Electrophysiological correlates of early processing of visual word recognition: N2 as an index of visual category feature processing

A fundamental question in second language learning is how the brain separates inputs from different languages into distinct representation systems prior to semantic activation. The present study investigated this question using a silent reading task in which Latin letters and simple Chinese characters (including real characters and pseudocharacters) appeared randomly for 100 milliseconds (ms). High-density event-related potentials were employed to record the electrophysiological correlates of visual word recognition prior to motor response. The results showed that real Chinese characters and pseudocharacters produced a larger N2 response than letters within 200-300ms time window. However, no significant differences between real Chinese characters and pseudocharacters were found. The separation of two languages into their own systems might occur in the time window when N2 was elicited. The segregation of real Chinese characters and pseudocharacters was observed in a later time window (350-450ms). The category feature processing of stimuli might be responsible for the N2 response; the processing allows stimuli of the same category to be analyzed in their specific units and distinguishes different stimuli.

[1]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  John Macnamara,et al.  Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch , 1971 .

[3]  T. Allison,et al.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe , 1994, Nature.

[4]  A P Rudell,et al.  The recognition potential and conscious awareness. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  J. Hirsch,et al.  Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages , 1997, Nature.

[6]  Qiang Liu,et al.  The recognition potential reflects an intermediate level of visual representation , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  J. Grainger,et al.  Language blocking and lexical access in bilinguals , 1987 .

[8]  A P Rudell,et al.  The recognition potential contrasted with the P300. , 1991, The International journal of neuroscience.

[9]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[10]  Werner Sommer,et al.  ERP components reflecting stimulus identification: contrasting the recognition potential and the early repetition effect (N250r). , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  Timothy H Lucas,et al.  Functional separation of languages in the bilingual brain: a comparison of electrical stimulation language mapping in 25 bilingual patients and 117 monolingual control patients. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  Manuel Martín-Loeches,et al.  The Recognition Potential: An ERP Index of Lexical Access , 1999, Brain and Language.

[13]  P. Matthews,et al.  Category-related activation for written words in the posterior fusiform is task specific , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  M. Weisbrod,et al.  SOA-dependent N400 and P300 semantic priming effects using pseudoword primes and a delayed lexical decision. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[15]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Marilyn K. Strube,et al.  Automatic vs. controlled processes in semantic priming--differentiation by event-related potentials. , 2002, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  The recognition potential and the word frequency effect at a high rate of word presentation. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  M. Zotto,et al.  New insights into name category-related effects: is the Age of Acquisition a possible factor? , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[19]  A P Rudell,et al.  The recognition potential, word difficulty, and individual reading ability: on using event-related potentials to study perception. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  R. Adorni,et al.  Inferring native language from early bio-electrical activity , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[21]  Carlos Soares,et al.  Bilinguals in a monolingual and a bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[22]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[23]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language , 1997, Neuroreport.

[24]  Ying Liu,et al.  Visual Analysis and Lexical Access of Chinese Characters by Chinese as Second Language Readers , 2006 .

[25]  J. Qiu,et al.  Chinese character recognition in mirror reading: evidence from event-related potential. , 2009, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[26]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Shared and separate systems in bilingual language processing: Converging evidence from eyetracking and brain imaging , 2003, Brain and Language.

[28]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  J A Hinojosa,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of a semantic system commonly accessed by animals and tools categories. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  F. Rubia,et al.  Common basal extrastriate areas for the semantic processing of words and pictures , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[31]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  A. Rudell Rapid stream stimulation and the recognition potential. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  Qinglin Zhang,et al.  The recognition potential and rotated Chinese characters , 2008, Brain Research.

[34]  J. Qiu,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese and English words in a word generation task: an event-related potential study. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[35]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[36]  Miguel A. Pozo,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of automatic early semantic processing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[37]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  C. Pernet,et al.  Neural timing of visual implicit categorization. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.