Improving operational performance by influencing shopfloor behavior via performance management practices

Abstract It is generally believed that companies applying performance management practices outperform those that do not measure and manage their performance. Studies examining the link between performance management and performance improvement implicitly assume that performance management affects behavior of individuals in an organization, which then facilitates the achievement of organizational goals. This study takes a step towards understanding this implicit assumption. We investigate how performance management practices relate to improvement in performance by influencing behavior of individuals. We focus on operational performance management, i.e. the definition and use of performance measures on the shopfloor in production and distribution. We use a survey among 102 companies to identify the relations between performance management practices, shopfloor behavior and improvement in performance. We identified three independent clusters of operator behavior that positively correlate with performance improvement: “Understanding”, “Motivation” and “Focus on Improvement”. We show that 17 out of the 20 performance management practices found in literature have a significant and positive relation with one or more clusters of operator behavior. We furthermore found that there is a positive correlation between the number of performance management practices applied and performance improvement, suggesting that it is not only which practices are applied but also how many. Recommendations emerging from this study enable managers to identify which behavioral changes are desired to improve performance and to select those performance management practices that positively influence the desired behavior.

[1]  R. Hensley A review of operations management studies using scale development techniques , 1999 .

[2]  Andy Neely,et al.  Implementing performance measurement systems: a literature review , 2003 .

[3]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Assessing some distinctive dimensions of performance feedback information in high performing plants , 2000 .

[4]  Heinz Ahn,et al.  Applying the balanced scorecard concept : an experience report , 2001 .

[5]  Lawrence M. Corbett,et al.  Searching for the sandcone in the GMRG data , 2001 .

[6]  William N. Goetzmann,et al.  Portfolio Performance Manipulation and Manipulation-Proof Performance Measures , 2004 .

[7]  Charles H. Fine Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control In The Age Of Temporary Advantage , 1998 .

[8]  Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  Development and validation of a measurement instrument for studying supply chain management practices , 2005 .

[9]  Mike Bourne,et al.  An examination of the literature relating to issues affecting how companies manage through measures , 2005 .

[10]  André de Waal,et al.  Stimulating performance‐driven behaviour to obtain better results , 2004 .

[11]  Mike Kennerley,et al.  Managing through measures: a study of impact on performance , 2005 .

[12]  S. Holmberg,et al.  Systems Thinking in Supply Chain Measurements , 2000 .

[13]  Benita M. Beamon,et al.  Measuring supply chain performance , 1999 .

[14]  J. Wacker A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management , 1998 .

[15]  Richard Thorpe,et al.  Performance management : multidisciplinary perspectives , 2008 .

[16]  André de Waal,et al.  Lessons learned from performance management systems implementations , 2009 .

[17]  A. Neely The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? , 1999 .

[18]  M. E. Kuwaiti Performance measurement process: definition and ownership , 2004 .

[19]  Hing Kai Chan,et al.  A review of performance measurement systems for supply chain management , 2006 .

[20]  Taylor Randall,et al.  Performance Implications of Strategic Performance Measurement in Financial Services Firms , 2003 .

[21]  David Otley,et al.  Performance Management: A Framework for Management Control Systems Research , 1999 .

[22]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Effects of Intra-individual Goal Conflict on Performance , 1994 .

[23]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Metrics and performance measurement in operations management: dealing with the metrics maze , 2004 .

[24]  Mike Bourne,et al.  Researching performance measurement system implementation: the dynamics of success and failure , 2005 .

[25]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Performance Metric Portfolios: A Framework and Empirical Analysis , 2007 .

[26]  Fredrik Nilsson,et al.  Performance measurement at Nordic companies , 2000 .

[27]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Enhanced performance measurement using OR: a case study , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  Andy Neely,et al.  A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems , 2002 .

[29]  Andy Neely,et al.  The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: Perceptions of participating managers , 2002 .

[30]  André de Waal,et al.  The Role of Behavioral Factors and National Cultures in Creating Effective Performance Management Systems , 2006 .

[31]  Jody Hoffer Gittell,et al.  Business Performance Measurement: Anomalies of measurement: when it works, but should not , 2007 .

[32]  John M. Kay,et al.  The role of performance measurement in business process re‐engineering , 2000 .

[33]  H. Günter,et al.  Measuring Supply Chain Performance: Current Research and Future Directions , 2006 .

[34]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  A framework for supply chain performance measurement , 2004 .

[35]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year odyssey. , 2002, The American psychologist.

[36]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures: Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard , 2003 .

[37]  Johannes M. Pennings,et al.  Executive Reward Systems: A Cross‐National Comparison , 1993 .

[38]  R. Chenhall Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future , 2003 .

[39]  P. Cousins,et al.  Performance measurement in strategic buyer‐supplier relationships: The mediating role of socialization mechanisms , 2008 .

[40]  Mirjam van Praag,et al.  The Effects of Performance Measurement and Compensation on Motivation: An Empirical Study , 2003 .

[41]  Matthew D. Hall,et al.  The effect of comprehensive performance measurement systems on role clarity, psychological empowerment and managerial performance , 2008 .

[42]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[43]  Andy Neely,et al.  Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems , 2000 .

[44]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence , 2008 .

[45]  Anil Arya,et al.  Performance measurement manipulation: cherry-picking what to correct , 2008 .

[46]  Juhani Ukko,et al.  Performance measurement impacts on management and leadership: Perspectives of management and employees , 2007 .

[47]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  The Relationship between the Level of Completeness of a Strategic Performance Management System and Perceived Advantages and Disadvantages , 2009 .

[48]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment , 2001 .

[49]  Joy M. Field,et al.  Work team performance over time: three case studies of South African manufacturers , 2002 .

[50]  G. Huber,et al.  Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy , 1985 .

[51]  Andy Neely,et al.  Business performance measurement: Unifying theories and integrating practice, second edition , 2007 .

[52]  Anthony D. Ross,et al.  An integrated benchmarking approach to distribution center performance using DEA modeling , 2002 .

[53]  A. Neely The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next , 2005 .

[54]  James R. Evans An exploratory study of performance measurement systems and relationships with performance results , 2004 .

[55]  Joel S. Demski,et al.  Performance Measure Manipulation , 1998 .

[56]  E. Nijssen,et al.  Performance effects of using the Balanced Scorecard: a note on the Dutch experience , 2004 .

[57]  Marc Wouters,et al.  Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department , 2008 .

[58]  Steve Mason,et al.  Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system , 2007 .

[59]  M. Frohlich Techniques for improving response rates in OM survey research , 2002 .

[60]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  The design and effects of control systems: tests of direct- and indirect-effects models , 2000 .

[61]  Ellen J. Dumond Making Best Use of Performance Measures and Information , 1994 .

[62]  J. Fransoo,et al.  Drivers of close supply chain collaboration: one size fits all? , 2009 .

[63]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance , 2003 .

[64]  Robert Johnston,et al.  ‘Good enough’ performance measurement: a trade-off between activity and action , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[65]  Peter F. Luckett,et al.  Feedback and management accounting: A review of research into behavioural consequences , 1991 .

[66]  Umit S. Bititci,et al.  Implementation and impact of IT-supported performance measurement systems , 2005 .

[67]  Olaf A.M. Fisscher,et al.  Ethical Dilemmas in Performance Measurement , 2003 .

[68]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Performance measures and metrics in logistics and supply chain management: a review of recent literature (1995–2004) for research and applications , 2007 .