Comparison of integrated whole-body [11C]choline PET/MR with PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer

PurposeTo evaluate the performance of conventional [11C]choline PET/CT in comparison to that of simultaneous whole-body PET/MR.MethodsThe study population comprised 32 patients with prostate cancer who underwent a single-injection dual-imaging protocol with PET/CT and subsequent PET/MR. PET/CT scans were performed applying standard clinical protocols (5 min after injection of 793 ± 69 MBq [11C]choline, 3 min per bed position, intravenous contrast agent). Subsequently (52 ± 15 min after injection) PET/MR was performed (4 min per bed position). PET images were reconstructed iteratively (OSEM 3D), scatter and attenuation correction of emission data and regional allocation of [11C]choline foci were performed using CT data for PET/CT and segmented Dixon MR, T1 and T2 sequences for PET/MR. Image quality of the respective PET scans and PET alignment with the respective morphological imaging modality were compared using a four point scale (0–3). Furthermore, number, location and conspicuity of the detected lesions were evaluated. SUVs for suspicious lesions, lung, liver, spleen, vertebral bone and muscle were compared.ResultsOverall 80 lesions were scored visually in 29 of the 32 patients. There was no significant difference between the two PET scans concerning number or conspicuity of the detected lesions (p not significant). PET/MR with T1 and T2 sequences performed better than PET/CT in anatomical allocation of lesions (2.87 ± 0.3 vs. 2.72 ± 0.5; p = 0.005). The quality of PET/CT images (2.97 ± 0.2) was better than that of the respective PET scan of the PET/MR (2.69 ± 0.5; p = 0.007). Overall the maximum and mean lesional SUVs exhibited high correlations between PET/CT and PET/MR (ρ = 0.87 and ρ = 0.86, respectively; both p < 0.001).ConclusionDespite a substantially later imaging time-point, the performance of simultaneous PET/MR was comparable to that of PET/CT in detecting lesions with increased [11C]choline uptake in patients with prostate cancer. Anatomical allocation of lesions was better with simultaneous PET/MR than with PET/CT, especially in the bone and pelvis. These promising findings suggest that [11C]choline PET/MR might have a diagnostic benefit compared to PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer, and now needs to be further evaluated in prospective trials.

[1]  P. Vernon,et al.  Application of intravenous contrast in PET/CT: does it really introduce significant attenuation correction error? , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  R. Wahl,et al.  Initial experience with FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of breast cancer , 2006, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  [11C]Choline uptake with PET/CT for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer: relation to PSA levels, tumour stage and anti-androgenic therapy , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[4]  Heinrich R Schelbert,et al.  Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  R. Miralbell,et al.  Evaluation of [18F]-choline PET/CT for staging and restaging of prostate cancer , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[7]  R. Wahl,et al.  PET/CT: comparison of quantitative tracer uptake between germanium and CT transmission attenuation-corrected images. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  FDG-PET/CT in re-staging of patients with lymphoma , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[9]  Peter L Choyke,et al.  Imaging prostate cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective. , 2007, Radiology.

[10]  O. Ratib,et al.  Genf 2009 , 2009, Nuklearmedizin.

[11]  G. Delso,et al.  Technical and methodological aspects of PET/MR , 2013, Clinical and Translational Imaging.

[12]  Hyunjin Park,et al.  Detection of Aggressive Primary Prostate Cancer with 11C-Choline PET/CT Using Multimodality Fusion Techniques , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Three-phase 18F-fluorocholine PET/CT in the evaluation of prostate cancer recurrence , 2008, Nuklearmedizin.

[14]  H. Jadvar Prostate Cancer: PET with 18F-FDG, 18F- or 11C-Acetate, and 18F- or 11C-Choline , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  B. Bendriem,et al.  Performance Characteristics of a New LSO PET/CT Scanner With Extended Axial Field-of-View and PSF Reconstruction , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[16]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  [(11)C]Choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging and restaging of patients with advanced prostate cancer. , 2008, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[17]  S. Reske [11C]Choline uptake with PET/CT for the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer: relation to PSA levels, tumour stage and anti-androgenic therapy , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  S. Kohlfuerst,et al.  The value of 18F-Choline PET/CT in patients with elevated PSA-level and negative prostate needle biopsy for localisation of prostate cancer , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[19]  G. Glatting,et al.  [11C]choline PET/CT imaging in occult local relapse of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[20]  S. Holm,et al.  PET/CT with intravenous contrast can be used for PET attenuation correction in cancer patients , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  Y. Erdi,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases in patients with oral cancer staged N0 by clinical examination and CT/MRI. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[22]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[23]  Michael Souvatzoglou,et al.  Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[24]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  The detection rate of [11C]Choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[25]  Ernst J. Rummeny,et al.  Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions , 2011, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Dual-modality PET/CT imaging: the effect of respiratory motion on combined image quality in clinical oncology , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[27]  Wolfgang A Weber,et al.  Technology Insight: advances in molecular imaging and an appraisal of PET/CT scanning , 2008, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[28]  F. Fazio,et al.  11C-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for preoperative lymph-node staging in intermediate-risk and high-risk prostate cancer: comparison with clinical staging nomograms. , 2008, European urology.

[29]  Heiko Schöder,et al.  Positron emission tomography for prostate, bladder, and renal cancer. , 2004, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[30]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  Cyrill Burger,et al.  PET-CT image co-registration in the thorax: influence of respiration , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[32]  A. Kawashima,et al.  The utility of 11C-choline PET/CT for imaging prostate cancer: a pictorial guide. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  B. Weber,et al.  18F-choline in experimental soft tissue infection assessed with autoradiography and high-resolution PET , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[34]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Predictive factors of [11C]choline PET/CT in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[35]  J. Pruim,et al.  Preoperative staging of pelvic lymph nodes in prostate cancer by 11C-choline PET. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[36]  Yuji Nakamoto,et al.  Respiratory motion artifacts on PET emission images obtained using CT attenuation correction on PET-CT , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[37]  A. Bogni,et al.  [11C]Methylation on a C18 Sep-Pak cartridge: a convenient way to produce [N-methyl-11C]choline , 2000 .

[38]  I. Sesterhenn,et al.  Localization of primary prostate cancer with dual-phase 18F-fluorocholine PET. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  T. Hara 11C-choline and 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose in tumor imaging with positron emission tomography. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[40]  C. Nanni,et al.  Influence of Trigger PSA and PSA Kinetics on 11C-Choline PET/CT Detection Rate in Patients with Biochemical Relapse After Radical Prostatectomy , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  G. V. von Schulthess,et al.  Staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  E. Glatstein,et al.  Imaging Prostate Cancer with 11C-Choline PET/CT , 2008 .

[43]  A. Drzezga,et al.  First Clinical Experience with Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR: Comparison to PET/CT in Patients with Oncologic Diagnoses , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Gerald Antoch,et al.  Focal tracer uptake: a potential artifact in contrast-enhanced dual-modality PET/CT scans. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[45]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Standardised uptake values from PET/CT images: comparison with conventional attenuation-corrected PET , 2007, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[46]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.