The potential impact of the National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance on treatment eligibility in the USA: an update in NHANES 2005–2008

SummaryThis analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005–2008 data describes the prevalence of risk factors for osteoporosis and the proportions of men and postmenopausal women age 50 years and older who are candidates for treatment to lower fracture risk, according to the new Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)-based National Osteoporosis Foundation Clinician’s Guide.IntroductionIt is important to update estimates of the proportions of the older US population considered eligible for pharmacologic treatment for osteoporosis for purposes of understanding the health care burden of this disease.MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study of the NHANES 2005–2008 data in 3,608 men and women aged 50 years and older. Variables in the analysis included race/ethnicity, age, lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density, risk factor profiles, and FRAX 10-year fracture probabilities.ResultsThe prevalence of osteoporosis of the femoral neck ranged from 6.0% in non-Hispanic black to 12.6% in Mexican American women. Spinal osteoporosis was more prevalent among Mexican American women (24.4%) than among either non-Hispanic blacks (5.3%) or non-Hispanic whites (10.9%). Treatment eligibility was similar in Mexican American and non-Hispanic white women (32.0% and 32.8%) and higher than it was in non-Hispanic black women (11.0%). Treatment eligibility among men was 21.1% in non-Hispanic whites, 12.6% in Mexican Americans, and 3.0% in non-Hispanic blacks.ConclusionsNineteen percent of older men and 30% of older women in the USA are at sufficient risk for fracture to warrant consideration for pharmacotherapy.

[1]  Claus Christiansen,et al.  Diagnosis of Osteoporosis , 1992, Southern medical journal.

[2]  S. Mckinlay Issues in design, measurement, and analysis for menopause research , 1994, Experimental Gerontology.

[3]  H. Wahner,et al.  Updated Data on Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Levels of US Adults , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[4]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. , 2001, JAMA.

[5]  S. Silverman,et al.  Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000 , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  G. Hawker,et al.  Population Trends in BMD Testing, Treatment, and Hip and Wrist Fracture Rates: Are the Hip Fracture Projections Wrong? , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[7]  T. Travison,et al.  Race/ethnic differences in bone mineral density in men , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[8]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis‐Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025 , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  S. Silverman,et al.  Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Position Development Conference. , 2008, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[10]  M. Leonard,et al.  Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and executive summary of the 2007 ISCD Pediatric Position Development Conference. , 2008, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[11]  L. Melton,et al.  Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA , 2008, Osteoporosis International.

[12]  J. Kanis,et al.  The effects of a FRAX® revision for the USA , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[13]  D. Kiel,et al.  Application of the National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines to postmenopausal women and men: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  J. Kanis,et al.  The potential impact of new National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance on treatment patterns , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[15]  S. Cummings,et al.  Estimates of the Proportion of Older White Women Who Would Be Recommended for Pharmacologic Treatment by the New U.S. National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  Thuy-Tien L. Dam,et al.  Estimates of the Proportion of Older White Men Who Would Be Recommended for Pharmacologic Treatment by the New US National Osteoporosis Foundation Guidelines , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  L. Melton,et al.  Changes in femur neck bone density in US adults between 1988–1994 and 2005–2008: demographic patterns and possible determinants , 2012, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  N. Watts,et al.  Estimating bisphosphonate use and fracture reduction among US women aged 45 years and older, 2001–2008 , 2011, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.