Measurement of heating coil temperature for e-cigarettes with a “top-coil” clearomizer

Objectives To determine the effect of applied power settings, coil wetness conditions, and e-liquid compositions on the coil heating temperature for e-cigarettes with a “top-coil” clearomizer, and to make associations of coil conditions with emission of toxic carbonyl compounds by combining results herein with the literature. Methods The coil temperature of a second generation e-cigarette was measured at various applied power levels, coil conditions, and e-liquid compositions, including (1) measurements by thermocouple at three e-liquid fill levels (dry, wet-through-wick, and full-wet), three coil resistances (low, standard, and high), and four voltage settings (3–6 V) for multiple coils using propylene glycol (PG) as a test liquid; (2) measurements by thermocouple at additional degrees of coil wetness for a high resistance coil using PG; and (3) measurements by both thermocouple and infrared (IR) camera for high resistance coils using PG alone and a 1:1 (wt/wt) mixture of PG and glycerol (PG/GL). Results For single point thermocouple measurements with PG, coil temperatures ranged from 322 ‒ 1008°C, 145 ‒ 334°C, and 110 ‒ 185°C under dry, wet-through-wick, and full-wet conditions, respectively, for the total of 13 replaceable coil heads. For conditions measured with both a thermocouple and an IR camera, all thermocouple measurements were between the minimum and maximum across-coil IR camera measurements and equal to 74% ‒ 115% of the across-coil mean, depending on test conditions. The IR camera showed details of the non-uniform temperature distribution across heating coils. The large temperature variations under wet-through-wick conditions may explain the large variations in formaldehyde formation rate reported in the literature for such “top-coil” clearomizers. Conclusions This study established a simple and straight-forward protocol to systematically measure e-cigarette coil heating temperature under dry, wet-through-wick, and full-wet conditions. In addition to applied power, the composition of e-liquid, and the devices’ ability to efficiently deliver e-liquid to the heating coil are important product design factors effecting coil operating temperature. Precautionary temperature checks on e-cigarettes under manufacturer-recommended normal use conditions may help to reduce the health risks from exposure to toxic carbonyl emissions associated with coil overheating.

[1]  R. Strongin,et al.  Benzene formation in electronic cigarettes , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  John H. Miller,et al.  Method for the Determination of Carbonyl Compounds in E-Cigarette Aerosols , 2017, Journal of chromatographic science.

[3]  M. Mendell,et al.  A Device-Independent Evaluation of Carbonyl Emissions from Heated Electronic Cigarette Solvents , 2017, PloS one.

[4]  N. Saliba,et al.  Transport phenomena governing nicotine emissions from electronic cigarettes: Model formulation and experimental investigation , 2017, Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research.

[5]  H. Destaillats,et al.  Emissions from Electronic Cigarettes: Key Parameters Affecting the Release of Harmful Chemicals. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Amanda Y. Kong,et al.  What is included with your online e-cigarette order? An analysis of e-cigarette shipping, product and packaging features , 2016, Tobacco Control.

[7]  D. Bernhard,et al.  Vapours of US and EU Market Leader Electronic Cigarette Brands and Liquids Are Cytotoxic for Human Vascular Endothelial Cells , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Effects of design parameters and puff topography on heating coil temperature and mainstream aerosols in electronic cigarettes , 2016 .

[9]  O. Geiss,et al.  Correlation of volatile carbonyl yields emitted by e-cigarettes with the temperature of the heating coil and the perceived sensorial quality of the generated vapours. , 2016, International journal of hygiene and environmental health.

[10]  A. Shihadeh,et al.  "Direct Dripping": A High-Temperature, High-Formaldehyde Emission Electronic Cigarette Use Method. , 2016, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[11]  K. Kistler,et al.  Effect of variable power levels on the yield of total aerosol mass and formation of aldehydes in e-cigarette aerosols. , 2016, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[12]  K. Farsalinos,et al.  E-cigarettes generate high levels of aldehydes only in 'dry puff' conditions. , 2015, Addiction.

[13]  R. Strongin,et al.  Hidden formaldehyde in e-cigarette aerosols. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Kanae Bekki,et al.  Carbonyl Compounds Generated from Electronic Cigarettes , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[15]  Andrzej Sobczak,et al.  Carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette vapors: effects of nicotine solvent and battery output voltage. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[16]  Anthony Gamst,et al.  Four hundred and sixty brands of e-cigarettes and counting: implications for product regulation , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[17]  Christopher J Brown,et al.  Electronic cigarettes: product characterisation and design considerations , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[18]  K. Farsalinos,et al.  Evaluation of Electronic Cigarette Use (Vaping) Topography and Estimation of Liquid Consumption: Implications for Research Protocol Standards Definition and for Public Health Authorities’ Regulation , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[19]  T. Salthammer,et al.  Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping? , 2013, Indoor air.