Participation in decision making: a case study of job satisfaction and commitment (part one)

Purpose – When employees believe in and trust their management it motivates and encourages employees’ participation in decision making which improves employees’ efforts, benefits their job satisfaction and commitment to work. All of these factors, in turn, contribute to a trustworthy manager-employee relationship. While the literature supports this premise, there is little empirical evidence that patterns of causal inference in the relationship are clearly understood. This three part empirical case aims to focus on studying the relations between employee trust in management in a Quebec manufacturing company and their job satisfaction, intention to quit, level of employee participation in decision making and their commitment. Design/methodology/approach – This empirical case will test five hypothesis regarding seven variables influencing the level of employee engagement and commitment, employee turnover, employee participation in decision making processes and job satisfaction. Findings – The article finds that employee trust in management is an important determinant of their willingness to participate in decision making. Insufficient employee participation in decision making in turn leads to low level of employee job satisfaction and employee commitment. Lack of employee commitment and engagement affects the employee’s intention to quit. Research limitations/implications – The sample size of the office workers was not sufficient in order to have statistically significant results of the correlations between the variables for the production department employees, and for the office/administrative staff. This could have helped to determine the level of internal communication specifically, but also the level of all of the other variables for the two different groups of employees. Practical implications – This article offers useful insights for management in relation to strengthening interpersonal trust within an organization and introducing employee empowerment practices. Social implications – Owing to lack of trust in management, there will be high employee turnover. This in its turn will have a negative effect on both the performance of management and employees’ welfare, job satisfaction and commitment. Originality/value – The findings provide empirical evidence to support theoretical models that link employee trust in management, participation in decision making, job satisfaction, commitment, turnover intentions and highlight the impact of these factors on organizational performance.

[1]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[2]  Ydd b.,et al.  Theories of Communication , 2015 .

[3]  Kevin Daniels,et al.  Strategy development processes and participation in decision making: predictors of role stressors and job satisfaction , 1999 .

[4]  Michael D. Hazen,et al.  A Factor Analytic Study of Communication Satisfaction , 1977 .

[5]  K. Blanchard,et al.  Empowerment Takes More Than a Minute , 1996 .

[6]  Alison M. Konrad,et al.  Engaging employees through high involvement work practices , 2009 .

[7]  P. Mattessich Collaboration: What Makes It Work , 2001 .

[8]  C. Lau,et al.  The effects of budget emphasis, participation and organizational commitment on job satisfaction: Evidence from the financial services sector , 2002 .

[9]  Megan Tschannen-Moran,et al.  Collaboration and the need fortrust , 2001 .

[10]  S. Albrecht,et al.  The influence of empowering leadership, empowerment and engagement on affective commitment and turnover intentions in community health service workers: Test of a model , 2011 .

[11]  S. Gaertner Structural determinants of job satisfaction and organizational commitment in turnover models. , 1999 .

[12]  F. Diebold,et al.  Regime Switching with Time-Varying Transition Probabilities , 2020, Business Cycles.

[13]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Human Communication Theory and Research , 1992 .

[14]  A. Saks Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement , 2006 .

[15]  Dave Clements,et al.  Effective teamwork in healthcare: research and reality. , 2007, HealthcarePapers.

[16]  C. Argyris Intervention theory and method : a behavioral science view. , 1970 .

[17]  P. Bayerl,et al.  WHEN TWELVE HEADS ARE BETTER THAN ONE: IMPLEMENTING A SHARED LEADERSHIP CONCEPT IN A POLICE AGENCY. , 2006 .

[18]  L. A. Witt,et al.  The Role of Participation in Decision-Making in the Organizational Politics-Job Satisfaction Relationship , 2000 .

[19]  R. Putnam The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[20]  Brenda Scott-Ladd,et al.  Causal inferences between participation in decision making, task attributes, work effort, rewards, job satisfaction and commitment , 2006 .

[21]  Anne Powell,et al.  Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  E. Günlü,et al.  Job satisfaction and organizational commitment of hotel managers in Turkey , 2010 .

[23]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[24]  Dale E. Zand Trust and Managerial Problem Solving , 1972 .

[25]  Tahira M Probst,et al.  Countering the negative effects of job insecurity through participative decision making: lessons from the demand-control model. , 2005, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[26]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Communicating and organizing , 1976 .

[27]  G. Latham,et al.  Goal Setting and Goal Orientation: An Integration of Two Different Yet Related Literatures , 2004 .

[28]  C. Wildermuth,et al.  A perfect match: decoding employee engagement – Part I: Engaging cultures and leaders , 2008 .

[29]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[30]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[31]  Lawrence S. Wrightsman,et al.  Assumptions about human nature: A social-psychological approach , 1974 .

[32]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Relationships between job satisfaction and organizational commitment among restaurant employees , 2000 .

[33]  S. H. Appelbaum,et al.  RX for excessive turnover: lessons in communicating a vision (part 1) , 2009 .

[34]  Iris Reychav,et al.  Trust: an antecedent to employee extra‐role behaviour , 2010 .

[35]  A. Bakker,et al.  Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi‐sample study , 2004 .

[36]  Timothy L. Ross,et al.  Attributions for Participation and Nonparticipation in Gainsharing- Plan Involvement Systems , 1991 .

[37]  Lynn Kalani Terumi Hayase Internal communication in organizations and employee engagement , 2009 .

[38]  James K. Harter,et al.  Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  James C. Ryan,et al.  Communication, Commitment & Trust: Exploring the Triad , 2011 .

[40]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[41]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[42]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Participation's Effects On Performance and Satisfaction: A Reconsideration Of Research Evidence , 1994 .

[43]  L. Witt,et al.  Perceived Environmental Uncertainty and Participation in Decisionmaking in the Prediction of Perceptions of the Fairness of Personnel Decisions , 1992 .

[44]  Pramila Rao,et al.  International survey research , 2009 .