Landscape controls on nitrate removal in stream riparian zones

[1] We examined how landscape hydrogeologic characteristics influence groundwater nitrate removal by eight stream riparian sites on glacial till and outwash landscapes in southern Ontario, Canada. During high water table periods in 2000–2002, mean NO3−-N input concentrations from adjacent cropland to the riparian sites ranged from 0.15 to 44.7 mg L−1. Seven of the eight sites had a mean nitrate removal efficiency of >90%. This removal occurred within the first 15 m of the riparian zone at three sites with loamy sand and sandy loam soils overlying a shallow confining layer at 1–2 m. However, at four of five sites with more conductive sand and cobble sediments the width required for 90% nitrate removal varied from >25 m to a maximum of 176 m at a site with a confining layer at 6 m. Sites linked to an extensive thick (>6 m) upland aquifer with a slope gradient of >15% at the riparian perimeter had high nitrate inputs throughout the year and were large nitrate sinks. Sites with gentle topography (<4–5%) and <2 m of permeable sediments were minor nitrate sinks because of small nitrate inputs that were limited to the late autumn-spring period. A conceptual model linking landscape hydrogeologic characteristics to riparian zone nitrate removal capacity is developed to understand and predict the effectiveness of riparian buffers at the landscape scale.

[1]  T. Burt,et al.  Denitrification in riparian buffer zones : the role of floodplain hydrology , 1999 .

[2]  A. Butturini,et al.  Nitrogen Removal by Riparian Buffers along a European Climatic Gradient: Patterns and Factors of Variation , 2003, Ecosystems.

[3]  S. J. Altman,et al.  Dilution of Nonpoint-Source Nitrate in Groundwater , 1995 .

[4]  M. Dosskey,et al.  Toward Quantifying Water Pollution Abatement in Response to Installing Buffers on Crop Land , 2001, Environmental management.

[5]  D. Q. Kellogg,et al.  Identifying riparian sinks for watershed nitrate using soil surveys. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[6]  K. Devito,et al.  SULPHATE DYNAMICS IN RELATION TO GROUNDWATER–SURFACE WATER INTERACTIONS IN HEADWATER WETLANDS OF THE SOUTHERN CANADIAN SHIELD , 1997 .

[7]  Alan R. Hill,et al.  Nitrate dynamics in relation to lithology and hydrologic flow path in a river riparian zone. , 2000 .

[8]  Irena F. Creed,et al.  Landscape controls on phosphorus loading to boreal lakes: implications for the potential impacts of forest harvesting , 2000 .

[9]  J. Böhlke,et al.  Combined Use of Groundwater Dating, Chemical, and Isotopic Analyses to Resolve the History and Fate of Nitrate Contamination in Two Agricultural Watersheds, Atlantic Coastal Plain, Maryland , 1995 .

[10]  J. Gilliam,et al.  Riparian Wetlands and Water Quality. , 1994, Journal of environmental quality.

[11]  M. K. Landon,et al.  Denitrification in the recharge area and discharge area of a transient agricultural nitrate plume in a glacial outwash sand aquifer, Minnesota , 2002 .

[12]  Arthur J. Gold,et al.  LANDSCAPE ATTRIBUTES AS CONTROLS ON GROITHD WATER NITRATE REMOVAL CAPACITY OF RIPARIAN ZONES 1 , 2001 .

[13]  G. Pinay,et al.  Groundwater nitrate dynamics in grass and poplar vegetated riparian buffer strips during the winter , 1993 .

[14]  L. Puckett,et al.  Using chemical, hydrologic, and age dating analysis to delineate redox processes and flow paths in the riparian zone of a glacial outwash aquifer‐stream system , 2002 .

[15]  B. Nilsson,et al.  Nitrate transformation and water movement in a wetland area , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[16]  R. B. Reneau,et al.  IMPACT OF RIPARIAN FOREST BUFFERS ON AGRICULTURAL NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION 1 , 1998 .

[17]  A. Butturini,et al.  Water table fluctuations in the riparian zone: comparative results from a pan-European experiment , 2002 .

[18]  J. Newbold,et al.  Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers in Chesapeake Bay Watersheds , 1997, Environmental management.

[19]  D. Correll,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forest , 1984 .

[20]  D. Weller,et al.  Nutrient Interception by a Riparian Forest Receiving Inputs from Adjacent Cropland , 1993 .

[21]  N. Roulet.  Hydrology of a headwater basin wetland: Groundwater discharge and wetland maintenance , 1990 .

[22]  A. Hill.  Ground water flow paths in relation to nitrogen chemistry in the near-stream zone , 1990, Hydrobiologia.

[23]  Alan R. Hill,et al.  Nitrate Removal in Stream Riparian Zones , 1996 .

[24]  H. Whiteley,et al.  GROUNDWATER NITRATE CONCENTRATIONS IN THE RIPARIAN ZONES OF TWO SOUTHERN ONTARIO STREAMS , 1999 .

[25]  K. Devito,et al.  Subsurface denitrification in a forest riparianzone: Interactions between hydrology and supplies ofnitrate and organic carbon , 2000 .

[26]  P. Vidon,et al.  Landscape controls on the hydrology of stream riparian zones , 2004 .

[27]  R. Lowrance.  Groundwater nitrate and denitrification in a coastal plain riparian forest , 1992 .

[28]  R. Lowrance.  Riparian Forest Ecosystems as Filters for Nonpoint-Source Pollution , 1998 .

[29]  A. Hill.  3 – Stream Chemistry and Riparian Zones , 2000 .

[30]  D. Weller,et al.  Groundwater/Surface Water Ecotones: Biological and Hydrological Interactions and Management Options: Failure of agricultural riparian buffers to protect surface waters from groundwater nitrate contamination , 1997 .

[31]  L. E. Asmussen,et al.  Riparian Forests as Nutrient Filters in Agricultural Watersheds , 1984 .

[32]  Paul W. Seelbach,et al.  GIS‐BASED HYIROLOGIC MODELING OF RIPARIAN AREAS: IMPLICATIONS FOR STREAM WATER QUALITY 1 , 2001 .