MR imaging of the ankle at 3 Tesla and 1.5 Tesla: protocol optimization and application to cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in cadaver specimens

The objective of this study was to optimize ankle joint MR imaging in volunteers at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0 T, and to compare these optimized sequences concerning image quality and performance in assessing cartilage, ligament and tendon pathology in fresh human cadaver specimens. Initially our clinical ankle protocol consisting of T1-weighted (-w), fat-saturated (fs) T2-w, and short τ inversion-recovery fast spinecho (FSE) sequences was optimized at 1.5 T and 3.0 T by two radiologists. For dedicated cartilage imaging, fs-intermediate (IM)-w FSE, fs spoiled gradient echo, and balanced free-precession steady-state sequences were optimized. Using the optimized sequences, thirteen cadaver ankle joints were imaged. Four radiologists independently assessed these images concerning image quality and pathology. All radiologists consistently rated image quality higher at 3.0 T (all sequences p<0.05). For detecting cartilage pathology, diagnostic performance was significantly higher at 3.0 T (ROC-values up to 0.93 vs. 0.77; p<0.05); the fs-IM FSE sequence showed highest values among the different sequences. Average sensitivity for detecting tendon pathology was 63% at 3.0 T vs. 41% at 1.5 T and was significantly higher at 3.0 T for 2 out of 4 radiologists (p<0.05). Compared to 1.5 T, imaging of the ankle joint at 3.0 T significantly improved image quality and diagnostic performance in assessing cartilage pathology.

[1]  Baker Jm,et al.  Complex ankle instability. , 2000, Foot and ankle clinics.

[2]  Walter Heindel,et al.  FLAIR imaging for multiple sclerosis: a comparative MR study at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla , 2006, European Radiology.

[3]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Cartilage MR imaging at 3.0 versus that at 1.5 T: preliminary results in a porcine model. , 2005, Radiology.

[4]  A. Ba-Ssalamah,et al.  Imaging articular cartilage defects in the ankle joint with 3D fat‐suppressed echo planar imaging: Comparison with conventional 3D fat‐suppressed gradient echo imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  A. Catanzariti,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and surgical correlation of peroneus brevis tears. , 2004, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[6]  D. Sartoris,et al.  MR imaging of articular cartilage in the ankle: comparison of available imaging sequences and methods of measurement in cadavers , 1996, Skeletal Radiology.

[7]  Michael B. Smith,et al.  Signal‐to‐noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of “90°” RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  H. Bruhn,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of hyaline cartilage defects at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of medium T2‐weighted fast spin echo, T1‐weighted two‐dimensional and three‐dimensional gradient echo pulse sequences , 2005, Acta radiologica.

[9]  M. Sobel,et al.  Cadaver Correlation of Peroneal Tendon Changes with Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1991, Foot & ankle.

[10]  B. Donley,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Foot and Ankle , 2001, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[11]  Garry E Gold,et al.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  Graham Wright,et al.  Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0 T: relaxation times and image contrast. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  M. Gutberlet,et al.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T , 2005, European Radiology.

[14]  G. Simonetti,et al.  Imaging the Ankle and Foot and Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2003, The international journal of lower extremity wounds.

[15]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Rapid musculoskeletal MRI with phase-sensitive steady-state free precession: comparison with routine knee MRI. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  G. Adam,et al.  Multicontrast-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla: ex-vivo comparison with histopathologic correlation , 2006, European Radiology.

[17]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  MR imaging of articular cartilage at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of SPGR and SSFP sequences. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[18]  Ronald W. Smith,et al.  Characterization of Patients with Primary Peroneus Longus Tendinopathy: a Review of Twenty-Two Cases , 2000, Foot & ankle international.

[19]  I. Nöbauer-Huhmann,et al.  Impact of high field (3.0 T) magnetic resonance imaging on diagnosis of osteochondral defects in the ankle joint. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[20]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[21]  R. Kerr.  MRI of soft tissue disorders of the ankle. , 2002, Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery.

[22]  John T. Campbell,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Ankle: Techniques and Spectrum of Disease , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  F. Noyes,et al.  A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy , 1989, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  D G Disler,et al.  MR imaging of articular cartilage. , 1998, Skeletal radiology.

[25]  Thomas D Brown,et al.  Cartilage thickness in cadaveric ankles: measurement with double-contrast multi-detector row CT arthrography versus MR imaging. , 2004, Radiology.

[26]  T. Pope,et al.  Practical MRI of the Foot and Ankle , 2000 .

[27]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Joint magnetic resonance imaging: normal variants and pitfalls related to sports injury. , 2002, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[28]  B Stoeckel,et al.  [3 Tesla MRI: successful results with higher field strengths]. , 2004, Der Radiologe.

[29]  Dwight G Nishimura,et al.  Comparison of new sequences for high‐resolution cartilage imaging , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  B. Digiovanni,et al.  Ankle pain and peroneal tendon pathology. , 2004, Clinics in sports medicine.