Enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production: determining optimal enzyme loading using neural networks

BACKGROUND: The efficient production of a fermentable hydrolyzate is an immensely important requirement in the utilization of lignocellulosic biomass as a feedstock in bioethanol production processes. The identification of the optimal enzyme loading is of particular importance to maximize the amount of glucose produced from lignocellulosic materials while maintaining low costs. This requirement can only be achieved by incorporating reliable methodologies to properly address the optimization problem. RESULTS: In this work, a data-driven technique based on artificial neural networks and design of experiments have been integrated in order to identify the optimal enzyme combination. The enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse was used as a case study. This technique was used to build up a model of the combined effects of cellulase (FPU/L) and β-glucosidase (CBU/L) loads on glucose yield (%) after enzymatic hydrolysis. The optimal glucose yield, above 99%, was achieved with cellulase and β-glucosidase concentrations in the ranges of 460.0 to 580.0 FPU L−1 (15.3–19.3 FPU g−1 bagasse) and 750.0 to 1140.0 CBU L−1 (2–38 CBU g−1 bagasse), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic model developed can be used not only to the prediction of glucose concentration profiles for different enzymatic loadings, but also to obtain the optimum enzymes loading that leads to high glucose yield. It can promote both a successful hydrolysis process control and a more effective employment of enzymes. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry

[1]  Rekha S. Singhal,et al.  Comparison of artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) in fermentation media optimization: Case study of fermentative production of scleroglucan , 2008 .

[2]  Suren Singh,et al.  Response surface optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of maize starch for higher glucose production , 2005 .

[3]  Elmer Ccopa Rivera,et al.  Development of adaptive modeling techniques to describe the temperature-dependent kinetics of biotechnological processes , 2007 .

[4]  Mukta Paliwal,et al.  Neural networks and statistical techniques: A review of applications , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  Rajeev Kumar,et al.  Effect of enzyme supplementation at moderate cellulase loadings on initial glucose and xylose release from corn stover solids pretreated by leading technologies , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  H. R. Sørensen,et al.  Optimization of Reaction Conditions for Enzymatic Viscosity Reduction and Hydrolysis of Wheat Arabinoxylan in an Industrial Ethanol Fermentation Residue , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[7]  Mats Galbe,et al.  Comparison of the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolyzates of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by steam explosion using different impregnating agents , 2002, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[8]  G. Zeeman,et al.  Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[9]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Fuel ethanol production from lignocellulose: a challenge for metabolic engineering and process integration , 2001, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[10]  H. R. Sørensen,et al.  The minimal enzyme cocktail concept for biomass processing , 2009 .

[11]  X. P. Liao,et al.  Adaptive adjustment of plastic injection processes based on neural network , 2007 .

[12]  T. K. Ghose Measurement of cellulase activities , 1987 .

[13]  Dehua Liu,et al.  Enhancement of the enzymatic digestibility of sugarcane bagasse by alkali-peracetic acid pretreatment. , 2009 .

[14]  R. M. Filho,et al.  A Comparison between Lime and Alkaline Hydrogen Peroxide Pretreatments of Sugarcane Bagasse for Ethanol Production , 2008, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[15]  Elmer Ccopa Rivera,et al.  Ethyl alcohol production optimization by coupling genetic algorithm and multilayer perceptron neural network. , 2006, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[16]  I. Boyaci,et al.  Modeling and optimization II: Comparison of estimation capabilities of response surface methodology with artificial neural networks in a biochemical reaction , 2007 .

[17]  João A. Queiroz,et al.  Response surface optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of Cistus ladanifer and Cytisus striatus for bioethanol production , 2009 .

[18]  K. Prasanthi,et al.  Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated sugar cane leaves to ethanol , 1998 .

[19]  F. Felissia,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of organosolv pre-treatment of sugar cane bagasse for glucose production: Application of 23 experimental design , 2010 .

[20]  Y. Zhuang,et al.  Optimization of cellulase mixture for efficient hydrolysis of steam-exploded corn stover by statistically designed experiments. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[21]  Carlos A Cardona,et al.  Fuel ethanol production: process design trends and integration opportunities. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[22]  Pedro Paulo Balestrassi,et al.  Design of experiments on neural network's training for nonlinear time series forecasting , 2009, Neurocomputing.

[23]  George Cybenko,et al.  Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function , 1992, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[24]  Harish Kumar Sharma,et al.  Optimization of Enzymatic Hydrolysis Pretreatment Conditions for Enhanced Juice Recovery from Guava Fruit Using Response Surface Methodology , 2009 .

[25]  David K. Johnson,et al.  Biomass Recalcitrance: Engineering Plants and Enzymes for Biofuels Production , 2007, Science.

[26]  Luiz Augusto da Cruz Meleiro,et al.  ANN-based soft-sensor for real-time process monitoring and control of an industrial polymerization process , 2009, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[27]  R. M. Filho,et al.  Lime Pretreatment of Sugarcane Bagasse for Bioethanol Production , 2009, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.