Efficiency of an enhanced linear optical Bell-state measurement scheme with realistic imperfections

We compare the standard 50%-efficient single beam splitter method for Bell-state measurement to a proposed 75%-efficient auxiliary-photon-enhanced scheme [W. P. Grice, Phys. Rev. A 84, 042331 (2011)] in light of realistic conditions. The two schemes are compared with consideration for high input state photon loss, auxiliary state photon loss, detector inefficiency and coupling loss, detector dark counts, and non-number-resolving detectors. We also analyze the two schemes when multiplexed arrays of non-number-resolving detectors are used. Furthermore, we explore the possibility of utilizing spontaneous parametric down-conversion as the auxiliary photon pair source required by the enhanced scheme. In these different cases, we determine the bounds on the detector parameters at which the enhanced scheme becomes superior to the standard scheme and describe the impact of the different imperfections on measurement success rate and discrimination fidelity. This is done using a combination of numeric and analytic techniques. For many of the cases discussed, the size of the Hilbert space and the number of measurement outcomes can be very large, which makes direct numerical solutions computationally costly. To alleviate this problem, all of our numerical computations are performed using pure states. This requires tracking the loss modes until measurement and treating dark counts as variations on measurement outcomes rather than modifications to the state itself. In addition, we provide approximate analytic expressions that illustrate the effect of different imperfections on the Bell-state analyzer quality.

[1]  Christoph Simon,et al.  Practical quantum repeaters with parametric down-conversion sources , 2015, 1505.03470.

[2]  S. Guha,et al.  Fundamental rate-loss tradeoff for optical quantum key distribution , 2014, Nature Communications.

[3]  C. Simon,et al.  Entanglement over global distances via quantum repeaters with satellite links , 2014, 1410.5384.

[4]  P Chan,et al.  Efficient Bell state analyzer for time-bin qubits with fast-recovery WSi superconducting single photon detectors. , 2014, Optics express.

[5]  R. Girard,et al.  Corrigendum: A comprehensive design and performance analysis of low Earth orbit satellite quantum communication (2013 New J. Phys. 15 023006) , 2014 .

[6]  C. Simon,et al.  Rate-loss analysis of an efficient quantum repeater architecture , 2014, 1404.7183.

[7]  Peter van Loock,et al.  3/4-Efficient Bell measurement with passive linear optics and unentangled ancillae. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[8]  R. Ricken,et al.  Spectral multiplexing for scalable quantum photonics using an atomic frequency comb quantum memory and feed-forward control. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[9]  R. Ricken,et al.  Two-photon interference of weak coherent laser pulses recalled from separate solid-state quantum memories , 2013, Nature Communications.

[10]  L. Zhang,et al.  Direct and full-scale experimental verifications towards ground–satellite quantum key distribution , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[11]  F. Marsili,et al.  Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[12]  C. M. Natarajan,et al.  Superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors: physics and applications , 2012, 1204.5560.

[13]  Premjeet Kumar,et al.  Antibunched emission of photon pairs via quantum Zeno blockade. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[14]  W. Grice Arbitrarily complete Bell-state measurement using only linear optical elements , 2011 .

[15]  J Fan,et al.  Invited review article: Single-photon sources and detectors. , 2011, The Review of scientific instruments.

[16]  Isabelle Sagnes,et al.  Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs , 2010, Nature.

[17]  R. Hadfield Single-photon detectors for optical quantum information applications , 2009 .

[18]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Quantum repeaters based on atomic ensembles and linear optics , 2009, 0906.2699.

[19]  P. Villoresi,et al.  Feasibility of satellite quantum key distribution , 2009, 0903.2160.

[20]  Jacob M. Taylor,et al.  Quantum repeater with encoding , 2008, 0809.3629.

[21]  H. J. Kimble,et al.  The quantum internet , 2008, Nature.

[22]  Andrea Fiore,et al.  Superconducting nanowire photon-number-resolving detector at telecommunication wavelengths , 2008 .

[23]  Aaron J. Miller,et al.  Counting near-infrared single-photons with 95% efficiency. , 2008, Optics express.

[24]  Leaf A. Jiang,et al.  Photon-number-resolving detector with 10 bits of resolution , 2007 .

[25]  N. Gisin,et al.  Quantum repeaters with photon pair sources and multimode memories. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[26]  Aaron J. Miller,et al.  Noise-free high-efficiency photon-number-resolving detectors , 2005, quant-ph/0506175.

[27]  N. Gisin,et al.  Long-distance entanglement swapping with photons from separated sources , 2004, quant-ph/0409093.

[28]  N. Gisin,et al.  High-quality asynchronous heralded single-photon source at telecom wavelength , 2004, quant-ph/0408136.

[29]  D. Bouwmeester,et al.  Quantum entanglement of a large number of photons. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[30]  I. Walmsley,et al.  Fiber-assisted detection with photon number resolution. , 2003, Optics letters.

[31]  D. Bouwmeester,et al.  Theory of an entanglement laser. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[32]  N. Gisin,et al.  Long-distance teleportation of qubits at telecommunication wavelengths , 2003, Nature.

[33]  J. Cirac,et al.  Long-distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics , 2001, Nature.

[34]  N. Lutkenhaus,et al.  Maximum efficiency of a linear-optical Bell-state analyzer , 2000, quant-ph/0007058.

[35]  Gisin,et al.  Quantum cryptography using entangled photons in energy-time bell states , 1999, Physical review letters.

[36]  P. Kok,et al.  Detection devices in entanglement-based optical state preparation , 1999, quant-ph/9910084.

[37]  Wolfgang Dür,et al.  Quantum Repeaters: The Role of Imperfect Local Operations in Quantum Communication , 1998 .

[38]  N. Lutkenhaus,et al.  Bell measurements for teleportation , 1998, quant-ph/9809063.

[39]  N. Gisin,et al.  Pulsed Energy-Time Entangled Twin-Photon Source for Quantum Communication , 1998, quant-ph/9809034.

[40]  N. Yoran,et al.  Methods for Reliable Teleportation , 1998, quant-ph/9808040.

[41]  N. Gisin,et al.  Violation of Bell Inequalities by Photons More Than 10 km Apart , 1998, quant-ph/9806043.

[42]  Richard J. Hughes,et al.  Practical free-space quantum key distribution over 1 km , 1998, quant-ph/9805071.

[43]  N. Gisin,et al.  Experimental demonstration of quantum correlations over more than 10 km , 1997, quant-ph/9707042.

[44]  Weinfurter,et al.  Dense coding in experimental quantum communication. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[45]  Shih,et al.  New high-intensity source of polarization-entangled photon pairs. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[46]  Mann,et al.  Measurement of the Bell operator and quantum teleportation. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[47]  Ekert,et al.  "Event-ready-detectors" Bell experiment via entanglement swapping. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[48]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[49]  D. Dieks Communication by EPR devices , 1982 .

[50]  W. Wootters,et al.  A single quantum cannot be cloned , 1982, Nature.