Habitat suitability models for desert amphibians

Abstract A fundamental step in conserving biodiversity is identification of quality habitat needed to sustain populations of target species. We used coarse scale environmental features (soil water holding capacity, soil texture, slope, elevation, and proximity to drainage channels) to predict habitat suitability for four species of desert amphibians in Big Bend National Park, USA: Scaphiopus couchii, Bufo debilis, Bufo punctatus, and Gastrophryne olivacea. Habitat suitability models were evaluated using data from 7 years of breeding site surveys. Overall our models provide quantitative measures of reliability for where species are likely to occur; however, results varied among species. Suitable habitat for B. punctatus and G. olivacea extended over greater proportions of the study area and encompassed a wider variety of habitats compared to suitable habitat for S. couchii and B. debilis. Our models performed better at predicting where S. couchii and B. debilis were likely to occur compared to B. punctatus and G. olivacea. The variation in the predicted suitable habitat among these species, as well as the agreement between model output and breeding site use, elucidates the fact that developing single species habitat suitability models may be a more appropriate approach than trying to develop multi-species models. Our study provides the first habitat suitability models for desert amphibians and provides important information for conservation biologists and land managers concerned with preserving amphibian diversity in xeric landscapes.

[1]  N. Schumaker,et al.  Assessing the potential impacts of alternative landscape designs on amphibian population dynamics , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[2]  Maliha S. Nash,et al.  HABITAT PATCH OCCUPANCY BY TOADS (BUFO PUNCTATUS) IN A NATURALLY FRAGMENTED DESERT LANDSCAPE , 2003 .

[3]  Pacific Southwest Forest,et al.  Wildlife 2000: Modeling Habitat Relationships of Terrestrial Vertebrates , 1987 .

[4]  V. Shoemaker Physiological ecology of amphibians in arid environments , 1988, Journal of Arid Environments.

[5]  J. Mendelson,et al.  Amphibian population declines in montane southern Mexico: resurveys of historical localities , 2004 .

[6]  J. Sauer,et al.  An Evaluation of Population Index and Estimation Techniques for Tadpoles in Desert Pools , 2002 .

[7]  David B. Lindenmayer,et al.  The Focal‐Species Approach and Landscape Restoration: a Critique , 2002 .

[8]  I. Hanski Colonization of ephemeral habitats , 1987 .

[9]  Henry C. Cowles,et al.  The Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on the Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan [Continued] , 1899, Botanical Gazette.

[10]  G. H. Dayton,et al.  Cannibalistic Behavior in Scaphiopus couchii: More Evidence for Larval Anuran Oophagy , 2002 .

[11]  R. Hardy The Influence of Types of Soil upon the Local Distribution of Some Mammals in Southwestern Utah , 1945 .

[12]  N. Scott,et al.  Terrestrial activity and conservation of adult California red-legged frogs Rana aurora draytonii in coastal forests and grasslands , 2003 .

[13]  G. Halffter,et al.  Species diversity and habitat fragmentation: frogs in a tropical montane landscape in Mexico , 2004 .

[14]  Fred E. Smeins,et al.  Multiple-scale habitat modeling approach for rare plant conservation , 2000 .

[15]  Andrew S. Pullin,et al.  Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public Health , 2001 .

[16]  Wilbur W. Mayhew,et al.  Adaptations of the Amphibian, Scaphiopus couchi, to Desert Conditions , 1965 .

[17]  G. Polis The Ecology of Desert Communities , 2023 .

[18]  J. Kiesecker,et al.  Complexity in conservation: lessons from the global decline of amphibian populations , 2002 .

[19]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Effects of landscape characteristics on amphibian distribution in a forest-dominated landscape , 2005 .

[20]  R. L. Wallace,et al.  DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT OF ASCAPHUS TRUEI IN STREAMS ON MANAGED, YOUNG GROWTH FORESTS IN NORTH COASTAL CALIFORNIA , 1999 .

[21]  N. Burnside,et al.  Habitat suitability modelling for calcareous grassland restoration on the South Downs, United Kingdom. , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[22]  Claire C. Vos,et al.  Comparison of habitat-isolation parameters in relation to fragmented distribution patterns in the tree frog (Hyla arborea) , 1996, Landscape Ecology.

[23]  H. Resit Akçakaya,et al.  A Multispecies Approach to Ecological Valuation and Conservation , 2003 .

