Anthropomorphic design of robotic arm trajectories in assembly cells

BACKGROUND: Anthropomorphism is attribution of human form or behavior to non-human agents. Its application in a robot increases occupational safety and user acceptance and reduces the mental effort needed to anticipate robot behavior. OBJECTIVE: The research question focuses on how the anthropomorphic trajectory and velocity profile of a virtual gantry robot affects the predictability of its behavior in a placement task. METHODS: To investigate the research question, we developed a virtual environment consisting of a robotized assembly cell. The robot was given human movements, acquired through the use of an infrared based motion capture system. The experiment compared anthropomorphic and constant velocity profiles. The trajectories were based on human movements of the hand-arm system. The task of the participants was to predict the target position of the placing movement as accurately and quickly as possible. RESULTS: Results show that the anthropomorphic velocity profile leads to a significantly shorter prediction time (α = 0.05). Moreover, the error rate and the mental effort were significantly less for the anthropomorphic velocity profile. Based on these findings, a speed-accuracy trade-off can be excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Participants were able to estimate and predict the target position of the presented movement significantly faster and more accurately when the robot was controlled by the human-like velocity profile.

[1]  Carl F. DiSalvo,et al.  From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design , 2003, DPPI '03.

[2]  Christian Brecher,et al.  Cognitive Control Technology for a Self-Optimizing Robot Based Assembly Cell , 2008 .

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  F. Binkofski,et al.  Can Machines Think? Interaction and Perspective Taking with Robots Investigated via fMRI , 2008, PloS one.

[5]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[6]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Human-robot interaction: Developing trust in robots , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  Christian Brecher,et al.  Towards Anthropomorphic Movements for Industrial Robots , 2013, HCI.

[8]  E. Guizzo,et al.  The rise of the robot worker , 2012, IEEE Spectrum.

[9]  Christopher M. Schlick,et al.  Using Anthropomorphism to Improve the Human-Machine Interaction in Industrial Environments (Part II) , 2013, HCI.

[10]  Jessie Y. C. Chen,et al.  Antecedents of trust in human-robot collaborations , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[11]  H. Luczak,et al.  Let's talk: anthropomorphization as means to cope with stress of interacting with technical devices , 2003, Ergonomics.

[12]  Alois Knoll,et al.  Human-robot interaction in handing-over tasks , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[13]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  C. Nass,et al.  Machines and Mindlessness , 2000 .

[15]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Anthropomorphism in the factory - a paradigm change? , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).