Usability inspection methods: report on a workshop held at CHI'92, Monterey, CA, May 3–4, 1992

Usability inspection methods, based on informed intuition s about interface design quality, hold promise of providing faster, more cost-effective ways to generate usability evaluations, compared to empirical user evaluation methods . Examples of inspection methods include heuristic evaluation (Nielsen & Molich, 1990), usability walkthroughs (Bias, 1991 ; Karat & Bennett, 1991a, 1991b), cognitive walk -throughs (Lewis, Polson, Wharton & Reiman, 1990), and applications of guidelines in walkthroughs (Jeffries, Miller, Wharton, & Uyeda, 1991). These methods have been used in development for some time in one form or another (perhap s by other names), often because there is simply no alternative like user testing. Usability inspection methods have been an object of research in the last two years or so . Progress has been made in refining methods, and understanding their role i n usability engineering.

[1]  Heather Desurvire,et al.  EMPIRICISM VERSUS JUDGEMENT: COMPARING USER INTERFACE EVALUATION METHODS ON A NEW TELEPHONE-BASED INTERFACE , 1991, SGCH.

[2]  David E. Rowley,et al.  The cognitive jogthrough: a fast-paced user interface evaluation procedure , 1992, CHI.

[3]  Clare-Marie Karat,et al.  Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation , 1992, CHI.

[4]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  Applying cognitive walkthroughs to more complex user interfaces: experiences, issues, and recommendations , 1992, CHI.

[5]  Michael E. Atwood,et al.  What is gained and lost when using evaluation methods other than empirical testing , 1993 .

[6]  R. Bias,et al.  Interface-Walkthroughs: efficient collaborative testing , 1991, IEEE Software.

[7]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  A Cost-Effective Evaluation Method for Use by Designers , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[8]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[9]  Robin Jeffries,et al.  User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques , 1991, CHI.

[10]  John Karat,et al.  Working within the design process: supporting effective and efficient design , 1991 .

[11]  Thomas P. Moran,et al.  Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  Richard M. Young,et al.  Options and Criteria: Elements of design space analysis , 1991 .

[13]  Cathleen Wharton,et al.  Cognitive Walkthroughs: A Method for Theory-Based Evaluation of User Interfaces , 1992, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[14]  John Karat Taking software design seriously : practical techniques for human-computer interaction design , 1991 .

[15]  John Karat,et al.  Using scenarios in design meetings—a case study example , 1991 .

[16]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation , 1992, CHI.

[17]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Questions and information systems , 1992 .

[18]  Brigham Bell Using programming walkthroughs to design a visual language , 1992 .

[19]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.