Picture naming in the context of semantically related distractors: A Bayesian meta-analysis 40 years after Lupker 1979s first reaction time study

When participants in an experiment have to name pictures while ignoring distractor words superimposed on the picture or presented auditorily (i.e., picture-word interference paradigm), they take more time when the word to be named (or target) and distractor words are from the same semantic category (e.g., cat-dog). This experimental effect is known as the semantic interference effect, and is probably one of the most studied in the language production literature. The functional origin of the effect and the exact conditions in which it occurs are however still debated. Since Lupker reported the effect in the first response time experiment about 40 years ago, more than 300 similar experiments have been conducted. The semantic interference effect was replicated in many experiments, but several studies also reported the absence of an effect in a subset of experimental conditions. The aim of the present study is to provide a comprehensive theoretical review of the existing evidence to date and several Bayesian meta-analyses and meta-regressions to determine the size of the effect and explore the experimental conditions in which the effect surfaces. The results are discussed in the light of current debates about the functional origin of the semantic interference effect and its implications for our understanding of the language production system.

[1]  Albert Costa,et al.  Set size and repetition in the picture–word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming , 2001, Cognition.

[2]  D. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .

[3]  F. Alario,et al.  On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production , 2006 .

[4]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial , 2018, Journal of cognition.

[5]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review , 2009 .

[6]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[7]  Markus F. Damian,et al.  Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2015, Brain and Language.

[8]  Y. Chen,et al.  The time-course of single-word reading: Evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses , 2012, NeuroImage.

[9]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[11]  W. Heij,et al.  Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Brain Activity Characterise Lexical Activation and Competition in Spoken Word Production , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[14]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming , 2012, Brain Research.

[15]  Matthew A Goldrick,et al.  Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence , 2006 .

[16]  W. Heij,et al.  Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .

[17]  E. Navarrete,et al.  About the locus of the distractor frequency effect: Evidence from the production of clitic pronouns , 2013 .

[18]  R. Job,et al.  The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese Word and Character Frequencies Based on Film Subtitles , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles , 2011 .

[21]  Fangfang Li,et al.  Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction , 2018, J. Phonetics.

[22]  W. Glaser,et al.  Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  M. Garrett,et al.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  Melanie Vitkovitch,et al.  The Effects of Distractor Words on Naming Pictures at the Subordinate Level , 1999 .

[26]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  J. Segui,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in Picture Naming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  A. Postma,et al.  To what extent do we process the nondominant object in a morphed figure? Evidence from a picture–word interference task , 2013 .

[29]  Marina Schmid,et al.  Imagery And Verbal Processes , 2016 .

[30]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[31]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance , 2012, Memory & cognition.

[32]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Assessing the Usefulness of Google Books’ Word Frequencies for Psycholinguistic Research on Word Processing , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[33]  Richard R. Rosinski,et al.  Picture-word interference is semantically based. , 1977 .

[34]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  Time course analysis of the effects of distractor frequency and categorical relatedness in picture naming: An evaluation of the response exclusion account , 2013 .

[35]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Selective and nonselective inhibition of competitors in picture naming , 2013, Memory & cognition.

[37]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions , 2011 .

[38]  Vitória Piai,et al.  Lesions to Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Impair Lexical Interference Control in Word Production , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[39]  Timo B. Roettger,et al.  Using meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: The case of incomplete neutralization in German , 2018, J. Phonetics.

[40]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[41]  Hanna S. Gauvin,et al.  No lexical competition without priming: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm , 2018 .

[42]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Semantic processing during language production: an update of the swinging lexical network , 2019, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.

[43]  Albert Costa,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? , 2000, Cognition.

[44]  J. Barton,et al.  The word-length effect in reading: A review , 2014, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[45]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .

[47]  Patricia J Brooks,et al.  Do Part–Whole Relations Produce Facilitation in the Picture–Word Interference Task? , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[48]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  Statistical Methods for Linguistic Research: Foundational Ideas - Part I , 2016, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[49]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Orthographic and phonological effects in the picture–word interference paradigm: Evidence from a logographic language , 2009, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[50]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Picture-word interference increases with target-set size , 1995 .

[51]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  A. Roelofs Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  A. Meyer Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[54]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[55]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.

