Skill-Oriented and Performance-Driven Adaptive Curricula for Training in Robot-Assisted Surgery Using Simulators: A Feasibility Study

Objective: Virtual Reality (VR) simulators represent a remarkable educational opportunity in order to acquire and refine surgical practical skills. Nevertheless, there exists no consensus regarding a standard curriculum of simulation-based training. This study introduces an automatic, adaptive curriculum where the training session is real-time scheduled on the basis of the trainee's performances. Methods: An experimental study using the master console of the da Vinci Research Kit (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, US) was carried out to test this approach. Tasks involving fundamental skills of robotic surgery were designed and simulated in VR. Twelve participants without medical background along with twelve medical residents were randomly and equally divided into two groups: a control group, self-managing the training session, and an experimental group, undergoing the proposed adaptive training. Results: The performances of the experimental users were significantly better with respect to the ones of the control group after training (non-medical: p < 0.01; medical: p = 0.02). This trend was analogous in the non-medical and medical populations and no significant difference was identified between these two classes (even in the baseline assessment). Conclusion: The analysis of the learning of the involved surgical skills highlighted how the proposed adaptive training managed to better identify and compensate for the trainee's gaps. The absence of initial difference between the non-medical and medical users underlines that robotic surgical devices require specific training before clinical practice. Significance: This feasibility study could pave the way towards the improvement of simulation-based training curricula.

[1]  M. Schijven,et al.  The Heidelberg VR Score: development and validation of a composite score for laparoscopic virtual reality training , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  Peter Wolf,et al.  When a robot teaches humans: Automated feedback selection accelerates motor learning , 2019, Science Robotics.

[3]  Susy Macqueen,et al.  Validity , 1973, Just Algorithms.

[4]  J. Rosser,et al.  Objective evaluation of a laparoscopic surgical skill program for residents and senior surgeons. , 1998, Archives of surgery.

[5]  A. Lanfranco,et al.  Robotic Surgery: A Current Perspective , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Felix Nickel,et al.  Skills in minimally invasive and open surgery show limited transferability to robotic surgery: results from a prospective study , 2018, Surgical Endoscopy.

[7]  D. Gaba The future vision of simulation in health care , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[8]  Mauro Ferrari,et al.  Performances on simulator and da Vinci robot on subjects with and without surgical background , 2018, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[9]  I. Gill,et al.  Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[10]  James A. Young,et al.  Robotic Surgical Training in an Academic Institution , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[11]  J. Gould,et al.  Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review , 2016, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  Nima Enayati,et al.  Skill-based human–robot cooperation in tele-operated path tracking , 2017, Autonomous Robots.

[13]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Effect of real-time virtual reality-based teaching cues on learning needle passing for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial , 2020, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[14]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  An open-source research kit for the da Vinci® Surgical System , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[15]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  An Evaluation of the Feasibility, Validity, and Reliability of Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in the Operating Room , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[16]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Uncontrolled Manifold Analysis of Arm Joint Angle Variability During Robotic Teleoperation and Freehand Movement of Surgeons and Novices , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  T. Grantcharov,et al.  Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[18]  Anne-Sophie Nyssen,et al.  Comparison of learning curves and skill transfer between classical and robotic laparoscopy according to the viewing conditions: implications for training. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[19]  Li-Ming Su,et al.  Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy--critical analysis of the results. , 2006, European urology.

[20]  Prokar Dasgupta,et al.  An over-view of robot assisted surgery curricula and the status of their validation. , 2015, International journal of surgery.

[21]  T. Guzzo,et al.  Robotic surgical training of the urologic oncologist. , 2009, Urologic oncology.

[22]  I. Leitman,et al.  General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training. , 2015, Journal of surgical education.

[23]  A. Darzi,et al.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[24]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Performance-based Adaptive Curriculum for Robotic Surgical Training: a Pilot Study , 2018, 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[25]  Chilin Shih,et al.  An adaptive training program for tone acquisition , 2010, Speech Prosody 2010.

[26]  J. J. Jakimowicz,et al.  Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[27]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  The role of simulation in urological training - A quantitative study of practice and opinions. , 2016, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[28]  Michael Fordis,et al.  Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. , 2006, JAMA.

[29]  A. Ziv,et al.  Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. , 2006, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[30]  Ziheng Wang,et al.  Deep learning with convolutional neural network for objective skill evaluation in robot-assisted surgery , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[31]  Nanna Jo Borgersen,et al.  Gathering Validity Evidence for Surgical Simulation: A Systematic Review , 2018, Annals of surgery.

[32]  Henry C. Lin,et al.  JHU-ISI Gesture and Skill Assessment Working Set ( JIGSAWS ) : A Surgical Activity Dataset for Human Motion Modeling , 2014 .

[33]  Sebastian Bodenstedt,et al.  Development and validation of a sensor- and expert model-based training system for laparoscopic surgery: the iSurgeon , 2017, Surgical Endoscopy.

[34]  Thomas S. Lendvay,et al.  Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator , 2008, Journal of robotic surgery.

[35]  S. Maeso,et al.  Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in Abdominal Surgery Compared With That of Laparoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[36]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery. , 2016, European urology.

[37]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[38]  Faouzi Ghorbel,et al.  A simple and efficient approach for 3D mesh approximate convex decomposition , 2009, 2009 16th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[39]  Nabeel A. Arain,et al.  Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. , 2012, Surgery.

[40]  S Duke Herrell,et al.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? , 2005, Urology.

[41]  A. Darzi,et al.  Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  Jeannie MacDonald,et al.  Self-assessment in simulation-based surgical skills training. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[43]  Nima Enayati,et al.  Robotic Assistance-as-Needed for Enhanced Visuomotor Learning in Surgical Robotics Training: An Experimental Study , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[44]  Jie Cai,et al.  Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[45]  Rajesh Aggarwal,et al.  Resident perceptions of advanced laparoscopic skills training , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[46]  P. Stricker,et al.  Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases. , 2014, European urology.

[47]  Jon C. Gould,et al.  Validation of a virtual reality-based robotic surgical skills curriculum , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[48]  M. Lerner,et al.  Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[49]  A. Okamura Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery , 2009, Current opinion in urology.