A hierarchical competing systems model of the emergence and early development of executive function.

The hierarchical competing systems model (HCSM) provides a framework for understanding the emergence and early development of executive function--the cognitive processes underlying the conscious control of behavior--in the context of search for hidden objects. According to this model, behavior is determined by the joint influence of a developmentally invariant habit system and a conscious representational system that becomes increasingly influential as children develop. This article describes a computational formalization of the HCSM, reviews behavioral and computational research consistent with the model, and suggests directions for future research on the development of executive function.

[1]  G. Gratch,et al.  Piaget's stage IV object concept error: evidence of forgetting or object conception? , 1974, Child development.

[2]  C. L. Hull,et al.  A proposed quantification of habit strength. , 1947, Psychological review.

[3]  Yuko Munakata,et al.  Perseverative reaching in infancy: The roles of hidden toys and motor history in the AB task , 1997 .

[4]  K. Espy,et al.  Executive Functioning in Preschool Children: Performance on A-Not-B and Other Delayed Response Format Tasks , 1999, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[6]  Bruce D. Homer,et al.  Seeing objects as symbols and symbols as objects: Language and the development of dual representation. , 2005 .

[7]  Philip David Zelazo,et al.  On the possible roots of cognitive flexibility , 2005 .

[8]  J. Reznick,et al.  Representational flexibility and response control in a multistep multilocation search task. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[9]  David A. Boas,et al.  Frontal Lobe Activation during Object Permanence: Data from Near-Infrared Spectroscopy , 2002, NeuroImage.

[10]  R. Davidson,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV , 1976 .

[11]  F. N. Dempster,et al.  The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging , 1992 .

[12]  Philip David Zelazo,et al.  The Influence of Number of A Trials on 2-Year-Olds' Behavior in Two A-Not-B-Type Search Tasks: A Test of the Hierarchical Competing Systems Model , 2006 .

[13]  J. Kagan,et al.  The growth of memory during infancy. , 1979, Genetic psychology monographs.

[14]  J. G. Bremner,et al.  Spatial errors made by infants: inadequate spatial cues or evidence of egocentrism? , 1978, British journal of psychology.

[15]  Anne R. Schutte,et al.  Unifying Representations and Responses , 2004, Psychological science.

[16]  W. F. Landers Effects of differential experience on infants' performance in a Piagetian Stage IV object-concept task. , 1971 .

[17]  C. Jacobsen,et al.  Studies of cerebral function in primates. I. The functions of the frontal association areas in monkeys. , 1936 .

[18]  J. Reznick,et al.  Response modality affects human infant delayed-response performance. , 1996, Child development.

[19]  J. Deloache Symbolic functioning in very young children: understanding of pictures and models. , 1991, Child development.

[20]  D. Stuss,et al.  Principles of frontal lobe function , 2002 .

[21]  Philip David Zelazo,et al.  The A‐Not‐B Error: Results from a Logistic Meta‐Analysis , 1999 .

[22]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  Why do young infants fail to search for hidden objects? , 1990, Cognition.

[23]  P. Goldman-Rakic Circuitry of Primate Prefrontal Cortex and Regulation of Behavior by Representational Memory , 2011 .

[24]  D. Mareschal,et al.  A computational and neuropsychological account of object‐oriented behaviours in infancy , 1999 .

[25]  T. Hershey,et al.  Short- and Long-Term Spatial Delayed Response Performance Across the Lifespan , 2004, Developmental neuropsychology.

[26]  T. Shallice A theory of consciousness. , 1979, Science.

[27]  Esther Thelen,et al.  U-Shaped Changes in Behavior: A Dynamic Systems Perspective , 2004 .

[28]  D. Schacter,et al.  Infants, Amnesics, and Dissociable Memory Systems , 1984 .

[29]  L. Acredolo,et al.  The role of attentiveness, mobility history, and separation of hiding sites on stage IV search behavior , 1986 .

[30]  G. Butterworth Object disappearance and error in Piaget's Stage IV task. , 1977 .

[31]  Z. Dienes,et al.  Developmental aspects of consciousness: How much theory of mind do you need to be consciously aware? , 2003, Consciousness and Cognition.

[32]  R. Johansson,et al.  Action plans used in action observation , 2003, Nature.

[33]  W. S. Hunter The delayed reaction in a child. , 1917 .

[34]  L. R Gleitman,et al.  Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2000 .

[35]  S. M. Carlson Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool Children , 2005, Developmental neuropsychology.

[36]  Anne R. Schutte,et al.  Testing the dynamic field theory: working memory for locations becomes more spatially precise over development. , 2003, Child development.

[37]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Tests of a dynamic systems account of the A-not-B error: the influence of prior experience on the spatial memory abilities of two-year-olds. , 2001, Child development.

[38]  J. M. Warren,et al.  THE FRONTAL GRANULAR CORTEX AND BEHAVIOR , 1964 .

[39]  Y. Munakata,et al.  Active versus latent representations: a neural network model of perseveration, dissociation, and decalage. , 2002, Developmental psychobiology.

[40]  E. Thelen,et al.  The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  A. Diamond Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. , 2002 .

[42]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Object permanence in young infants: further evidence. , 1991, Child development.

[43]  T. G. R. Bower,et al.  The effects of motor skill on object permanence , 1972 .

[44]  David F. Bjorklund,et al.  The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition. , 1990 .

[45]  D. A. Grant,et al.  A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[46]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework of perception and action , 2001 .

[47]  P. Zelazo The development of conscious control in childhood , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  P. Harris Perseverative search at a visibly empty place by young infants. , 1974 .

