Column generation for IMRT cancer therapy optimization with implementable segments

A radiation beam passes through normal tissue to reach tumor. The latest devices for the radiotherapy of cancer provide intensity modulated radiation treatment, or IMRT. This method refines cancer treatment by varying the intensity profile across the face of a radiation beam. Intensity modulation is usually accomplished by partitioning each beam, distinguished by its angle of entry, into an array of smaller sized units, called beamlets, assigned different intensities. Planning treatment calls for an optimization over beamlet intensities to maximize the dose delivered to the targeted tumor while keeping the distribution of dose throughout the various organs within physician prescribed bounds. The choice of beam angles can be entered into the optimization as well.A common method to produce an intensity pattern is to block out different parts of the beam for different amounts of time. This can be done sliding narrow blocks (leafs) of unit width into the beam from either of two opposing sides to create different beam shapes called segments. A sequence of segments with their exposure times is superimposed to yield the dose distribution actually received in the patient. Current two stage treatment is derived in separate steps: optimization over independently considered beamlet intensities, and generation of a sequence of segments to approximate the planned intensity map. The approximation degrades the solution, and the separate search for segments adds to planning time. We present a mixed integer programming alternative employing column generation to optimize dose over segments themselves. Only segments that can be realized with delivery devices are generated, and adjustments made for the effects of block edges, so that the optimized plans are directly implementable. Preliminary testing demonstrates gains in both planning efficiency and quality of the plans produced.

[1]  Ronald L. Rardin,et al.  A coupled column generation, mixed integer approach to optimal planning of intensity modulated radiation therapy for cancer , 2004, Math. Program..

[2]  Yair Censor,et al.  The Least-Intensity Feasible Solution for Aperture-Based Inverse Planning in Radiation Therapy , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  T. Bortfeld,et al.  X-ray field compensation with multileaf collimators. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  A L Boyer,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with dynamic multileaf collimators. , 1999, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[5]  C. Cotrutz,et al.  Segment-based dose optimization using a genetic algorithm. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  W. Que Comparison of algorithms for multileaf collimator field segmentation. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  Yi-min Hu,et al.  Intensity-modulation radiotherapy using independent collimators: an algorithm study. , 1999, Medical physics.

[8]  J F Fowler,et al.  Steepness of dose-response curve for larynx cancer. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  J A Purdy,et al.  Clinical dose-volume histogram analysis for pneumonitis after 3D treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  R. Siochi,et al.  Minimizing static intensity modulation delivery time using an intensity solid paradigm. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  P Okunieff,et al.  Clinical implications of heterogeneity of tumor response to radiation therapy. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  J M Galvin,et al.  Combining multileaf fields to modulate fluence distributions. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  D M Shepard,et al.  Direct aperture optimization: a turnkey solution for step-and-shoot IMRT. , 2002, Medical physics.

[14]  Ying Xiao,et al.  The use of mixed-integer programming for inverse treatment planning with pre-defined field segments. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Arvind Kumar,et al.  A Column Generation Approach to Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Using Aperture Modulation , 2005, SIAM J. Optim..

[16]  C. Perez,et al.  Principles and Practice of Radiation Oncology , 1987 .

[17]  C. Ma,et al.  The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributions. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  P. Xia,et al.  Multileaf collimator leaf sequencing algorithm for intensity modulated beams with multiple static segments. , 1998, Medical physics.

[19]  D Yan,et al.  Implementing multiple static field delivery for intensity modulated beams. , 2001, Medical physics.

[20]  S Webb,et al.  A method to study the characteristics of 3D dose distributions created by superposition of many intensity-modulated beams delivered via a slit aperture with multiple absorbing vanes. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.