A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection.

A statistical methodology is presented based on a chi-square probability analysis that allows the automated discrimination of radiolucent tissue (fat) from radiographic densities (fibroglandular tissue) in digitized mammograms. The method is based on earlier work developed at this facility that shows mammograms may be considered as evolving from a linear filtering operation where a random input field is passed through a 1/f filtering process. The filtering process is reversible which allows the solution of the input field with knowledge obtained from the raw image (the output). The input field solution is analogous to a prewhitening technique or deconvolution. This field contains all the information of the raw image in a much simplified format that can be approximated and analyzed with parametric methods. In the work presented here evidence indicates that there are two random events occurring in the input field with differing variances: (1) one relating to fat tissue with the smaller variance, and (2) the second relating to all other tissue with the larger variance. A statistical comparison of the variances is made by scanning the image with a small search window. A relaxation method allows for making a reliable estimate of the smaller variance which is considered as the global reference. If a local variance deviates significantly from the reference variance, based on chi-square analysis, it is labeled as nonfat; otherwise it is labeled as fat. This statistical test procedure results in a region by region continuous labeling of fat and nonfat tissue across the image. In the work presented here, the emphasis is on the methodology development with supporting preliminary results that are very encouraging. It is widely accepted that mammographic density is a breast cancer risk factor. An important application of this work is to incorporate density-based risk analysis into the ongoing statistical-based detection work developed at this facility. Additional applications include risk analysis dependent on either percentages or total amounts of fat or dense tissue. This work may be considered as the initial step in introducing many of the known breast cancer risk factors into the actual image data analysis.

[1]  I. Fentiman,et al.  Relationship of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer risk factors and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study. , 1990, International journal of epidemiology.

[2]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Laurence P. Clarke,et al.  Multiresolution probability analysis of random fields , 1999 .

[4]  A. Oza,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[5]  R N Hoover,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  On the statistical nature of mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[7]  D. K. Cullers,et al.  Multiresolution statistical analysis of high-resolution digital mammograms , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[10]  N F Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk , 1997, Cancer.

[11]  John N. Wolfe,et al.  A Study of Breast Parenchyma by Mammography In the Normal Woman and Those with Benign and Malignant Disease , 1967 .

[12]  E. Fishell,et al.  Radio-free America: what to do with the waste. , 1994, Environmental health perspectives.

[13]  J. Brisson,et al.  Family history of breast cancer, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. , 1991, Epidemiology.

[14]  N. Boyd,et al.  The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. , 1992, Cancer detection and prevention.

[15]  N. Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. , 1993, Radiology.

[17]  R N Hoover,et al.  Mammographic densities and risk of breast cancer , 1991, Cancer.

[18]  F Merletti,et al.  Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  M Souto,et al.  Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Laurence P. Clarke,et al.  Multiresolution probability analysis of gray-scaled images , 1998 .

[21]  M. Szklo,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. , 1987, Epidemiologic reviews.

[22]  C. Byrne,et al.  Studying mammographic density: implications for understanding breast cancer. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[23]  M P Eckstein,et al.  Why do anatomic backgrounds reduce lesion detectability? , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[24]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  S Ciatto,et al.  A prospective study of the value of mammographic patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk in a screening experience. , 1993, European journal of radiology.

[29]  J N Wolfe The prominent duct pattern as an indicator of cancer risk. , 1969, Oncology.

[30]  P. Taylor,et al.  Measuring image texture to separate "difficult" from "easy" mammograms. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.

[31]  E. Roebuck,et al.  The importance of mammographic parenchymal patterns. , 1982, The British journal of radiology.

[32]  Isabelle E. Magnin,et al.  Mammographic Texture Analysis: An Evaluation Of Risk For Developing Breast Cancer , 1986 .

[33]  J Benichou,et al.  Proportion of breast cancer cases in the United States explained by well-established risk factors. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[34]  G H Whitehouse,et al.  Factors associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns. , 1988, Clinical radiology.

[35]  Laurence P. Clarke,et al.  Multiresolution analysis of two-dimensional 1/f processes: approximation methods for random variable transformations , 1999 .

[36]  E. Fishell,et al.  Mammographic patterns and breast cancer risk: methodologic standards and contradictory results. , 1984, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  J. Wolfe Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern , 1976, Cancer.

[38]  John N. Wolfe,et al.  Mammography: Ducts as a Sole Indicator of Breast Carcinoma1 , 1967 .