Computationally efficient modelling of dynamic soil–structure interaction of offshore wind turbines on gravity footings

The formulation and quality of a computationally efficient model of offshore wind turbine surface foundations are examined. The aim is to establish a model, workable in the frequency and time domain, that can be applied in aeroelastic codes for fast and reliable evaluation of the dynamic structural response of wind turbines, in which the geometrical dissipation related to wave propagation into the subsoil is included. Based on the optimal order of a consistent lumped-parameter model obtained by the domain-transformation method and a weighted least-squares technique, the dynamic vibration response of a 5.0 MW offshore wind turbine is evaluated for different stratifications, environmental conditions and foundation geometries by the aeroelastic nonlinear multi-body code HAWC2. Analyses show that a consistent lumped-parameter model with three to five internal degrees of freedom per displacement or rotation of the foundation is necessary in order to obtain an accurate prediction of the foundation response in the frequency and time domain. In addition, the required static bearing capacity of surface foundations leads to fore–aft vibrations during normal operation of a wind turbine that are insensitive to wave propagating in the subsoil—even for soil stratifications with low cut-in frequencies. In this regard, utilising discrete second-order models for the physical interpretation of a rational filter puts special demands on the Newmark β-scheme, where the time integration in most cases only provides a causal response for constant acceleration within each time step.

[1]  W. Thomson,et al.  Transmission of Elastic Waves through a Stratified Solid Medium , 1950 .

[2]  N. A. Haskell The Dispersion of Surface Waves on Multilayered Media , 1953 .

[3]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Impedance of Surface Footings on Layered Ground , 2005 .

[4]  J. E. Luco,et al.  Tables of impedance functions for square foundations on layered media , 1985 .

[5]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[6]  M. Matsuichi,et al.  Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress , 1968 .

[7]  Robert L. Higdon,et al.  Absorbing boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic waves in stratified media , 1992 .

[8]  S Ahmad,et al.  Horizontal impedance of square foundation in layered soil , 1999 .

[9]  Y. Yong,et al.  Motion of foundation on a layered soil medium — I. Impedance characteristics , 1997 .

[10]  Akira Mita,et al.  IMPEDANCE FUNCTIONS AND INPUT MOTIONS FOR EMBEDDED SQUARE FOUNDATIONS , 1989 .

[11]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Impedance of flexible suction caissons , 2007 .

[12]  Suhol Bu,et al.  COUPLED HORIZONTAL-ROCKING IMPEDANCE FUNCTIONS FOR EMBEDDED SQUARE FOUNDATIONS AT HIGH FREQUENCY FACTORS , 1999 .

[13]  Milos Novak,et al.  Non‐Linear Model for Dynamic Axial Pile Response , 1994 .

[14]  K. Schittkowski NLPQL: A fortran subroutine solving constrained nonlinear programming problems , 1986 .

[15]  J. Jonkman,et al.  Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development , 2009 .

[16]  D. Rixen,et al.  General Framework for Dynamic Substructuring: History, Review and Classification of Techniques , 2008 .

[17]  John P. Wolf,et al.  Foundation Vibration Analysis Using Simple Physical Models , 1994 .

[18]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Cross-wind modal properties of offshore wind turbines identified by full scale testing , 2013 .

[19]  D. P. Hurdle,et al.  Revision of SPM 1984 wave hindcast model to avoid inconsistencies in engineering applications , 1989 .

[20]  José Domínguez,et al.  Dynamic response of axisymmetric embedded foundations , 1989 .

[21]  Milos Novak,et al.  Nonlinear lateral interaction in pile dynamics , 1995 .

[22]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Assessment of lumped-parameter models for rigid footings , 2010 .

[23]  Luis Eduardo Pérez-Rocha,et al.  A simplified procedure for torsional impedance functions of embedded foundations in a soil layer , 1996 .

[24]  Chris Jones,et al.  Ground vibration generated by a harmonic load acting on a railway track , 1999 .

[25]  Milos Novak,et al.  Nonlinear Axial Interaction in Pile Dynamics , 1994 .

[26]  Mehrdad Kimiaei,et al.  Cyclic lateral response of pile foundations in offshore platforms , 2012 .

[27]  Anestis S. Veletsos,et al.  Torsional Vibration of Viscoelastic Foundations , 1974 .

[28]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen Wave propagation in infinite structures and media , 2002 .

[29]  Lars Andersen,et al.  Efficient Modelling of Wind Turbine Foundations , 2011 .

[30]  M. E. Naggar,et al.  Dynamic analysis for laterally loaded piles and dynamic p-y curves , 2000 .

[31]  S. Krenk Unified formulation of radiation conditions for the wave equation , 2002 .

[32]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Lumped-Parameter Models for Wind-Turbine Footings on Layered Ground , 2007 .

[33]  Milos Novak,et al.  Nonlinear analysis for dynamic lateral pile response , 1996 .

[34]  Lars Vabbersgaard Andersen,et al.  Impedance of Bucket Foundations: Torsional, Horizontal and Rocking Motion , 2008 .

[35]  Nii Allotey,et al.  Generalized dynamic Winkler model for nonlinear soil–structure interaction analysis , 2008 .

[36]  Steen Krenk Mechanics and Analysis of Beams, Columns and Cables: A Modern Introduction to the Classic Theories , 2001 .

[37]  Milos Novak,et al.  Torsional and coupled vibrations of embedded footings , 1973 .

[38]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1997 .

[39]  Anestis S. Veletsos,et al.  LATERAL AND ROCKING VIBRATION OF FOOTINGS , 1971 .

[40]  J. E. Luco,et al.  Dynamic Response of Circular Footings , 1971 .

[41]  S. Kramer Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 1996 .

[42]  Robert L. Higdon,et al.  Radiation boundary conditions for elastic wave propagation , 1990 .

[43]  John Dalsgaard Sørensen,et al.  Natural Frequencies of Wind Turbines on Monopile Foundations in Clayey Soils: A probabilistic approach , 2012 .