Hormone‐induced nucleosome positioning in the MMTV promoter is reversible
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Chambon,et al. Folding of the DNA double helix in chromatin-like structures from simian virus 40. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[2] E. Bradbury,et al. Histone acetylation reduces nucleosome core particle linking number change , 1989, Cell.
[3] M. C. Huber,et al. Genomic position effects lead to an inefficient reorganization of nucleosomes in the 5'-regulatory region of the chicken lysozyme locus in transgenic mice. , 1996, Nucleic acids research.
[4] C. Allis,et al. The language of covalent histone modifications , 2000, Nature.
[5] C. Woodcock,et al. Nucleosome positioning by the winged helix transcription factor HNF3. , 1998, Genes & development.
[6] M. Dunaway,et al. Modeling transcriptional regulation using microinjection into Xenopus oocytes. , 1999, Methods.
[7] T. Richmond,et al. Positioning and stability of nucleosomes on MMTV 3'LTR sequences. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.
[8] M. Beato,et al. Antiprogestins prevent progesterone receptor binding to hormone responsive elements in vivo. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[9] W. Pennie,et al. The Position and Length of the Steroid-Dependent Hypersensitive Region in the Mouse Mammary Tumor Virus Long Terminal Repeat Are Invariant despite Multiple Nucleosome B Frames , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[10] T. Archer,et al. Chromatin remodelling by the glucocorticoid receptor requires the BRG1 complex , 1998, Nature.
[11] K. Zaret,et al. An active tissue-specific enhancer and bound transcription factors existing in a precisely positioned nucleosomal array , 1993, Cell.
[12] A. Wolffe,et al. Characterization of a chromatin remodelling activity in Xenopus oocytes. , 1999, European journal of biochemistry.
[13] R. Kingston,et al. ATP-dependent remodeling and acetylation as regulators of chromatin fluidity. , 1999, Genes & development.
[14] Myles Brown,et al. Cofactor Dynamics and Sufficiency in Estrogen Receptor–Regulated Transcription , 2000, Cell.
[15] A. Wolffe,et al. Targeting of N‐CoR and histone deacetylase 3 by the oncoprotein v‐ErbA yields a chromatin infrastructure‐dependent transcriptional repression pathway , 2000, The EMBO journal.
[16] A. Wolffe,et al. DNA methylation and histone deacetylation in the control of gene expression: basic biochemistry to human development and disease. , 2000, Gene expression.
[17] G. Rousseau,et al. Structure-activity relationships for glucocorticoids-I. Determination of receptor binding and biological activity. , 1977, Journal of steroid biochemistry.
[18] E. Baulieu,et al. RU486 (mifepristone): mechanisms of action and clinical uses. , 1997, Annual review of medicine.
[19] G. Hager. Understanding nuclear receptor function: from DNA to chromatin to the interphase nucleus. , 2001, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.
[20] T. Perlmann,et al. Specific glucocorticoid receptor binding to DNA reconstituted in a nucleosome. , 1988, The EMBO journal.
[21] M. Beato,et al. Transcription factor access to chromatin. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.
[22] P. Chambon,et al. Type II antagonists impair the DNA binding of steroid hormone receptors without affecting dimerization , 1993, The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
[23] P. Chambon,et al. The hormone-binding domains of the estrogen and glucocorticoid receptors contain an inducible transcription activation function , 1988, Cell.
[24] T. Edlund,et al. Sequence-specific interactions of nuclear factors with the insulin gene enhancer , 1986, Cell.
[25] T. Reich,et al. Nucleocytoplasmic Trafficking of Steroid-free Glucocorticoid Receptor* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[26] G. Hager,et al. Transcription factor access is mediated by accurately positioned nucleosomes on the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter , 1991, Molecular and cellular biology.
[27] T. Richmond,et al. Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.
[28] M. Beato,et al. Assembly of MMTV promoter minichromosomes with positioned nucleosomes precludes NF1 access but not restriction enzyme cleavage. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.
[29] P. Eriksson,et al. Protein-protein contacts in the glucocorticoid receptor homodimer influence its DNA binding properties. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.
[30] A. Wolffe,et al. Superhelical stress and nucleosome‐mediated repression of 5S RNA gene transcription in vitro. , 1991, The EMBO journal.
[31] J. Mymryk,et al. Dissection of progesterone receptor-mediated chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation in vivo. , 1995, Genes & development.
[32] Keith R. Yamamoto,et al. Reversible and persistent changes in chromatin structure accompany activation of a glucocorticoid-dependent enhancer element , 1984, Cell.
[33] M. Beato,et al. Hormone induces binding of receptors and transcription factors to a rearranged nucleosome on the MMTV promoter in vivo. , 1995, The EMBO journal.
[34] B. Gloss,et al. In vivo protein–DNA interactions in a glucocorticoid response element require the presence of the hormone , 1986, Nature.
[35] R. Simpson,et al. Nucleosome positioning: occurrence, mechanisms, and functional consequences. , 1991, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.
[36] H. Richard-Foy,et al. Sequence‐specific positioning of nucleosomes over the steroid‐inducible MMTV promoter. , 1987, The EMBO journal.
[37] J. Workman,et al. Promoter targeting and chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF complex. , 2000, Current opinion in genetics & development.
[38] K. Yamamoto,et al. Two signals mediate hormone‐dependent nuclear localization of the glucocorticoid receptor. , 1987, The EMBO journal.
[39] R. Tjian,et al. Orchestrated response: a symphony of transcription factors for gene control. , 2000, Genes & development.
[40] M. Beato,et al. Nucleosome positioning modulates accessibility of regulatory proteins to the mouse mammary tumor virus promoter , 1990, Cell.
[41] G. Almouzni,et al. Hormone activation induces nucleosome positioning in vivo , 2000, The EMBO journal.
[42] K. Zaret,et al. An early developmental transcription factor complex that is more stable on nucleosome core particles than on free DNA. , 1999, Molecular cell.
[43] J. McNally,et al. The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.
[44] M. Perricaudet,et al. Receptors bound to antiprogestin form abortive complexes with hormone responsive elements , 1988, Nature.
[45] G. Ryffel,et al. Two types of antiprogestins identified by their differential action in transcriptionally active extracts from T47D cells. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.
[46] G. Hager,et al. Nucleosomes reconstituted in vitro on mouse mammary tumor virus B region DNA occupy multiple translational and rotational frames. , 1995, Biochemistry.
[47] A. Wolffe,et al. Review: chromatin structural features and targets that regulate transcription. , 2000, Journal of structural biology.
[48] S. Elgin,et al. Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation , 1994, Journal of cellular biochemistry.
[49] M. Stallcup,et al. GRIP1, a novel mouse protein that serves as a transcriptional coactivator in yeast for the hormone binding domains of steroid receptors. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[50] G. Hager,et al. Nucleosome positioning on the MMTV LTR results from the frequency-biased occupancy of multiple frames. , 1995, Genes & development.
[51] A. Wolffe,et al. Replication-coupled chromatin assembly is required for the repression of basal transcription in vivo. , 1993, Genes & development.
[52] Dimitris Thanos,et al. Ordered Recruitment of Chromatin Modifying and General Transcription Factors to the IFN-β Promoter , 2000, Cell.
[53] R. Kingston,et al. BRG-1 Is Recruited to Estrogen-Responsive Promoters and Cooperates with Factors Involved in Histone Acetylation , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.
[54] W. Gilbert,et al. A new method for sequencing DNA. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.