[49]  A. Diamond,et al.  Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infants' performance on AB. , 1985, Child development.

[50]  P L Harris,et al.  Perseverative errors in search by young infants. , 1973, Child development.

[51]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. , 1997, Psychological review.

[52]  J. Noland It Is Not Just About Location: Infants Perseverate to Container Shape During Object Search. , 2007, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[53]  C. Nelson,et al.  Handbook of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience , 2001 .

[54]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Theory of Consciousness , 2009 .

[55]  D. A. Grant,et al.  Continuities and Discontinuities in Conceptual Behavior in a Card Sorting Problem , 1954 .

[56]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[57]  S. M. Carlson,et al.  Less Is More , 2005, Psychological science.

[58]  Elizabeth Ligon Bjork,et al.  Search Behavior on Multi-Choice Hiding Tasks: Evidence for an Objective Conception of Space in Infancy , 1983 .

[59]  Mark A. Schmuckler,et al.  The Effect of the Number of A Trials on Performance on the A‐Not‐B Task , 2002 .

[60]  A. Diamond,et al.  The relationship between cognition and action: performance of children 3 1 2 –7 years old on a stroop- like day-night test , 1994, Cognition.

[61]  P D Zelazo,et al.  The emergence of consciousness. , 1998, Advances in neurology.

[62]  A. Diamond,et al.  The performance of human infants on a measure of frontal cortex function, the delayed response task. , 1989, Developmental psychobiology.

[63]  K. Espy The Shape School: Assessing executive function in preschool children , 1997 .

[64]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[65]  WiLFORD,et al.  The Delayed Reaction in Animals and Children , 2010 .

[66]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Knowing in the context of acting: the task dynamics of the A-not-B error. , 1999, Psychological review.

[67]  J. Changeux,et al.  A Simple Model of Prefrontal Cortex Function in Delayed-Response Tasks , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  Ulrich Müller,et al.  The development of executive function in early childhood: I. The development of executive function. , 2003 .

[69]  Kim Plunkett,et al.  Developing object permanence: A connectionist model , 1995 .

[70]  J. Fuster Prefrontal Cortex , 2018 .

[71]  P. Zelazo,et al.  A Generative Connectionist Model of the Development of Rule Use in Children , 2000 .

[72]  T. Ruffman,et al.  Why do infants make A not B errors in a search task, yet show memory for the location of hidden objects in a nonsearch task? , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[73]  Anne R. Schutte,et al.  Generalizing the dynamic field theory of the A-not-B error beyond infancy: three-year-olds' delay- and experience-dependent location memory biases. , 2002, Child development.

[74]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  H. Pashler Attentional Limitations in Doing Two Tasks at the Same Time , 1992 .

[76]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[77]  R. Duncan Luce Where is Mathematical Modeling in Psychology Headed? , 1999 .

[78]  M. Freedman,et al.  Mnemonic precedence in amnesic patients: an analogue of the AB error in infants? , 1986, Child development.

[79]  R. K. Clifton,et al.  Is visually guided reaching in early infancy a myth? , 1993, Child development.

[80]  Stephanie M. Carlson,et al.  Development of executive function during childhood , 2016 .

[81]  John R. Anderson Problem solving and learning. , 1993 .

[82]  H. Wellman,et al.  Infant search and object permanence: a meta-analysis of the A-not-B error. , 1987, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[83]  Jeffrey L. Elman,et al.  Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[84]  Michael R. Trimble The Prefrontal Cortex; Anatomy, Physiology and Neuropsychology of the Frontal Lobe (2nd edn). By Joaquin M. Fuster. New York: Raven Press. 1989. 255 pp. , 1989 .

[85]  H. Wellman,et al.  Selective information use and perseveration in the search behavior of infants and young children. , 1983, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[86]  B. Hood,et al.  Reaching in the dark to an object's remembered position: Evidence for object permanence in 5-month-old infants , 1986 .

[87]  Adele Diamond,et al.  AB with multiple wells. I: Why are multiple wells sometimes easier than two wells?. II: memory or memory + inhibition? , 1994 .

[88]  J. Rivière,et al.  The C-not-B error: a comparative study , 2003 .

[89]  P. Bryant,et al.  The effect of spatial cues on infants’ responses in the AB task, with and without a hidden object. , 2001 .

[90]  Y. Munakata,et al.  All Together Now: When Dissociations Between Knowledge and Action Disappear , 2001, Psychological science.

[91]  M. W. Daehler,et al.  Representation and Perseveration: Influences on Young Children's Representational Insight , 2001 .

[92]  Y. Munakata Article with Peer Commentaries and Response Infant Perseveration and Implications for Object Permanence Theories: a Pdp Model of the Ab B Task , 2022 .

[93]  N. Block,et al.  The nature of consciousness : philosophical debates , 1997 .

[94]  Natasha Z. Kirkham,et al.  ARTICLE WITH PEER COMMENTARIES AND RESPONSE Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task , 2003 .

[95]  Linda B Smith,et al.  Young infants reach correctly in A-not-B tasks: on the development of stability and perseveration. , 2006, Infant behavior & development.

[96]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[97]  P. Zelazo,et al.  Executive Function in Typical and Atypical Development , 2010 .

[98]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Spatiotemporal identity in infancy: Perceptual competence or conceptual deficit? , 1982 .

[99]  J. Perner,et al.  Development of theory of mind and executive control , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[100]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[101]  F. Craik,et al.  Executive function across the life span. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[102]  T. Shultz Computational Developmental Psychology , 2003 .