Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention

In letter-identification reaction time experiments, a redundant-signals advantage was obtained when one location contained an irrelevant letter on single-target trials. It was not obtained when the position was blank. This confirms a prediction from a previous analysis in terms of variable criterion theory. The intercept of the linear function relating the growth of excitatory strength for redundant targets to that for the sum of single-target strengths is determined by the presence or absence of an irrelevant distractor. This confirms a second prediction. In this task, the redundant-signals advantage is due to distraction from an irrelevant stimulus occupying a relevant location. There is also evidence for a smaller distraction effect even from a redundant target. These findings are inconsistent with predictions of separate activation theory. Apparent differences be-tween these results and those of tachistoscopic recognition experiments are discussed.

[1]  V A Spiker,et al.  Variable criterion analysis of individual differences and stimulus similarity in choice reaction time , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  D. Raab DIVISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: STATISTICAL FACILITATION OF SIMPLE REACTION TIMES* , 1962 .

[4]  H E Egeth,et al.  Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  R. Wallace,et al.  S-R compatibility and the idea of a response code. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Charles W. Eriksen,et al.  Internal perceptual system noise and redundancy in simultaneous inputs in form identification , 1965 .

[7]  G. Grice,et al.  Development of associative and perceptual interference , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  R. Ratcliff Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  E. Smith,et al.  Choice reaction time: an analysis of the major theoretical positions. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  G R Grice,et al.  Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.