Fitting the child's mind to the world: adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity in 8-year-olds.

In adults, facial identity is coded by opponent processes relative to an average face or norm, as evidenced by the face identity aftereffect: adapting to a face biases perception towards the opposite identity, so that a previously neutral face (e.g. the average) resembles the identity of the computationally opposite face. We investigated whether children as young as 8 use adaptive norm-based coding to represent faces, a question of interest because 8-year-olds are less accurate than adults at recognizing faces and do not show the adult neural markers of face expertise. We found comparable face identity aftereffects in 8-year-olds and adults: perception of identity in both groups shifted in the direction predicted by norm-based coding. This finding suggests that, by 8 years of age, the adaptive computational mechanisms used to code facial identity are like those of adults and hence that children's immaturities in face processing arise from another source.

[1]  D. Mayer,et al.  Visual acuity development in infants and young children, as assessed by operant preferential looking , 1982, Vision Research.

[2]  S. Carey,et al.  Are faces perceived as configurations more by adults than by children , 1994 .

[3]  Linda Jeffery,et al.  View-specific coding of face shape. , 2010, Psychological science.

[4]  C. Pallier,et al.  Reversibility of the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition During Childhood , 2005, Psychological science.

[5]  R. K. Simpson.  Nature Neuroscience , 2022 .

[6]  D. Maurer,et al.  Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features. , 2004, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  D. Maurer,et al.  The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing , 2007 .

[8]  P. Hancock,et al.  Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  L. Wood,et al.  From the Authors , 2003, European Respiratory Journal.

[10]  H. Wilson,et al.  fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. , 2005, Proceedings. Biological sciences.

[13]  A. O'Toole,et al.  The role of familiarity in three-dimensional view-transferability of face identity adaptation , 2007, Vision Research.

[14]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants , 2001 .

[15]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face , 2007, Vision Research.

[17]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. , 2005, Developmental science.

[19]  T. Valentine.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[20]  Otto H. MacLin,et al.  Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  H. Wilson,et al.  The nature of synthetic face adaptation , 2005, Vision Research.

[22]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  C. Chubb,et al.  The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect , 2001, Vision Research.

[25]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Holistic Processing of Faces in Preschool Children and Adults , 2003, Psychological science.

[27]  D. Maurer,et al.  Developmental changes in face processing skills. , 2003, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[28]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity , 2006, Vision Research.

[29]  C. Clifford,et al.  Pulling Faces: An Investigation of the Face-Distortion Aftereffect , 2003, Perception.

[30]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[31]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Visual category-selectivity for faces, places and objects emerges along different developmental trajectories. , 2007, Developmental science.

[32]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  R. Buxton,et al.  The development of face and location processing: an fMRI study , 2003 .

[34]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Face recognition in young children : When the whole is greater than the sum of its parts , 1998 .

[35]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Probing the Visual Representation of Faces With Adaptation , 2006, Psychological science.

[36]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Fitting the mind to the World , 2003, Psychological science.

[37]  R. Dougherty,et al.  The maturation of form and motion perception in school age children , 2005, Vision Research.

[38]  J E Joseph,et al.  Developmental shifts in cortical loci for face and object recognition , 2004, Neuroreport.

[39]  D. Maurer,et al.  Development of spatial and temporal vision during childhood , 1999, Vision Research.

[40]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Development of face recognition in infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 2005 .

[41]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  Adaptation and Face Perception - How Aftereffects Implicate Norm-Based Coding of Faces , 2005 .

[42]  Development affects the ventral and dorsal processing streams differently: an fMRI study on face and location processing in children, teenagers and adults , 2001, NeuroImage.

[43]  M. Giese,et al.  Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2006, Nature.

[44]  B. Rossion,et al.  Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: evidence from the composite face effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[45]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Face Recognition Memory and Configural Processing: A Developmental ERP Study using Upright, Inverted, and Contrast-Reversed Faces , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  E. McKone,et al.  Early maturity of face processing in children: Local and relational distinctiveness effects in 7-year-olds , 2003 .

[47]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces? , 2006, Developmental science.

[48]  Andrew N. Meltzoff,et al.  Brain Activation during Face Perception: Evidence of a Developmental Change , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  G. Rhodes,et al.  The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects , 2007, Vision Research.