Computer-Assisted Screw Size and Insertion Trajectory Planning for Pedicle Screw Placement Surgery

Pathological conditions that cause instability of the spine are commonly treated by vertebral fixation involving pedicle screw placement surgery. However, existing methods for preoperative planning are based only on geometrical properties of vertebral structures (i.e., shape) without taking into account their structural properties (i.e., appearance). We propose a novel automated method for computer-assisted preoperative planning of the thoracic pedicle screw size and insertion trajectory. The proposed method extracts geometrical properties of vertebral structures by parametric modeling of vertebral bodies and pedicles in three dimensions (3D), and combines them with structural properties, evaluated through underlying image intensities in computed tomography (CT) images while considering the guidelines for pedicle screw design. The method was evaluated on 81 pedicles, obtained from 3D CT images of 11 patients that were appointed for pedicle screw placement surgery. In terms of mean absolute difference (MAD) and corresponding standard deviation (SD), the resulting high modeling accuracy of 0.39±0.31 mm for 3D vertebral body models and 0.31±0.25 mm for 3D pedicle models created an adequate anatomical frame for 3D pedicle screw models. When comparing the automatically obtained and manually defined plans for pedicle screw placement, a relatively high agreement was observed, with MAD ±SD of 0.4±0.4 mm for the screw diameter, 5.8±4.2 mm for the screw length, 2.0±1.4 mm for the pedicle crossing point and 7.6±5.8° for screw insertion angles. However, a statistically significant increase of 48±26% in the screw fastening strength in favor of the proposed automated method was observed in 99% of the cases.

[1]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies , 2001, Evolutionary Computation.

[2]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[3]  Boštjan Likar,et al.  Parametric modelling and segmentation of vertebral bodies in 3D CT and MR spine images , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Kernel-Based Object Tracking , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Pu Zhou,et al.  Generation of flat-top beam with phase-only liquid crystal spatial light modulators , 2010 .

[6]  H. An,et al.  Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: Morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Effect of Physiological Loads on Cortical and Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation , 2014, Spine.

[8]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Automated model-based vertebra detection, identification, and segmentation in CT images , 2009, Medical Image Anal..

[9]  Dong-Ho Lee,et al.  A Novel Method of Screw Placement for Extremely Small Thoracic Pedicles in Scoliosis , 2011, Spine.

[10]  P. Anderson,et al.  Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. , 2011, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  Wan Kyun Chung,et al.  Optimal surgical planning guidance for lumbar spinal fusion considering operational safety and vertebra–screw interface strength , 2012, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[12]  R. Wicker,et al.  Automatic determination of pedicle screw size, length, and trajectory from patient data , 2004, The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[13]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Statistical Interspace Models (SIMs): Application to Robust 3D Spine Segmentation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Shuo Li,et al.  Multi-Modality Vertebra Recognition in Arbitrary Views Using 3D Deformable Hierarchical Model , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Straight-Forward Versus Anatomic Trajectory Technique of Thoracic Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Biomechanical Analysis , 2003, Spine.

[16]  Shijian Cai,et al.  Thoracic Pedicle Morphometry in Different Body Height Population: A Three-Dimensional Study Using Reformatted Computed Tomography , 2011, Spine.

[17]  R. Lehman,et al.  Management of Osteoporosis in Spine Surgery , 2015, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[18]  M. M. Panjabi,et al.  Complexity of the thoracic spine pedicle anatomy , 2005, European Spine Journal.

[19]  U. Ahn,et al.  Pedicle Morphometry of Upper Thoracic Vertebrae: An Anatomic Study of 503 Cadaveric Specimens , 2014, Spine.

[20]  A Uneri,et al.  Known-component 3D–2D registration for quality assurance of spine surgery pedicle screw placement , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[22]  Martin Thaler,et al.  Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of computed tomographic 3D measurement of pedicles in scoliosis and size matching with pedicle screws , 2011, European Spine Journal.

[23]  Gali Dar,et al.  Vertebral body shape variation in the thoracic and lumbar spine: Characterization of its asymmetry and wedging , 2008, Clinical anatomy.

[24]  S. Li,et al.  Regression Segmentation for $M^{3}$ Spinal Images , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  D. Simon,et al.  Accuracy Requirements for Image-Guided Spinal Pedicle Screw Placement , 2001, Spine.

[26]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  Parametric modeling of the intervertebral disc space in 3D: Application to CT images of the lumbar spine , 2014, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[27]  André Mastmeyer,et al.  A hierarchical 3D segmentation method and the definition of vertebral body coordinate systems for QCT of the lumbar spine , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[28]  U. Ahn,et al.  Lower Thoracic Pedicle Morphometry: Male, Taller, and Heavier Specimens Have Bigger Pedicles , 2015, Spine.

[29]  L. Wiltse,et al.  Anatomic Analysis of Pedicle Cortical and Cancellous Diameter as Related to Screw Size , 1989, Spine.

[30]  Barr,et al.  Superquadrics and Angle-Preserving Transformations , 1981, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[31]  M. Rentschler,et al.  A new 3-dimensional method for measuring precision in surgical navigation and methods to optimize navigation accuracy , 2016, European Spine Journal.

[32]  Ahmed A. Aoude,et al.  Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review , 2015, European Spine Journal.

[33]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Framework for Automated Spine and Vertebrae Interpolation-Based Detection and Model-Based Segmentation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  H. Labelle,et al.  Spine Segmentation in Medical Images Using Manifold Embeddings and Higher-Order MRFs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[35]  Julien Cohen-Adad,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Spinal Cord and Spinal Canal Coupled With Vertebral Labeling , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Amir Manbachi,et al.  Guided pedicle screw insertion: techniques and training. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[37]  Boštjan Likar,et al.  VARIABILITY OF MANUAL AND COMPUTERIZED METHODS FOR MEASURING CORONAL VERTEBRAL INCLINATION IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IMAGES , 2015 .

[38]  Richard A. Robb,et al.  Toward Virtual Modeling and Templating for Enhanced Spine Surgery Planning , 2015 .

[39]  Stavros K Kourkoulis,et al.  Numerical simulation of bone screw induced pretension: the cases of under-tapping and conical profile. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[40]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Accurate Segmentation of Vertebral Bodies and Processes Using Statistical Shape Decomposition and Conditional Models , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[41]  R M Harrington,et al.  Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.