High-fidelity multipoint aerostructural optimization of a high aspect ratio tow-steered composite wing

Composite materials have been playing a major role in modern aircraft design due to their high stiffness and strength to weight ratio. While the advantages of composite structures over their metallic counterparts is significant, it is possible to improve even further on the benefits offered by traditional composites through the use of novel composite manufacturing methods. One such method is automated fiber placement, whereby each layer of the laminate is laid up with spatially steered fiber orientations, as opposed to the traditional method, where the fiber direction is fixed for each layer. While these new “tow-steered” composites can potentially provide additional aeroelastic tailoring when applied aircraft wing design, it is not clear how to fully take advantage of this new design freedom. To address this, we use high-fidelity gradient-based aerostructural optimization to assess the relative performance of tow-steered composites compared to conventional composites, as well as aluminum. The aircraft configuration used in this work is a high aspect ratio variant of the Common Research Model (CRM). When comparing the optimal conventional composite and optimal aluminum designs we find an improvement of roughly 8.7% in fuel burn and a 39% reduction in structural weight. The tow-steered designs yield improvements of 0.4% in fuel burn and 10% in structural weight when compared to conventional composites.

[1]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Surrogate models and mixtures of experts in aerodynamic performance prediction for mission analysis , 2014 .

[2]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multipoint High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization of a Transport Aircraft Configuration , 2014 .

[3]  Graeme J. Kennedy,et al.  Improved constraint-aggregation methods , 2015 .

[4]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization , 2015 .

[5]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A parallel aerostructural optimization framework for aircraft design studies , 2014 .

[6]  Graeme J. Kennedy,et al.  Scalable Parallel Approach for High-Fidelity Steady-State Aeroelastic Analysis and Adjoint Derivative Computations , 2014 .

[7]  Timothy R. Brooks,et al.  High-fidelity Aerostructural Optimization of a High Aspect Ratio Tow-steered Wing , 2016 .

[8]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Surrogate models and mixtures of experts in aerodynamic performance prediction for aircraft mission analysis , 2015 .

[9]  Georgi Kalitzin,et al.  Unsteady turbomachinery computations using massively parallel platforms , 2006 .

[10]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  An adaptive approach to constraint aggregation using adjoint sensitivity analysis , 2007 .

[11]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Development of a Common Research Model for Applied CFD Validation Studies , 2008 .

[12]  Carol D. Wieseman,et al.  Trim and Structural Optimization of Subsonic Transport Wings using Nonconventional Aeroelastic Tailoring , 2014 .

[13]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A laminate parametrization technique for discrete ply-angle problems with manufacturing constraints , 2013 .

[14]  Carol D. Wieseman,et al.  Aeroelastic Tailoring of the NASA Common Research Model via Novel Material and Structural Configurations , 2014 .

[15]  Jonathan E. Cooper,et al.  Optimization of Tow-Steered Composite Wing Laminates for Aeroelastic Tailoring , 2014 .

[16]  Graeme J. Kennedy.  Strategies for adaptive optimization with aggregation constraints using interior-point methods , 2015 .

[17]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  pyOpt: a Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization , 2011, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[18]  Cody A. Paige,et al.  Automatic Differentiation Adjoint of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Equations with a Turbulence Model , 2013 .

[19]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  High-fidelity aerostructural optimization considering buffet onset , 2015 .

[20]  S. Brown,et al.  Displacement extrapolations for CFD+CSM aeroelastic analysis , 1997 .

[21]  J. L. Walsh,et al.  Efficient structural optimization for multiple load cases using adjoint sensitivities , 2001 .

[22]  J. Alonso,et al.  ADjoint: An Approach for the Rapid Development of Discrete Adjoint Solvers , 2006 .

[23]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A parallel finite-element framework for large-scale gradient-based design optimization of high-performance structures , 2014 .

[24]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Parallel Solution Methods for Aerostructural Analysis and Design Optimization , 2010 .

[25]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Morphing Trailing Edge Using Multipoint Aerostructural Design Optimization , 2016 .

[26]  Graeme J. Kennedy,et al.  High aspect ratiowing design: Optimal aerostructural tradeoffs for the next generation of materials , 2014 .

[27]  Erik Lund,et al.  Optimization strategies for discrete multi-material stiffness optimization , 2011 .

[28]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A Scalable Parallel Approach for High-Fidelity Aerostructural Analysis and Optimization , 2012 .

[29]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  A Comparison of Metallic, Composite and Nanocomposite Optimal Transonic Transport Wings , 2014 .

[30]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..