An expectancy-equity model of productive system performance

Abstract Although numerous behavioral variables (e.g., personality traits, incentives, nature of supervision) have documented relationships with quantity and quality of output, i.e., performance, in production systems, existing production and operations management models are dominated by technological variables. The article addresses three questions: 1. Which technological and behavioral variables influence productive system performance? 2. How do behavioral and technological variables interact? 3. Which variables are most important under different circumstances in determining performance? An expectancy-equity model, patterned on research by Lawler [22], presents proposed relationships among variables in production systems, which are classified along a continuum from high to low process predictability. Predominant determinants of performance in various types of systems (e.g., continuous process, job shop, R&D project) are considered in light of the model. Implications for designers and analysts of productive systems and for future research are discussed.

[1]  L. Sprague.  Needed Research in Organizational Behavior: A Production/Operations Management Perspective , 1977 .

[2]  Everett Ernest Adam.  An experimental analysis of the change in performance quantity and quality on a routine, repetitive task , 1970 .

[3]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  The "practical significance" of Locke's theory of goal setting. , 1975 .

[4]  J. Garrett,et al.  The Protestant Ethic Scale as a predictor of repetitive work performance. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Motivation in Work Organizations , 1975 .

[6]  Ivars Avots.  Why Does Project Management Fail? , 1969 .

[7]  Laurie A. Broedling,et al.  Relationship of internal-external control to work motivation and performance in an expectancy model. , 1975 .

[8]  J. M. Lockhart,et al.  Effect of rate and level of lowered finger surface temperature on manual performance. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  E. Adam,et al.  The Application of Behavioral Conditioning Procedures to the Problems of Quality Control , 1971 .

[10]  E. Lawler,et al.  Effects of inequity produced by underpayment on work output, work quality, and attitudes toward the work. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  J. S. Adams,et al.  EFFECTS OF WAGE INEQUITIES ON WORK QUALITY. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[12]  P. Fitts.  Cognitive aspects of information processing. 3. Set for speed versus accuracy. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Effect of external reward on conformity and accuracy responses in a group pressure situation. , 1965 .

[14]  E. Lawler,et al.  Inequity reduction over time in an induced overpayment situation , 1968 .

[15]  Theodorus Leonardus Stok.  The worker and quality control , 1965 .

[16]  E. Lawler,et al.  Employee reactions to a pay incentive plan. , 1973 .

[17]  S. DAVID M. KING,et al.  Productivity and Social Organization , 1958, Nature.

[18]  E. T. Klemmer,et al.  Productivity and errors in two keying tasks: A field study. , 1962 .

[19]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  The role of task-goal attributes in employee performance. , 1974 .

[20]  V. Catano.  Relation of Improved Performance through Verbal Praise to Source of Praise , 1975 .

[21]  E. A. Fleishman,et al.  Evaluation of an abilities classification system for integrating and generalizing human performance research findings: An application to vigilance tasks. , 1973 .

[22]  G. S. Snoddy.  Learning and stability: a psychophysiological analysis of a case of motor learning with clinical applications. , 1926 .

[23]  Mark S. Sanders,et al.  Human Factors in Engineering and Design , 1957 .

[24]  B. L. Foote,et al.  The Effect of Inspector Accuracy on the Type I and Type II Errors of Common Sampling Techniques , 1975 .

[25]  Edward E. Lawler,et al.  Pay and organizational effectiveness : a psychological view , 1972 .

[26]  L. L. Cummings.  Needed Research in Production/Operations Management: A Behavioral Perspective , 1977 .

[27]  J. Hackman,et al.  Employee reactions to job characteristics. , 1971 .

[28]  Joan C. Woodward.  Management and technology , 1958 .

[29]  J. F. Mackworth.  PERFORMANCE DECREMENT IN VIGILANCE, THRESHOLD, AND HIGH-SPEED PERCEPTUAL MOTOR TASKS. , 1964, Canadian journal of psychology.

[30]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[31]  E. Adam.  An analysis of changes in performance quality with operant conditioning procedures. , 1972 .

[32]  Kenneth E. Case,et al.  The Effect of Inspection Error on Average Outgoing Quality , 1975 .