muddied waters: Capture of environmental DNA from turbid waters , 2017, PloS one.