[56]  Elizabeth Gilbert,et al.  Reproducibility Project: Results (Part of symposium called "The Reproducibility Project: Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science") , 2014 .

[57]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis , 2005, Cognition.

[58]  H Schriefers,et al.  Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: the gender interference effect in German. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[59]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[60]  S. Lupker The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.

[61]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Electrophysiological Chronometry of Semantic Context Effects in Language Production , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  Neural evidence for phonologically based language production deficits in older adults: An fMRI investigation of age‐related differences in picture‐word interference , 2017, Brain and behavior.

[63]  Danielle R Kleinman Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[64]  W. Heij,et al.  Reading versus naming: The effect of target set size on contextual interference and facilitation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[65]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[66]  Katie L McMahon,et al.  Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[67]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Distributional analysis of semantic interference in picture naming , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[68]  Peter Indefrey,et al.  The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[69]  James Hutson,et al.  Semantic gradients in picture-word interference tasks: is the size of interference effects affected by the degree of semantic overlap? , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[70]  G S Dell,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.

[71]  Sabrina Aristei,et al.  The Closer They Are, the More They Interfere: Semantic Similarity of Word Distractors Increases Competition in Language Production , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[72]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[73]  M. Laganaro,et al.  When Wine and Apple Both Help the Production of Grapes: ERP Evidence for Post-lexical Semantic Facilitation in Picture Naming , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[74]  Gerrit Hirschfeld,et al.  Interference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with event-related potentials , 2008, Neuroreport.

[75]  G. S. Klein,et al.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[76]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[77]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Semantic interference in picture naming during dual-task performance does not vary with reading ability , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[78]  Albert Costa,et al.  On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[79]  M. Damian,et al.  Processing different kinds of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[80]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Now you see it … and now again: Semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[81]  K. Forster,et al.  The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming , 2004 .

[82]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[83]  V. Ferreira,et al.  Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[84]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[85]  K Rayner,et al.  Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[86]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Now You See it, Now you Don't: On Turning Semantic Interference Into Facilitation in a Stroop-Like Task , 2006, Cortex.

[87]  M. Kronbichler,et al.  Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[88]  Frank Oppermann,et al.  Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[89]  Wido La Heij,et al.  Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .

[90]  R. Knight,et al.  Lexical selection with competing distractors: Evidence from left temporal lobe lesions , 2016, bioRxiv.

[91]  Qingfang Zhang,et al.  Transforming semantic interference into facilitation in a picture–word interference task , 2015, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[92]  J. Carlin,et al.  Beyond Power Calculations , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[93]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Semantic interference in language production is due to graded similarity, not response relevance , 2013, CogSci.

[94]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[95]  Albert Costa,et al.  Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish–English and English–Spanish bilinguals , 1999, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[96]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[97]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic picture–word interference is a postperceptual effect , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[98]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[99]  A. Caramazza How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .

[100]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Set size and repetition matter: comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000) , 2001, Cognition.

[101]  Simona Collina,et al.  Word Production and the Picture-Word Interference Paradigm: The Role of Learning , 2013, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[102]  C. Thompson,et al.  The use of the picture–word interference paradigm to examine naming abilities in aphasic individuals , 2010, Aphasiology.

[103]  M. T. Medaglia,et al.  Early and Late Effects of Semantic Distractors on Electroencephalographic Responses During Overt Picture Naming , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[104]  Francesca Peressotti,et al.  Distributional analyses in the picture–word interference paradigm: Exploring the semantic interference and the distractor frequency effects , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[105]  Cornelius Weiller,et al.  The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm , 2009, NeuroImage.

[106]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[107]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[108]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[109]  A. Caramazza,et al.  When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[110]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Working memory capacity and dual-task interference in picture naming. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[111]  Robert Davies,et al.  Semantic domain and grammatical class effects in the picture–word interference paradigm , 2014 .

[112]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[113]  Louise Hunt,et al.  Abuse of power. , 2020, Nursing times.

[114]  Albert Costa,et al.  A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency , 2006 .

[115]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs , 1993, Cognition.

[116]  D. Vinson,et al.  Can the humped animal's knee conceal its name? Commentary on: “The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access” , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[117]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming , 2012, Cognition.

[118]  M. Laganaro,et al.  Tracking the time course of multi-word noun phrase production with ERPs or on when (and why) cat is faster than the big cat , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[119]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .