Weighted informative inverse active class selection for motor imagery brain computer interface

EEG signal is used to establish a communication channel between brain and control device. A common scenario of machine learning based brain computer interface (BCI) is class wise accuracy is different from overall accuracy. Accuracy for one class is worse than overall accuracy. Because, error rates of all classes are not converging in same rate during training of learner. Active class selection (ACS) can be a solution to non-uniform converging of error rates for different classes. ACS determines the class-wise proportion of samples in training set based on empirical error. One of the ACS methods is inverse proportion. It implies that class proportion is inverse of class accuracy. Entropy of unlabeled samples is an active learning (AL) approach of finding the most informative samples. The intuition of this work is to feed the learner with most informative samples maintaining the class proportion given by inverse ACS method. Following this idea, an improved weighted inverse ACS method is developed and combined with AL query concept for BCI. This proposed weighted informative inverse active class selection method has been applied on BCI competition IV motor imagery (MI) binary class data set 2B. It shows better or similar performance on most of the subjects with less amount of training samples. So, this method gives us a way of performance improvement as well as reduction of training samples in BCI.

[1]  G. Pfurtscheller,et al.  A fully automated correction method of EOG artifacts in EEG recordings , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  Qin Tang,et al.  L1-Norm-Based Common Spatial Patterns , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Prediction Interval Construction and Optimization for Adaptive Neurofuzzy Inference Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[4]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.

[5]  Christa Neuper,et al.  Rehabilitation with Brain-Computer Interface Systems , 2008, Computer.

[6]  Nathalie Japkowicz,et al.  The class imbalance problem: A systematic study , 2002, Intell. Data Anal..

[7]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  The Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Non-Medical Uses of BCI Technology , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[8]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Efficient Road Detection and Tracking for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice , 2012 .

[10]  Dongrui Wu,et al.  Collaborative Filtering for Brain-Computer Interaction Using Transfer Learning and Active Class Selection , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Small Sample Size Effects in Statistical Pattern Recognition: Recommendations for Practitioners , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Burr Settles,et al.  Active Learning Literature Survey , 2009 .

[13]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Subject-independent mental state classification in single trials , 2009, Neural Networks.

[14]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  A New Fuzzy-Based Combined Prediction Interval for Wind Power Forecasting , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[15]  Foster J. Provost,et al.  Learning When Training Data are Costly: The Effect of Class Distribution on Tree Induction , 2003, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[16]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Towards Zero Training for Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2008, PloS one.

[17]  Carla E. Brodley,et al.  Active Class Selection , 2007, ECML.

[18]  R. Leeb,et al.  BCI Competition 2008 { Graz data set B , 2008 .

[19]  Jonathan R. Wolpaw,et al.  Brain–Computer InterfacesPrinciples and Practice , 2012 .

[20]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Reducing Calibration Time For Brain-Computer Interfaces: A Clustering Approach , 2006, NIPS.

[21]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition: A Review , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  Minyou Chen,et al.  A batch-mode active learning method based on the nearest average-class distance (NACD) for multiclass brain-computer interfaces , 2014 .

[23]  V. Lawhern,et al.  Improved Neural Signal Classification in a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation Task Using Active Learning. , 2016, IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[25]  F. L. D. Silva,et al.  Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  S. Coyle,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces: a review , 2003 .

[27]  Saeid Nahavandi,et al.  Load Forecasting Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems: Optimal Type Reduction , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[28]  R. Fisher THE USE OF MULTIPLE MEASUREMENTS IN TAXONOMIC PROBLEMS , 1936 .

[29]  Cuntai Guan,et al.  Brain-Computer Interface in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013, J. Comput. Sci. Eng..