[24]  Pierre Joly,et al.  Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability , 2002, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[25]  G. Ficetola,et al.  Amphibians in a human-dominated landscape: the community structure is related to habitat features and isolation , 2004 .

[26]  T. Hetherington,et al.  Core terrestrial habitat for conservation of local populations of salamanders and wood frogs in agricultural landscapes , 2004 .

[27]  W. Heyer,et al.  Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians. , 1995 .

[28]  J. Grinnell The Niche-Relationships of the California Thrasher , 1917 .

[29]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations , 2000 .

[30]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  The effects of habitat fragmentation via forestry plantation establishment on spatial genotypic structure in the small marsupial carnivore, Antechinus agilis , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[31]  D. Green The ecology of extinction: population fluctuation and decline in amphibians , 2003 .

[32]  Donna Hazell Frog ecology in modified Australian landscapes: a review , 2003 .

[33]  G. W. Tanner,et al.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ECOLOGY OF EASTERN SPADEFOOT TOADS ON A FLORIDA LANDSCAPE , 2005 .

[34]  E. Fleishman,et al.  Modeling and Predicting Species Occurrence Using Broad‐Scale Environmental Variables: an Example with Butterflies of the Great Basin , 2001 .

[35]  R. Itami,et al.  GIS-based habitat modeling using logistic multiple regression : a study of the Mt. Graham red squirrel , 1991 .

[36]  B. Crother,et al.  Elevational Patterns of Species Richness, Evenness, and Abundance of the Costa Rican Leaf-Litter Herpetofauna , 1989 .

[37]  B. Manly,et al.  Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. , 1994 .

[38]  L. Tevis Unsuccessful Breeding by Desert Toads (Bufo Punctatus) at the Limit of Their Ecological Tolerance , 1966 .

[39]  D. Marsh,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and Amphibian Conservation , 2001 .

[40]  Henry Chandler Cowles,et al.  The Ecological Relations of the Vegetation on the Sand Dunes of Lake Michigan [Continued] , 1899, Botanical Gazette.

[41]  R. Ruibal,et al.  Frogs and toads in deserts. , 1994, Scientific American.

[42]  Loren M. Smith,et al.  Effects of Agricultural Cultivation on Demographics of Southern High Plains Amphibians , 2004 .

[43]  H. Akçakaya,et al.  A Habitat‐Based Metapopulation Model of the California Gnatcatcher , 1997 .

[44]  B. Sullivan Desert environments and the structure of anuran mating systems , 1989 .

[45]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[46]  L. McClanahan Adaptations of the spadefoot toad Scaphiopus couchi, to desert environments , 1967 .

[47]  Lesley Gibson,et al.  Modelling habitat suitability of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus) in the coastal heathlands of southern Victoria, Australia , 2004 .

[48]  R. Newman,et al.  Developmental Plasticity of Scaphiopus Couchii Tadpoles in an Unpredictable Environment , 1989 .

[49]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  Colonization, Succession, and Stability , 1988 .

[50]  B. Sullivan,et al.  Breeding activity, estimated age-structure, and growth in Sonoran Desert anurans , 1999 .

[51]  B. Sullivan,et al.  Arizona distribution of three Sonoran Desert anurans: Bufo retiformis, Gastrophryne olivacea, and Pternohyla fodiens , 1996 .

[52]  Clyde W. Neu,et al.  A TECHNIQUE FOR ANALYSIS OF UTILIZATION- AVAILABILITY DATA' , 1974 .

[53]  R. Newman Effects of density and predation on Scaphiopus couchi tadpoles in desert ponds , 2004, Oecologia.

[54]  A. Pullin,et al.  Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? , 2004 .

[55]  A. N. Bragg The Spadefoot Toads in Oklahoma with a Summary of Our Knowledge of the Group , 1944, The American Naturalist.

[56]  Barry W. Brook,et al.  Catastrophic extinctions follow deforestation in Singapore , 2003, Nature.

[57]  R. L. Wallace,et al.  Distribution and Habitat of Rhyacotriton variegatus in Managed, Young Growth Forests in North Coastal California , 1996 .

[58]  F. Turner Some Features of the Ecology of Bufo Punctatus in Death Valley, California , 1959 .

[59]  E. Fegraus,et al.  Effects of breeding pond isolation on the spatial and temporal dynamics of pond use by the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus , 1999 .

[60]  Loren M. Smith,et al.  Influence of agricultural landscape structure on a Southern High Plains, USA, amphibian assemblage , 2004, Landscape Ecology.