The Economics of Low Stabilization: Model Comparison of Mitigation Strategies and Costs

This study gives a synthesis of a model comparison assessing the technological feasibility and economic consequences of achieving greenhouse gas concentration targets that are sufficiently low to keep the increase in global mean temperature below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. All five global energy-environment-economy models show that achieving low greenhouse gas concentration targets is technically feasible and economically viable. The ranking of the importance of individual technology options is robust across models. For the lowest stabilization target (400 ppm CO2 eq), the use of bio-energy in combination with CCS plays a crucial role, and biomass potential dominates the cost of reaching this target. Without CCS or the considerable extension of renewables the 400 ppm CO2 eq target is not achievable. Across the models, estimated aggregate costs up to 2100 are below 0.8% global GDP for 550 ppm CO2 eq stabilization and below 2.5% for the 400 ppm CO2 eq pathway. Copyright © 2010 by the IAEE.

[1]  Henry Neufeldt,et al.  Making Climate Change Work for Us , 2009 .

[2]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Scenarios as the basis for assessment of mitigation and adaptation , 2010 .

[3]  Y. Kaya.  Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth : Interpretation of proposed scenarios , 1989 .

[4]  W. Nordhaus.  The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[5]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[6]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Technological Change and International Trade -Insights from REMIND-R , 2010 .

[7]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Bio-Energy Use and Low Stabilization Scenarios , 2010 .

[8]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[9]  Detlef P. van Vuuren,et al.  Near-linear cost increase to reduce climate-change risk , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Jan Corfee-Morlot,et al.  Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern” , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  L. Clarke,et al.  International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios , 2009 .

[12]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[13]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Long-Term Multi-Gas Scenarios to Stabilise Radiative Forcing - Exploring Costs and Benefits Within an Integrated Assessment Framework , 2006 .

[14]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs , 2007 .

[15]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations , 2007 .

[16]  P. Sands.  The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1992 .

[17]  Gunnar Luderer,et al.  Managing the Low-Carbon Transition - From Model Results to Policies , 2010 .

[18]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[19]  John P. Weyant,et al.  Overview of EMF-21: Multigas Mitigation and Climate Policy , 2006 .

[20]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[21]  Bill Hare,et al.  How Much Warming are We Committed to and How Much can be Avoided? , 2006 .

[22]  Valentina Bosetti,et al.  The Economics of Decarbonization – Results from the RECIPE model intercomparison , 2009 .

[23]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  IMAGE and MESSAGE Scenarios Limiting GHG Concentration to Low Levels , 2008 .

[24]  T. Kram,et al.  Integrated Modeling of Global Environmental Change (IMAGE) , 2011 .

[25]  D. V. van Vuuren,et al.  Peaking profiles for achieving long-term temperature targets with more likelihood at lower costs , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  D. Streets,et al.  Dangerous human-made interference with climate: a GISS modelE study , 2006, physics/0610115.

[27]  David Popp,et al.  Where Does Energy R&D Come from? Examining Crowding Out from Environmentally-Friendly R&D , 2009 .

[28]  Wolfgang Lucht,et al.  Tipping elements in the Earth's climate system , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  Technology Options for Low Stabilization Pathways with MERGE , 2010 .

[30]  Michael Grubb,et al.  Induced Technological Change: Exploring its Implications for the Economics of Atmospheric Stabilization: Synthesis Report from the innovation Modeling Comparison Project , 2006 .

[31]  Richard G. Richels,et al.  The Attached Material Is Posted on Regulation2point0.org with Permission. the Impact of Learning-by-doing on the Timing and Costs of Co 2 Abatement the Impact of Learning-by-doing on the Timing and Costs of Co 2 Abatement , 2022 .

[32]  D. Vuuren,et al.  Regional abatement action and costs under allocation schemes for emission allowances for achieving low CO2-equivalent concentrations , 2008 .

[33]  L. Greene.  EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[34]  M. Weitzman,et al.  Stern Review : The Economics of Climate Change , 2006 .

[35]  D. P. Vuuren,et al.  Environmental effectiveness and economic consequences of fragmented versus universal regimes: what can we learn from model studies? , 2009 .

[36]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Mitigation Costs in a Globalized World: Climate Policy Analysis with REMIND-R , 2010 .

[37]  Terry Barker,et al.  The economics of avoiding dangerous climate change. An editorial essay on The Stern Review , 2008 .

[38]  R. Tol,et al.  The Energy Journal , 2006 .

[39]  Socrates Kypreos.  Modeling experience curves in MERGE (model for evaluating regional and global effects) , 2005 .

[40]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Combining Energy Technology Dynamics and Macroeconometrics: The E3MG Model , 2006 .

[41]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  The Perils of the Learning Model for Modeling Endogenous Technological Change , 2009 .

[42]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Achieving the G8 50% target: modelling induced and accelerated technological change using the macro-econometric model E3MG , 2008 .

[43]  Kristen Averyt,et al.  IPCC, 2007: Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[44]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Issues related to mitigation in the long-term context , 2007 .

[45]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 1995: the science of climate change. , 1996 .

[46]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  Merge: An Integrated Assessment Model for Global Climate Change , 2005 .

[47]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  The Feasibility of Low Concentration Targets: An Application of FUND , 2009 .

[48]  Socrates Kypreos,et al.  A MERGE Model with Endogenous Technological Progress , 2003 .

[49]  T. Kram,et al.  Comparison of top-down and bottom-up estimates of sectoral and regional greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials , 2009 .

[50]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere , 2006 .

[51]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .