Analysis of tracer tomography using temporal moments of tracer breakthrough curves

Hydraulic/partitioning tracer tomography (HPTT) was recently developed by Yeh and Zhu [Yeh T-CJ, Zhu J. Hydraulic/partitioning tracer tomography for characterization of dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zones, Water Resour Res 2007;43:W06435. doi:10.1029/2006WR004877.] for estimating spatial distribution of dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) in the subsurface. Since discrete tracer concentration data are directly utilized for the estimation of DNAPLs, this approach solves the hyperbolic convection–dispersion equation. Solution to the convection–dispersion equation however demands fine temporal and spatial discretization, resulting in high computational cost for an HPTT analysis. In this work, we use temporal moments of tracer breakthrough curves instead of discrete concentration data to estimate DNAPL distribution. This approach solves time independent partial differential equations of the temporal moments, and therefore avoids solving the convection–dispersion equation using a time marching scheme, resulting in a dramatic reduction of computational cost. To reduce numerical oscillations associated with convection dominated transport problems such as in inter-well tracer tests, the approach uses a finite element solver adopting the streamline upwind Petrov–Galerkin method to calculate moments and sensitivities. We test the temporal moment approach through numerical simulations. Comparing the computational costs between utilizing moments and discrete concentrations, we find that temporal moments significantly reduce the computation time. We also find that tracer moment data collected through a tomographic survey alone are able to yield reasonable estimates of hydraulic conductivity, as indicated by a correlation of 0.588 between estimated and true hydraulic conductivity fields in the synthetic case study.

[1]  Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al.  Characterization of aquifer heterogeneity using transient hydraulic tomography , 2004 .

[2]  T. Hughes,et al.  Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[3]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Partitioning Tracer Test for Detection, Estimation, and Remediation Performance Assessment of Subsurface Nonaqueous Phase Liquids , 1995 .

[4]  W. Graham,et al.  Partitioning tracer transport in a hydrogeochemically heterogeneous aquifer , 2001 .

[5]  Michael D. Annable,et al.  Estimating nonaqueous phase liquid spatial variability using partitioning tracer higher temporal moments , 2003 .

[6]  Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al.  Hydraulic/partitioning tracer tomography for characterization of dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zones , 2007 .

[7]  Keiji Kojima,et al.  Hydropulse Tomography for Identifying 3-D Permeability Distribution , 1993 .

[8]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Traditional analysis of aquifer tests: Comparing apples to oranges? , 2005 .

[9]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Stochastic continuum representation of fractured rock permeability as an alternative to the REV and fracture network concepts , 1988 .

[10]  Shuyun Liu,et al.  Effectiveness of hydraulic tomography: Sandbox experiments , 2001 .

[11]  W. Graham,et al.  Estimation of spatially variable residual nonaqueous phase liquid saturations in nonuniform flow fields using partitioning tracer data , 2000 .

[12]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Temporal-moment matching for truncated breakthrough curves for step or step-pulse injection , 2006 .

[13]  Anthony L. Endres,et al.  Pumping-induced vadose zone drainage and storage in an unconfined aquifer: A comparison of analytical model predictions and field measurements , 2007 .

[14]  Geoffrey C. Bohling,et al.  A field assessment of the value of steady shape hydraulic tomography for characterization of aquifer heterogeneities , 2007 .

[15]  Wei Li,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Geostatistical Inversion of Flowmeter and Pumping Test Data , 2008, Ground water.

[16]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  Temporal Moment‐Generating Equations: Modeling Transport and Mass Transfer in Heterogeneous Aquifers , 1995 .

[17]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Sequential aquifer tests at a well field, Montalto Uffugo Scalo, Italy , 2007 .

[18]  T.-C. Jim Yeh,et al.  An inverse model for three‐dimensional flow in variably saturated porous media , 2000 .

[19]  N. Sun Inverse problems in groundwater modeling , 1994 .

[20]  Wendy D. Graham,et al.  Optimal estimation of residual non–aqueous phase liquid saturations using partitioning tracer concentration data , 1997 .

[21]  T. Yeh,et al.  Analysis of hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data , 2006 .

[22]  Velimir V. Vesselinov,et al.  Three‐dimensional numerical inversion of pneumatic cross‐hole tests in unsaturated fractured tuff: 1. Methodology and borehole effects , 2001 .

[23]  L. Townley,et al.  Computationally Efficient Algorithms for Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Propagation in Numerical Models of Groundwater Flow , 1985 .

[24]  Hans Petter Langtangen,et al.  Computational Partial Differential Equations - Numerical Methods and Diffpack Programming , 1999, Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering.

[25]  Junfeng Zhu,et al.  Laboratory sandbox validation of transient hydraulic tomography , 2007 .

[26]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Sensitivity of temporal moments calculated by the adjoint-state method and joint inversing of head and tracer data , 2000 .

[27]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  Identification of the permeability distribution in soil by hydraulic tomography , 1995 .

[28]  Walter A Illman,et al.  Practical Issues in Imaging Hydraulic Conductivity through Hydraulic Tomography , 2008, Ground water.

[29]  C. McDermott,et al.  New experimental techniques for pneumatic tomographical determination of the flow and transport parameters of highly fractured porous rock samples , 2003 .

[30]  James J. Butler,et al.  Pumping tests in nonuniform aquifers: The radially asymmetric case , 1993 .

[31]  Cokriging estimation of the conductivity field under variably saturated flow conditions , 1999 .

[32]  Walter A. Illman,et al.  Steady-state hydraulic tomography in a laboratory aquifer with deterministic heterogeneity: Multi-method and multiscale validation of hydraulic conductivity tomograms , 2007 .

[33]  R. W. Andrews,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Steady State Groundwater Flow Using Adjoint Operators , 1985 .

[34]  T. Yeh,et al.  Hydraulic tomography: Development of a new aquifer test method , 2000 .

[35]  W. Li,et al.  Two‐dimensional characterization of hydraulic heterogeneity by multiple pumping tests , 2007 .