Association Between Hospital Cardiac Management and Outcomes for Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients

Background:Randomized trials have shown that medical and interventional therapies improve outcomes for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients. The extent to which hospital quality improvement translates into better patient outcomes is unclear. Objectives:To determine hospital cardiac management markers associated with improved outcomes. Research Design, Subjects:Population-based longitudinal cohort study of 98,115 adults hospitalized with first episode of AMI during 2000 to 2006 in 77 Ontario hospitals with >50 annual AMI admissions. Measures:Rates of 30-day and 1-year mortality, readmissions for AMI or death, and major cardiac events (readmissions for AMI, angina, heart failure, or death) within 6 months, according to index hospital cardiac management markers, including appropriate initial emergency department (ED) assessment (rate of high acuity triage) high-acuity and intensity of interventional (30-day cardiac catheterization rate) and medical (discharge statin prescribing rate) therapy. Results:Thirty-day risk-adjusted mortality varied 2.3-fold (7.2%–16.9%) and major cardiac events rates varied 2-fold (18.2%–35.6%) across hospitals in 2006. Patients admitted to hospitals with the highest versus lowest rates of combined medical and interventional management had lower rates of 30-day mortality (adjusted relative rate [aRR] = 0.84, 95% CI, 0.78–0.91), 1-year mortality (aRR = 0.86, 0.81–0.91), AMI readmissions or death (aRR = 0.74, 0.69–0.78), and major cardiac event (aRR = 0.65, 0.61–0.68). Patients admitted to EDs with the highest rates of appropriate initial assessment had lower 30-day (aRR = 0.93, 0.88–0.98) and 1-year mortality (aRR = 0.96, 0.93–1.00). Conclusions:Hospitals with higher levels of both medical and interventional management and higher quality initial ED assessment had better outcomes. Readmissions were particularly sensitive to care processes. In the face of the unwarranted variations in outcomes across hospitals, strategies that promote better ED and inpatient management of AMI patients are needed.

[1]  L. Smeeth,et al.  The Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project (MINAP) , 2010, Heart.

[2]  P. Austin,et al.  Emergency department triage of acute myocardial infarction patients and the effect on outcomes. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[3]  P. Austin,et al.  Use of evidence-based therapies after discharge among elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[4]  J. Tu,et al.  Indicators of quality of care for patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2008, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[5]  S. Normand,et al.  Public reporting of 30-day mortality for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. , 2008, Circulation.

[6]  J. Avorn,et al.  Improvements in long-term mortality after myocardial infarction and increased use of cardiovascular drugs after discharge: a 10-year trend analysis. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data , 2008 .

[8]  Christopher E. Buller,et al.  2007 Focused Update of the ACC/AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2008, Circulation.

[9]  T O'Dowd,et al.  Effectiveness of shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in chronic disease management. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  Simon Capewell,et al.  Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  K. Eagle,et al.  Decline in rates of death and heart failure in acute coronary syndromes, 1999-2006. , 2007, JAMA.

[12]  Elliott S Fisher,et al.  Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods. , 2007, JAMA.

[13]  D. Alter,et al.  Relationship between adherence to evidence-based pharmacotherapy and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 2007, JAMA.

[14]  D. Hoaglin,et al.  Enhancement of claims data to improve risk adjustment of hospital mortality. , 2007, JAMA.

[15]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  A. Jha,et al.  Measuring hospital quality: what physicians do? How patients fare? Or both? , 2006, JAMA.

[17]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short-term mortality. , 2006, JAMA.

[18]  G. Maurer,et al.  Implementation of Guidelines Improves the Standard of Care: The Viennese Registry on Reperfusion Strategies in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Vienna STEMI Registry) , 2006, Circulation.

[19]  Elizabeth R DeLong,et al.  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Association Between Hospital Process Performance and Outcomes Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2022 .

[20]  S. Normand,et al.  An Administrative Claims Model Suitable for Profiling Hospital Performance Based on 30-Day Mortality Rates Among Patients With an Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2006, Circulation.

[21]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA clinical performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop Performance Measures on ST-Elevation and Non-ST-El , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  T. Stukel,et al.  Proliferation of Cardiac Technology in Canada: A Challenge to the Sustainability of Medicare , 2006, Circulation.

[23]  F. L. Lucas,et al.  Temporal Trends in the Utilization of Diagnostic Testing and Treatments for Cardiovascular Disease in the United States, 1993–2001 , 2006, Circulation.

[24]  Peter C. Austin,et al.  Comparing clinical data with administrative data for producing acute myocardial infarction report cards , 2006 .

[25]  R. Collins,et al.  Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins , 2005, The Lancet.

[26]  Robert Parrish,et al.  Guideline-based standardized care is associated with substantially lower mortality in medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: the American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Projects in Michigan. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  A. Jha,et al.  Care in U.S. hospitals--the Hospital Quality Alliance program. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[28]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Routine vs selective invasive strategies in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomized trials. , 2005, JAMA.

[29]  D. Wennberg,et al.  Long-term outcomes of regional variations in intensity of invasive vs medical management of Medicare Patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2005, JAMA.

[30]  Harlan M Krumholz,et al.  Quality Improvement Efforts and Hospital Performance: Rates of Beta-Blocker Prescription After Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2005, Medical care.

[31]  M. Mamdani,et al.  Lipid-lowering therapy with statins in high-risk elderly patients: the treatment-risk paradox. , 2004, JAMA.

[32]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? , 2004, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[33]  Christine Thornton,et al.  Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS): Rural Implementation Statement. , 2003, CJEM.

[34]  J. Boura,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group , 2022 .

[35]  E. Guadagnoli,et al.  Specialty of ambulatory care physicians and mortality among elderly patients after myocardial infarction. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  J V Tu,et al.  Relationship between annual volume of patients treated by admitting physician and mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, JAMA.

[37]  P. Austin,et al.  Long-term MI outcomes at hospitals with or without on-site revascularization. , 2001, JAMA.

[38]  L. Higginson,et al.  Through the looking glass: the cardiac care network of Ontario 10 years later. , 2001, Hospital quarterly.

[39]  J V Tu,et al.  Development and validation of the Ontario acute myocardial infarction mortality prediction rules. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  M A Hlatky,et al.  Variation among hospitals in coronary-angiography practices and outcomes after myocardial infarction in a large health maintenance organization. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[41]  D. Lin,et al.  Cox regression analysis of multivariate failure time data: the marginal approach. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[42]  A Basinski,et al.  Assessment of priority for coronary revascularisation procedures , 1990, The Lancet.

[43]  David A. Schoenfeld,et al.  Partial residuals for the proportional hazards regression model , 1982 .

[44]  E. Rackow.  Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  H. Krumholz,et al.  ACC/AHA 2008 performance measures for adults with ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to develop performance measures for ST-elevation and non-ST-eleva , 2008, Circulation.

[46]  B. Gersh.  Explaining the Decrease in U.S. Deaths from Coronary Disease, 1980–2000 , 2008 .

[47]  G. Lamas,et al.  Focused Update of the ACC / AHA 2004 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction , 2007 .

[48]  M. Bullard,et al.  Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines. , 2004, CJEM.

[49]  J. Richards,et al.  Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2001 Achieving Data Quality in a Statistical Agency: a Methodological Perspective the Data Quality Study of the Canadian Discharge Abstract Database , 2022 .

[50]  C D Naylor,et al.  Assessment of priority for coronary revascularisation procedures. Revascularisation Panel and Consensus Methods Group. , 1990, Lancet.