Comparing school ownership performance using a pseudo-panel database: A Malmquist-type index approach

[1]  Milton Friedman,et al.  Free to Choose , 1980 .

[2]  Kristof De Witte,et al.  Efficiency in education: a review of literature and a way forward , 2017, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[3]  Jill Johnes,et al.  Operational Research in education , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  A cost Malmquist productivity index capturing group performance , 2015, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Mohsen Afsharian,et al.  The overall Malmquist index: a new approach for measuring productivity changes over time , 2015, Ann. Oper. Res..

[6]  Rui Cunha Marques,et al.  Did the corporatization of Portuguese hospitals significantly change their productivity? , 2015, The European Journal of Health Economics.

[7]  S. Grosskopf,et al.  Efficiency in Education: Research and Implications , 2014 .

[8]  John Ruggiero,et al.  Nonparametric estimation of education productivity incorporating nondiscretionary inputs with an application to Dutch schools , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Daniel Santín,et al.  Does school ownership matter? An unbiased efficiency comparison for regions of Spain , 2014 .

[10]  H. Essid,et al.  Productivity, efficiency, and technical change of Tunisian schools: a bootstrapped Malmquist approach with quasi-fixed inputs , 2014 .

[11]  A. Camanho,et al.  Assessing the evolution of school performance and value-added: trends over four years , 2013 .

[12]  Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz,et al.  Dynamics of productivity in higher education: cross-european evidence based on bootstrapped Malmquist indices , 2013 .

[13]  Álvaro Choi,et al.  The efficiency of public and publicly subsidized high schools in Spain: Evidence from PISA-2006 , 2012, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[14]  Ana S. Camanho,et al.  Performance comparison of retailing stores using a Malmquist-type index , 2012, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  E. Hanushek,et al.  Does School Autonomy Make Sense Everywhere? Panel Estimates from PISA , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  Daniel Santín,et al.  Measuring educational efficiency at student level with parametric stochastic distance functions: an application to Spanish PISA results , 2011 .

[17]  An De,et al.  Human Capital and Productivity , 2011 .

[18]  M. J. Mancebón,et al.  Private versus public high schools in Spain: disentangling managerial and programme efficiencies , 2008, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[19]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The role of cognitive skills in economic development , 2008 .

[20]  Jesus T. Pastor,et al.  Circularity of the Malmquist productivity index , 2007 .

[21]  K. Duncan,et al.  Explaining the Performance Gap between Public and Private School Students , 2007 .

[22]  M. Shermer.  Free to choose. , 2007, Scientific American.

[23]  Andreas Schleicher,et al.  PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World , 2007 .

[24]  Robert G. Dyson,et al.  Data envelopment analysis and Malmquist indices for measuring group performance , 2006 .

[25]  David Newhouse,et al.  The Effect of School Type on Academic Achievement , 2006, The Journal of Human Resources.

[26]  J. Pastor,et al.  A global Malmquist productivity index , 2005 .

[27]  David Newhouse,et al.  The Effect of School Type on Academic Achievement: Evidence from Indonesia , 2005 .

[28]  Christian Monseur.  PISA 2003 Data Analysis Manual : spss users , 2005 .

[29]  V. Vandenberghe,et al.  Evaluating the effectiveness of private education across countries: a comparison of methods , 2004 .

[30]  Caroline M. Hoxby,et al.  The Economics of School Choice , 2003 .

[31]  M. A. Muñiz,et al.  Separating managerial inefficiency and external conditions in data envelopment analysis , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[32]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The Failure of Input-Based Schooling Policies , 2002 .

[33]  Finn R. F F rsund.  On the circularity of the Malmquist productivity index , 2002 .

[34]  Patrick T. Harker,et al.  Note: Ranking DMUs with Infeasible Super-Efficiency DEA Models , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[35]  Rj Adams,et al.  Plausible Values: Why they are important , 2002 .

[36]  Finn R. Førsund,et al.  ON THE CIRCULARITY OF THE MALMQUIST PRODUCTIVITY INDEX , 2002 .

[37]  Geraint Johnes,et al.  The effect of competition on the efficiency of secondary schools in England , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[38]  A. Worthington.  An Empirical Survey of Frontier Efficiency Measurement Techniques in Education , 2001 .

[39]  P. McEwan.  The Effectiveness of Public, Catholic, and Non-Religious Private Schools in Chile's Voucher System , 2001 .

[40]  Ludger Woessmann.  Why Students in Some Countries Do Better: International Evidence on the Importance of Education Policy. , 2001 .

[41]  Jerik Hanushek,et al.  Schooling, Labor-force Quality, and the Growth of Nations , 2000 .

[42]  C. Hoxby.  The Effects of Class Size on Student Achievement: New Evidence from Population Variation , 2000 .

[43]  Thomas J. Nechyba,et al.  Mobility, Targeting, and Private-School Vouchers , 2000 .

[44]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  C. Lovell,et al.  A generalized Malmquist productivity index , 1999 .

[46]  T. Kirjavainen,et al.  Efficiency differences of finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and Tobit analysis , 1998 .

[47]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  Assessing the Effects of School Resources on Student Performance: An Update , 1997 .

[48]  S. Ray,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH, TECHNICAL PROGRESS AND EFFICIENCY CHANGE IN INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES: COMMENT , 1997 .

[49]  Dan Goldhaber.  Public and private high schools: Is school choice an answer to the productivity problem? , 1996 .

[50]  Rikard Althin,et al.  A new, transitive productivity index , 1996 .

[51]  D. Primont,et al.  Multi-Output Production and Duality: Theory and Applications , 1994 .

[52]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[53]  F. Førsund,et al.  Banking efficiency in the Nordic countries , 1993 .

[54]  Steven C. Deller,et al.  Production efficiency in elementary education: The case of Maine public schools , 1993 .

[55]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: A non-parametric Malmquist approach , 1992 .

[56]  Robert J. Mislevy,et al.  Estimating Population Characteristics From Sparse Matrix Samples of Item Responses , 1992 .

[57]  D. Treiman,et al.  A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status , 1992 .

[58]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Politics, Markets, and America's Schools , 1990 .

[59]  Eric A. Hanushek,et al.  The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools , 1986 .

[60]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF INDEX NUMBERS AND THE MEASUREMENT OF INPUT, OUTPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY , 1982 .

[61]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Evaluating Program and Managerial Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Program Follow Through , 1981 .

[62]  E. Hanushek.  Conceptual and Empirical Issues in the Estimation of Educational Production Functions , 1979 .

[63]  H. Levin.  Measuring Efficiency in Educational Production , 1974 .

[64]  R. Shepherd.  Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[65]  A. Alchian.  Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory , 1950, Journal of Political Economy.

[66]  Ragnar Frisch,et al.  Annual Survey of General Economic Theory: The Problem of Index Numbers , 1936 .