Effects of inflow turbulence on a cavity-stabilised supersonic premixed hydrogen flame: A direct numerical simulation study

In this work, supersonic premixed H2/air combustion stabilised by a cavity flame-holder in a model scramjet combustor with a Mach 1.5 inflow is studied via direct numerical simulations. By applying turbulent and laminar inlet condition separately, we compare the flame stabilisation characteristics between these two cases to study the effect of inflow turbulence. The ignition and flame propagation process are similar in both cases.After combustion in the area near the cavity reaches quasi-stationary state, the results show that with inflow turbulence more robust vortices are developed in cavity shear layer and near the aft wall, resulting in a thicker reaction zone and larger flame surface which present more efficient combustion. In addition, the inlet turbulence enhances the entry of fresh mixture and this further supports flame stabilisation near the cavity. However, the fully developed cavity shear layer also leads to greater cavity resistance. As for the flame stabilization, with inlet turbulence more robust recirculation and stronger mass exchange process is observed and promote the radical transport. These results give a preliminary insight into the flame stabilization mechanism. The distribution of progress variable indicates that the flame stabilized toward products side with turbulent inlet.

[1]  Zhi X. Chen,et al.  Direct numerical simulations of the Taylor–Green vortex interacting with a hydrogen diffusion flame: Reynolds number and non-unity-Lewis number effects , 2023, Physics of Fluids.

[2]  Zhi X. Chen,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of supersonic internal flow in a model scramjet combustor under a non-reactive condition , 2023, Physics of Fluids.

[3]  Tonghun Lee,et al.  Review of combustion stabilization for hypersonic airbreathing propulsion , 2020 .

[4]  E. Benini,et al.  A sharp-interface immersed boundary method for moving objects in compressible viscous flows , 2020 .

[5]  Jiajian Zhu,et al.  Unsteady Supersonic Combustion , 2020 .

[6]  D. Peterson High-Resolution Simulations of Premixed Combustion in a Supersonic Cavity , 2019, AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum.

[7]  Jacqueline H. Chen,et al.  DNS of a turbulent premixed flame stabilized over a backward facing step , 2019 .

[8]  Luca M. L. Cantu,et al.  Coherent anti-Stokes Raman spectroscopy of a premixed ethylene–air flame in a dual-mode scramjet , 2018 .

[9]  Harsha K. Chelliah,et al.  DNS Investigation of Cavity Stabilized Premixed Turbulent Ethylene-Air Flame , 2018 .

[10]  Javier Urzay,et al.  Supersonic Combustion in Air-Breathing Propulsion Systems for Hypersonic Flight , 2018 .

[11]  G. Lehnasch,et al.  Compressibility and heat release effects in high-speed reactive mixing layers I.: Growth rates and turbulence characteristics , 2017 .

[12]  Lipeng Lu,et al.  Investigation of the Three-Dimensional Shock- Wave/Turbulent-Boundary-Layer Interaction Initiated by a Single-Fin , 2016 .

[13]  C. Carter,et al.  Influences of Freestream Turbulence on Flame Dynamics in a Supersonic Combustor , 2017 .

[14]  Yufeng Yao,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent flows around a tandem expansion-compression corner , 2015 .

[15]  Corin Segal,et al.  Cavity-based flameholding for chemically-reacting supersonic flows , 2015 .

[16]  Lipeng Lu,et al.  Investigation of low-dissipation monotonicity-preserving scheme for direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulent flows , 2014 .

[17]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  Experimental and numerical investigation of cavity-based supersonic flow and combustion , 2014 .

[18]  P. Moin,et al.  Subgrid-scale backscatter in reacting and inert supersonic hydrogen–air turbulent mixing layers , 2014, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[19]  Ning Qin,et al.  Large eddy simulation based studies of jet–cavity interactions in a supersonic flow , 2014 .

[20]  Haiyan Wu,et al.  Combustion modes of hydrogen jet combustion in a cavity-based supersonic combustor , 2013 .

[21]  Zhaorui Li,et al.  An Optimized Low-Dissipation Monotonicity-Preserving Scheme for Numerical Simulations of High-Speed Turbulent Flows , 2013, Journal of Scientific Computing.

[22]  Ning Qin,et al.  Combustion characteristics in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flameholder , 2013 .

[23]  X. Bai,et al.  Flame stabilization in a supersonic combustor with hydrogen injection upstream of cavity flame holders: experiments and simulations , 2011 .

[24]  Srikant Srinivasan,et al.  Large Eddy Simulation of Supersonic Combustion in a Cavity-Strut Flameholder , 2011 .

[25]  Forman A. Williams,et al.  An explicit reduced mechanism for H2–air combustion , 2011 .

[26]  Jian Li,et al.  IGNITION TRANSIENT IN AN ETHYLENE FUELED SCRAMJET ENGINE WITH AIR THROTTLING , 2010 .

[27]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Study on Flame Stabilization in a Supersonic Combustor with Hydrogen Injection Upstream of Cavity Flameholders , 2009 .

[28]  Scott Klasky,et al.  Terascale direct numerical simulations of turbulent combustion using S3D , 2008 .

[29]  R. Friedrich,et al.  On the turbulence structure in inert and reacting compressible mixing layers , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  Tianfeng Lu,et al.  Simulations of cavity-stabilized flames in supersonic flows using reduced chemical kinetic mechanisms , 2006 .

[31]  Xudong Xiao,et al.  Turbulence Modeling for Scramjet Applications , 2005 .

[32]  Campbell D. Carter,et al.  Mixing and combustion studies using cavity-based flameholders in a supersonic flow , 2004 .

[33]  S. Baek,et al.  Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection , 2004 .

[34]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Cavity Flame-Holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: An Overview , 2001 .

[35]  Chung-Jen Tam,et al.  Analysis of unsteady cavity flows for scramjet applications , 2000 .

[36]  K. Hsu,et al.  Fundamental Studies of Cavity-Based Flameholder Concepts for Supersonic Combustors , 1999 .

[37]  Corin Segal,et al.  Flame-Holding Configurations for Kerosene Combustion in a Mach 1.8 Airflow , 1998 .

[38]  R. Bowersox,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics analysis of cavity flame holders for scramjets , 1997 .