Discounting of delayed rewards in opioid-dependent outpatients: exponential or hyperbolic discounting functions?

Recent theories of substance abuse have used value discounting of delayed rewards to partly explain the decision to take drugs. Normative-economic theory holds that an exponential function describes the effects of delay on discounting, whereas the matching law posits a hyperbolic discounting function. The ability of these functions to describe 18 human heroin-dependent individuals' monetary- and heroin-reward delay-discounting functions was assessed. In the 1st condition, participants chose between immediate and delayed hypothetical monetary rewards. Delayed rewards were $1,000, and the immediate reward amount was adjusted until choices reflected indifference. In the 2nd condition, participants chose between immediate and delayed heroin (the delayed amount was that which each participant reported he or she could purchase with $1,000). The hyperbolic function produced significantly higher R2 values and significantly lower sums of squared error values. Consistent with previous findings, delayed heroin rewards were discounted at a significantly higher rate than were delayed monetary rewards.

[1]  Kelvin Lancaster,et al.  AN AXIOMATIC THEORY OF CONSUMER TIME PREFERENCE , 1963 .

[2]  G. Vaillant The natural history of narcotic drug addiction. , 1970, Seminars in psychiatry.

[3]  H Rachlin,et al.  Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  A. Wikler,et al.  Dynamics of drug dependence. Implications of a conditioning theory for research and treatment. , 1973, Archives of general psychiatry.

[5]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Self-control and general models of choice. , 1976 .

[6]  S. Siegel Morphine analgesic tolerance: its situation specificity supports a Pavlovian conditioning model. , 1976, Science.

[7]  D. Jasinski,et al.  Assessment of the Abuse Potentiality of Morphinelike Drugs (Methods Used in Man) , 1977 .

[8]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  David A. Eckerman,et al.  An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans. , 1980 .

[11]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement , 1981 .

[12]  L. Green,et al.  Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay , 1981 .

[13]  Douglas J. Navarick,et al.  Negative reinforcement and choice in humans , 1982 .

[14]  J. E. Mazur An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[15]  A. Logue,et al.  Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[16]  J. Milby,et al.  Methadone Maintenance to Abstinence: How Many Make It? , 1988, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[17]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  A Theory of Rational Addiction , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[18]  W. Bickel,et al.  A clinical trial of buprenorphine: Comparison with methadone in the detoxification of heroin addicts , 1988, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[19]  Schuster Cr Intravenous drug use and AIDS prevention. , 1988 .

[20]  W. Mischel,et al.  The nature of adolescent competencies predicted by preschool delay of gratification. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  S Magura,et al.  Determinants of needle sharing among intravenous drug users. , 1989, American journal of public health.

[22]  W. Mischel,et al.  Cognitive person variables in the delay of gratification of older children at risk. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  S. Lai,et al.  Sexual Behavior and the Risk of HIV Infection , 1990 .

[24]  Michael Grossman,et al.  Rational Addiction and the Effect of Price on Consumption , 1991 .

[25]  D. Cross,et al.  Subjective probability and delay. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[26]  B. Rounsaville,et al.  A comparative trial of psychotherapies for ambulatory cocaine abusers: relapse prevention and interpersonal psychotherapy. , 1991, The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse.

[27]  Factors Associated with Relapse Among Opiate Addicts in an Out-patient Detoxification Programme , 1992, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[28]  J. Elster,et al.  Choice Over Time , 1992 .

[29]  E. Chiauzzi,et al.  Taboo topics in addiction treatment. An empirical review of clinical folklore. , 1993, Journal of substance abuse treatment.

[30]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  PREFERENCES OVER TIME , 1993 .

[31]  Joel Myerson,et al.  ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SELF CONTROL , 1993 .

[32]  G. Badger,et al.  Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. , 1994, Archives of general psychiatry.

[33]  Dc Washington Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Ed. , 1994 .

[34]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison , 1994 .

[35]  M. Walton,et al.  Social settings and addiction relapse. , 1995, Journal of substance abuse.

[36]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of delayed rewards: Models of individual choice. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[37]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Preference Reversals Due to Myopic Discounting of Delayed Reward , 1995 .

[38]  Howard Rachlin,et al.  Self-control: Beyond commitment. , 1995 .

[39]  K. Kirby,et al.  Modeling Myopic Decisions: Evidence for Hyperbolic Delay-Discounting within Subjects and Amounts , 1995 .

[40]  S T Higgins,et al.  Sustained cocaine abstinence in methadone maintenance patients through voucher-based reinforcement therapy. , 1996, Archives of general psychiatry.

[41]  H. Rachlin Four teleological theories of addiction , 1997 .

[42]  W K Bickel,et al.  Impulsive and self-control choices in opioid-dependent patients and non-drug-using control participants: drug and monetary rewards. , 1997, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[43]  K. Kirby,et al.  Bidding on the Future: Evidence Against Normative Discounting of Delayed Rewards , 1997 .

[44]  G. Madden,et al.  The Price of Change: The Behavioral Economics of Drug Dependence , 1998 .

[45]  N. Heather,et al.  A conceptual framework for explaining drug addiction , 1998, Journal of psychopharmacology.

[46]  R. Vuchinich,et al.  Hyperbolic temporal discounting in social drinkers and problem drinkers. , 1998, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[47]  W. Bickel,et al.  Shortened time horizons and insensitivity to future consequences in heroin addicts. , 1998, Addiction.

[48]  W. Bickel,et al.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. , 1999 .

[49]  A. Odum,et al.  Needle sharing in opioid-dependent outpatients: psychological processes underlying risk. , 2000, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[50]  Faruk Gul,et al.  A Theory of Addiction , 2001 .