Picture naming in the context of semantically related distractors: A Bayesian meta-analysis 40 years after Lupker 1979s first reaction time study
暂无分享,去创建一个
S. Elbuy | S. Madec | S. Vasishth | A. Bürki | S. Vasishth | A. Bürki | S. Madec | S. Elbuy
[1] Albert Costa,et al. Set size and repetition in the picture–word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming , 2001, Cognition.
[2] D. Bates,et al. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS , 2001 .
[3] F. Alario,et al. On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production , 2006 .
[4] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial , 2018, Journal of cognition.
[5] Alissa Melinger,et al. Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review , 2009 .
[6] Antje S. Meyer,et al. Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .
[7] Markus F. Damian,et al. Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials , 2015, Brain and Language.
[8] Y. Chen,et al. The time-course of single-word reading: Evidence from fast behavioral and brain responses , 2012, NeuroImage.
[9] Mark S. Seidenberg,et al. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[10] Herbert Schriefers,et al. Semantic competition between hierarchically related words during speech planning , 2005, Memory & cognition.
[11] W. Heij,et al. Components of Stroop-like interference in picture naming , 1988, Memory & cognition.
[12] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Distinct Patterns of Brain Activity Characterise Lexical Activation and Competition in Spoken Word Production , 2014, PloS one.
[13] A. Jacobs,et al. The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. , 2011, Experimental psychology.
[14] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Event-related potentials and oscillatory brain responses associated with semantic and Stroop-like interference effects in overt naming , 2012, Brain Research.
[15] Matthew A Goldrick,et al. Limited interaction in speech production: Chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence , 2006 .
[16] W. Heij,et al. Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .
[17] E. Navarrete,et al. About the locus of the distractor frequency effect: Evidence from the production of clitic pronouns , 2013 .
[18] R. Job,et al. The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[19] M. Brysbaert,et al. SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese Word and Character Frequencies Based on Film Subtitles , 2010, PloS one.
[20] Marc Brysbaert,et al. SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles , 2011 .
[21] Fangfang Li,et al. Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction , 2018, J. Phonetics.
[22] W. Glaser,et al. Context effects in stroop-like word and picture processing. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[23] M. Garrett,et al. Representing the meanings of object and action words: The featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.
[24] Randi C. Martin,et al. Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[25] Melanie Vitkovitch,et al. The Effects of Distractor Words on Naming Pictures at the Subordinate Level , 1999 .
[26] Willem J. M. Levelt,et al. A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[27] J. Segui,et al. Semantic and Associative Priming in Picture Naming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[28] A. Postma,et al. To what extent do we process the nondominant object in a morphed figure? Evidence from a picture–word interference task , 2013 .
[29] Marina Schmid,et al. Imagery And Verbal Processes , 2016 .
[30] Stephen J. Lupker,et al. The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .
[31] Herbert Schriefers,et al. Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance , 2012, Memory & cognition.
[32] M. Brysbaert,et al. Assessing the Usefulness of Google Books’ Word Frequencies for Psycholinguistic Research on Word Processing , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[33] Richard R. Rosinski,et al. Picture-word interference is semantically based. , 1977 .
[34] Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al. Time course analysis of the effects of distractor frequency and categorical relatedness in picture naming: An evaluation of the response exclusion account , 2013 .
[35] Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al. The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[36] A. Roelofs,et al. Selective and nonselective inhibition of competitors in picture naming , 2013, Memory & cognition.
[37] Herbert Schriefers,et al. Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions , 2011 .
[38] Vitória Piai,et al. Lesions to Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Impair Lexical Interference Control in Word Production , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[39] Timo B. Roettger,et al. Using meta-analysis for evidence synthesis: The case of incomplete neutralization in German , 2018, J. Phonetics.
[40] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[41] Hanna S. Gauvin,et al. No lexical competition without priming: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm , 2018 .
[42] Alissa Melinger,et al. Semantic processing during language production: an update of the swinging lexical network , 2019, Language, Cognition and Neuroscience.
[43] Albert Costa,et al. The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? , 2000, Cognition.
[44] J. Barton,et al. The word-length effect in reading: A review , 2014, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[45] R. Hartsuiker,et al. The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[46] Wido La Heij,et al. Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. , 1995 .
[47] Patricia J Brooks,et al. Do Part–Whole Relations Produce Facilitation in the Picture–Word Interference Task? , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[48] Shravan Vasishth,et al. Statistical Methods for Linguistic Research: Foundational Ideas - Part I , 2016, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[49] A. Caramazza,et al. Orthographic and phonological effects in the picture–word interference paradigm: Evidence from a logographic language , 2009, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[50] Wido La Heij,et al. Picture-word interference increases with target-set size , 1995 .
[51] W. Glaser,et al. The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[52] A. Roelofs. Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[53] A. Meyer. Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .
[54] M. Brysbaert,et al. The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[55] A. Roelofs,et al. Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.
[56] Elizabeth Gilbert,et al. Reproducibility Project: Results (Part of symposium called "The Reproducibility Project: Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science") , 2014 .
[57] Marc Brysbaert,et al. Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis , 2005, Cognition.
[58] H Schriefers,et al. Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: the gender interference effect in German. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[59] Katie L. McMahon,et al. Auditory context effects in picture naming investigated with event-related fMRI , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[60] S. Lupker. The role of phonetic and orthographic similarity in picture-word interference. , 1982, Canadian journal of psychology.
