Spectrum Utilization and Congestion of IEEE 802.11 Networks in the 2.4 GHz ISM Band

Wi-Fi technology, plays a major role in society thanks to its widespread availability, ease of use and low cost. To assure its long term viability in terms of capacity and ability to share the spectrum efficiently, it is of paramount to study the spectrum utilization and congestion mechanisms in live environments. In this paper the service level in the 2.4 GHz ISM band is investigated with focus on todays IEEE 802.11 WLAN systems with support for the 802.11e extension. Here service level means the overall Quality of Service (QoS), i.e. can all devices fulfill their communication needs? A crosslayer approach is used, since the service level can be measured at several levels of the protocol stack. The focus is on monitoring at both the Physical (PHY) and the Medium Access Control (MAC) link layer simultaneously by performing respectively power measurements with a spectrum analyzer to assess spectrum utilization and packet sniffing to measure the congestion. Compared to traditional QoS analysis in 802.11 networks, packet sniffing allows to study the occurring congestion mechanisms more thoroughly. The monitoring is applied for the following two cases. First the influence of interference between WLAN networks sharing the same radio channel is investigated in a controlled environment. It turns out that retry rate, Clear-ToSend (CTS), Request-To-Send (RTS) and (Block) Acknowledgment (ACK) frames can be used to identify congestion, whereas the spectrum analyzer is employed to identify the source of interference. Secondly, live measurements are performed at three locations to identify this type of interference in real-live situations. Results show inefficient use of the wireless medium in certain scenarios, due to a large portion of management and control frames compared to data content frames (i.e. only 21% of the frames is identified as data frames).

[1]  David J. Thuente,et al.  Jamming Vulnerabilities of IEEE 802.11e , 2007, MILCOM 2007 - IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[2]  Ravi Narasimhan,et al.  Evaluation of contention free bursting in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs , 2005, IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005.

[3]  Ilkka Harjula,et al.  Performance of IEEE 802.11 based WLAN devices under various jamming signals , 2011, 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference.

[4]  John Sydor.  CORAL: A WiFi based cognitive radio development platform , 2010, 2010 7th International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems.

[5]  Shuji Tasaka,et al.  Effect of TXOP-Bursting and Transmission Error on Application-Level and User-Level QoS in Audio-Video Transmission with IEEE 802.11e EDCA , 2006, 2006 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[6]  Qiang Ni,et al.  Performance analysis and enhancements for IEEE 802.11e wireless networks , 2005, IEEE Network.

[7]  Katinka Wolter,et al.  Improving the Performance of IEEE 802.11e with an Advanced Scheduling Heuristic , 2006, EPEW.

[8]  LindgrenAnders,et al.  Quality of service schemes for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs , 2003 .

[9]  Ilenia Tinnirello,et al.  Understanding 802.11e contention-based prioritization mechanisms and their coexistence with legacy 802.11 stations , 2005, IEEE Network.

[10]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Understanding link-layer behavior in highly congested IEEE 802.11b wireless networks , 2005, E-WIND '05.

[11]  Josep Paradells Aspas,et al.  Effect of adjacent-channel interference in IEEE 802.11 WLANs , 2007, 2007 2nd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications.

[12]  William A. Arbaugh,et al.  Partially overlapped channels not considered harmful , 2006, SIGMETRICS '06/Performance '06.

[13]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  IEEE 802.11e - fair resource sharing between overlapping basic service sets , 2002, The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[14]  Michael Devetsikiotis,et al.  A Comparison Performance Analysis of QoS WLANs: Approaches with Enhanced Features , 2007, Adv. Multim..

[15]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  IEEE 802.11 e contention-based channel access (EDCF) performance evaluation , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[16]  F.C. Palacio,et al.  Dynamic TXOP configuration for Qos enhancement in IEEE 802.11e wireless LAN , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Software in Telecommunications and Computer Networks.

[17]  Guido R. Hiertz,et al.  Throughput and Delay Performance of IEEE 802.11e Wireless LAN with Block Acknowledgments , 2005 .

[18]  Ilenia Tinnirello,et al.  Throughput and Delay Analysis of IEEE 802.1le Block ACK with Channel Errors , 2007, 2007 2nd International Conference on Communication Systems Software and Middleware.

[19]  Sunghyun Choi,et al.  The Third IEEE Workshop on Wireless Local Area Networks , 2001 .

[20]  Nikos I. Passas,et al.  Prioritized support of different traffic classes in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[21]  A. Girotra,et al.  Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802 . 11 Distributed Coordination Function , 2005 .

[22]  Marek Natkaniec,et al.  An Analysis of Star Topology IEEE 802.11e Networks in the Presence of Hidden Nodes , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Information Networking.

[23]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE 802.11 Wireless LANs – An Evaluation , 2003, Mob. Networks Appl..

[24]  Henrik Lundgren,et al.  Experimental Characterization of Interference in a 802 . 11 g Wireless Mesh Network , 2005 .

[25]  Kevin C. Almeroth,et al.  Understanding congestion in IEEE 802.11b wireless networks , 2005, IMC '05.

[26]  Anura P. Jayasumana,et al.  Effect of hidden terminals on the performance of IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol , 1998, Proceedings 23rd Annual Conference on Local Computer Networks. LCN'98 (Cat. No.98TB100260).

[27]  Andreas Almquist,et al.  Evaluation of quality of service schemes for IEEE 802.11 wireless LANs , 2001, Proceedings LCN 2001. 26th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks.

[28]  Qiang Gao,et al.  QoS Performances of IEEE 802.11 EDCA and DCF: A Testbed Approach , 2009, 2009 5th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[29]  Deyun Gao,et al.  Admission control in IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs , 2005, IEEE Network.

[30]  Young-Joo Suh,et al.  ATXOP: an adaptive TXOP based on the data rate to guarantee fairness for IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs , 2004, IEEE 60th Vehicular Technology Conference, 2004. VTC2004-Fall. 2004.

[31]  Icksoo Lee,et al.  An adaptive TXOP allocation in IEEE 802.11e WLANs , 2007 .