Emotions and multimedia learning: the moderating role of learner characteristics

The Cognitive-Affective Theory of Learning with Media postulates that affective factors as well as individual learner characteristics impact multimedia learning. The present study investigated how experimentally induced positive and negative emotions influence multimedia learning and how learner characteristics moderated this impact. Results showed that the group with the negative emotion induction outperformed the group with the positive emotion induction with regard to learning outcome. Cognitive resources (working memory capacity, prior knowledge) and openness to experience were significant predictors for learning. In addition, learners with highest prior knowledge or working memory capacity could compensate the emotional impact on learning. Neuroticism enhanced the emotional impact on learning outcome as a moderator. Lay descriptionWhat is already known about this topic: Emotions and learner characteristics are assumed to influence multimedia learning. There are inconsistent results on emotional impact on multimedia learning. Cognitive resources were shown to be predictors of learning outcomes. There are inconsistent results on how much learners' personality predicts learning. What this paper adds: Negative emotions can lead to higher learning outcomes than positive emotions. Cognitive resources are significant predictors for learning outcomes. Openness to experience predicts learning outcomes. Neuroticism enhances the emotional impact on multimedia learning. Implications for practice and/or policy: Learner characteristics and emotions influence multimedia learning. A very positive emotional state can be harmful to learning. Learners' personality can enhance emotional impact on multimedia learning. Learning environments should be designed to attract learners' curiosity.

[1]  R. Moreno,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Cognitive Load Theory: Historical Development and Relation to Other Theories , 2010 .

[2]  R. Pekrun.  The Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions: Assumptions, Corollaries, and Implications for Educational Research and Practice , 2006 .

[3]  D. Västfjäll.  Emotion induction through music: A review of the musical mood induction procedure , 2001 .

[4]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[5]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[6]  S. Paunonen,et al.  Big Five personality predictors of post-secondary academic performance , 2007 .

[7]  R. Kessels,et al.  The Backward Span of the Corsi Block-Tapping Task and Its Association With the WAIS-III Digit Span , 2008, Assessment.

[8]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[9]  Elizabeth O. Hayward,et al.  Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning , 2014 .

[10]  Charles B. Hodges,et al.  Effects of an emotion control treatment on academic emotions, motivation and achievement in an online mathematics course , 2012 .

[11]  J. Sweller.  Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[12]  D. Watson,et al.  Toward a consensual structure of mood. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Cognitive and affective effects of seductive details in multimedia learning , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Peter E. Doolittle,et al.  Multimedia learning and individual differences: Mediating the effects of working memory capacity with segmentation , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  R. Kessels,et al.  The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: Standardization and Normative Data , 2000, Applied neuropsychology.

[16]  Mark Sadoski,et al.  Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing , 2000 .

[17]  R. Mayer,et al.  Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments , 2007 .

[18]  V. Aleven,et al.  Triggering situational interest by decorative illustrations both fosters and hinders learning in computer-based learning environments , 2014 .

[19]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Do Learner Characteristics Moderate the Seductive-Details-Effect? A Cognitive-Load-Study Using Eye-Tracking , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[20]  A. Isen,et al.  Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving , 1987 .

[21]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[22]  Craig A. Smith,et al.  From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings , 1988 .

[23]  A. Baddeley.  Working Memory, Thought, and Action , 2007 .

[24]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Supporting multimedia learning with visual signalling and animated pedagogical agent: moderating effects of prior knowledge , 2015, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[25]  D. Watson,et al.  On the Dimensional and Hierarchical Structure of Affect , 1999 .

[26]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2005 .

[27]  Michael Lewis,et al.  Shame and Pride and their Effects on Student Achievement , 2014 .

[28]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: THEORY , 2010 .

[29]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Facilitators or suppressors: Effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning , 2016 .

[30]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[31]  Eunjoon Rachel Um,et al.  Emotional design in multimedia learning. , 2012 .

[32]  E. Diener,et al.  Most People Are Happy , 1996 .

[33]  Heather C. Lench,et al.  Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: a meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  H. Ellis,et al.  Irrelevant thoughts, emotional mood states, and cognitive task performance , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Daniel Smilek,et al.  Emotional Valence and Arousal Interact in Attentional Control , 2008, Psychological science.

[36]  R. Vallerand,et al.  On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) , 2000 .

[37]  Tera D. Letzring,et al.  Personality traits and affective states: Relationships with and without affect induction , 2015 .

[38]  Jongpil Cheon,et al.  Emotion and multimedia learning: an investigation of the effects of valence and arousal on different modalities in an instructional animation , 2015 .

[39]  J. Russell.  Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. , 2003, Psychological review.

[40]  R. Moreno,et al.  Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the method-affects-learning hypothesis , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[41]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Emotional design and positive emotions in multimedia learning: An eyetracking study on the use of anthropomorphisms , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[42]  Robert J. Vallerand,et al.  The mediating role of positive and negative affect in the situational motivation-performance relationship , 2013 .

[43]  Peter E. Doolittle.  Multimedia Learning and Working Memory Capacity , 2009 .

[44]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  International handbook of emotions in education. , 2014 .

[45]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Interplay of prior knowledge, self-regulation and motivation in complex multimedia learning environments , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[46]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  The Expertise Reversal Effect , 2003 .