[61] Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al. Electrophysiological Chronometry of Semantic Context Effects in Language Production , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[62] Michele T. Diaz,et al. Neural evidence for phonologically based language production deficits in older adults: An fMRI investigation of age‐related differences in picture‐word interference , 2017, Brain and behavior.
[63] Danielle R Kleinman. Resolving semantic interference during word production requires central attention. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[64] W. Heij,et al. Reading versus naming: The effect of target set size on contextual interference and facilitation , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[65] J. Ridley. Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .
[66] Katie L McMahon,et al. Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[67] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Distributional analysis of semantic interference in picture naming , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[68] Peter Indefrey,et al. The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update , 2011, Front. Psychology.
[69] James Hutson,et al. Semantic gradients in picture-word interference tasks: is the size of interference effects affected by the degree of semantic overlap? , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[70] G S Dell,et al. A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. , 1986, Psychological review.
[71] Sabrina Aristei,et al. The Closer They Are, the More They Interfere: Semantic Similarity of Word Distractors Increases Competition in Language Production , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[72] Randi C. Martin,et al. Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[73] M. Laganaro,et al. When Wine and Apple Both Help the Production of Grapes: ERP Evidence for Post-lexical Semantic Facilitation in Picture Naming , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[74] Gerrit Hirschfeld,et al. Interference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with event-related potentials , 2008, Neuroreport.
[75] G. S. Klein,et al. SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.
[76] Michele T. Diaz,et al. Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[77] A. Roelofs,et al. Semantic interference in picture naming during dual-task performance does not vary with reading ability , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[78] Albert Costa,et al. On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[79] M. Damian,et al. Processing different kinds of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[80] Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al. Now you see it … and now again: Semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[81] K. Forster,et al. The role of polysemy in masked semantic and translation priming , 2004 .
[82] Allan Collins,et al. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .
[83] V. Ferreira,et al. Semantic and phonological information flow in the production lexicon. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[84] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[85] K Rayner,et al. Graphemic and semantic similarity effects in the picture-word interference task. , 1986, British journal of psychology.
[86] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Now You See it, Now you Don't: On Turning Semantic Interference Into Facilitation in a Stroop-Like Task , 2006, Cortex.
[87] M. Kronbichler,et al. Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading , 2016, Cerebral cortex.
[88] Frank Oppermann,et al. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[89] Wido La Heij,et al. Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in word translation: Implications for models of lexical access in language production , 2003 .
[90] R. Knight,et al. Lexical selection with competing distractors: Evidence from left temporal lobe lesions , 2016, bioRxiv.
[91] Qingfang Zhang,et al. Transforming semantic interference into facilitation in a picture–word interference task , 2015, Applied Psycholinguistics.
[92] J. Carlin,et al. Beyond Power Calculations , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[93] Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al. Semantic interference in language production is due to graded similarity, not response relevance , 2013, CogSci.
[94] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[95] Albert Costa,et al. Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish–English and English–Spanish bilinguals , 1999, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.
[96] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task , 2010, Memory & cognition.
[97] Randi C. Martin,et al. Semantic picture–word interference is a postperceptual effect , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[98] Markus F Damian,et al. Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[99] A. Caramazza. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access , 1997 .
[100] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Set size and repetition matter: comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000) , 2001, Cognition.
[101] Simona Collina,et al. Word Production and the Picture-Word Interference Paradigm: The Role of Learning , 2013, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[102] C. Thompson,et al. The use of the picture–word interference paradigm to examine naming abilities in aphasic individuals , 2010, Aphasiology.
[103] M. T. Medaglia,et al. Early and Late Effects of Semantic Distractors on Electroencephalographic Responses During Overt Picture Naming , 2019, Front. Psychol..
[104] Francesca Peressotti,et al. Distributional analyses in the picture–word interference paradigm: Exploring the semantic interference and the distractor frequency effects , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[105] Cornelius Weiller,et al. The separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm , 2009, NeuroImage.
[106] Alissa Melinger,et al. When bees hamper the production of honey: lexical interference from associates in speech production. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[107] A. Roelofs,et al. A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.
[108] D. A. Kenny,et al. Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: a new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[109] A. Caramazza,et al. When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[110] A. Roelofs,et al. Working memory capacity and dual-task interference in picture naming. , 2013, Acta psychologica.
[111] Robert Davies,et al. Semantic domain and grammatical class effects in the picture–word interference paradigm , 2014 .
[112] Bradford Z. Mahon,et al. Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[113] Louise Hunt,et al. Abuse of power. , 2020, Nursing times.
[114] Albert Costa,et al. A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency , 2006 .
[115] Ardi Roelofs,et al. Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs , 1993, Cognition.
[116] D. Vinson,et al. Can the humped animal's knee conceal its name? Commentary on: “The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access” , 2015, Front. Psychol..
[117] Jonathan Grainger,et al. A funny thing happened on the way to articulation: N400 attenuation despite behavioral interference in picture naming , 2012, Cognition.
[118] M. Laganaro,et al. Tracking the time course of multi-word noun phrase production with ERPs or on when (and why) cat is faster than the big cat , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[119] P. Starreveld,et al. Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .