Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Atherosclerotic Internal Carotid Stenosis as the Noninvasive Imaging Modality in Revascularization Decision Making

Background and Purpose— In patients with severe internal carotid artery stenoses, thromboendarterectomy significantly reduces both ischemic stroke and the risk of more ischemic attacks. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the accepted preoperative test to determine whether a high-grade stenosis is present and requires surgical therapy. However, DSA has a procedural risk of stroke between 0.7% and 1%. An accurate, noninvasive imaging protocol with no risk of severe complications would significantly increase the benefit of surgical treatment. The aims of the study were (1) to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) in detecting and grading internal carotid artery stenoses and (2) to assess the misclassification rate of vessels suitable for revascularization by CEMRA. Methods— Ninety-two patients with sonographic evidence of neck vessel stenosis were enrolled in the study. All patients were submitted to CEMRA and DSA. CEMRA images were evaluated for the presence of mild, moderate, or severe stenosis and occlusion. Results— Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 97%, 82%, and 92.5%, respectively. Agreement with DSA was optimal at &kgr;=0.87. The misclassification rate of CEMRA was 3.1% because of its tendency to overestimate the stenosis. Conclusions— The high diagnostic accuracy and limited misclassification rate suggest that CEMRA can be considered a powerful tool for the preoperative, noninvasive evaluation of atherosclerotic pathology of carotid arteries.

[1]  Franz A Fellner,et al.  High-Resolution, Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Elliptical Centric k-Space Ordering of Supra-aortic Arteries Compared With Selective X-Ray Angiography , 2002, Stroke.

[2]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Clinical and radiographic risk factors for operative stroke and death in the European carotid surgery trial. , 2002, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  J. Bamford,et al.  Use of magnetic resonance angiography to select candidates with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis for surgery: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[4]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making , 2001, Neurology.

[5]  M. Bernstein,et al.  High‐resolution intracranial and cervical MRA at 3.0T: Technical considerations and initial experience , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision-making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Authors' reply , 2001 .

[7]  P. Rothwell,et al.  Noninvasive carotid imaging to select patients for endarterectomy , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  K. Kreitner,et al.  Kontrastverstärkte dreidimensionale MR-Angiographie der A. carotis bei 1,0 Tesla im Vergleich zuri.a. DSA - ist die Methode für die Diagnostik von Karotisstenosen geeignet? , 2001 .

[9]  C Barbier,et al.  [Contrast-enhanced MRA of the carotid arteries using 0.5 Tesla: comparison with selective digital angiography]. , 2001, Journal de radiologie.

[10]  K. Kreitner,et al.  [Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid artery at 1.0 Tesla compared to i.a. DSA: is the method suitable for the diagnosis of carotid stenosis?]. , 2001, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[11]  T. Chenevert,et al.  Subclavian MR arteriography: reduction of susceptibility artifact with short echo time and dilute gadopentetate dimeglumine. , 2000, Radiology.

[12]  W. Mali,et al.  Multidirectional depiction of internal carotid arterial stenosis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography versus rotational and conventional digital subtraction angiography. , 2000, Radiology.

[13]  W. Bautz,et al.  Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA and 3D time-of-flight turbo MRA of the carotid arteries: first clinical experiences in correlation with ultrasound, x-ray angiography, and endarterectomy findings. , 2000, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  H. Jäger,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients with carotid artery stenosis: comparison of two different techniques with an unenhanced 2D time-of-flight sequence , 2000, Neuroradiology.

[15]  C. Bartolozzi,et al.  Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography in the assessment of subclavian artery diseases , 2000, European Radiology.

[16]  J. Gauvrit,et al.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a review , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[17]  T. Neumann-Haefelin,et al.  Reliability and validity of noninvasive imaging of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusion. , 1999, Stroke.

[18]  D. Sackett,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Stanton.  Guidelines for Carotid Endarterectomy , 1998 .

[20]  D. Leys,et al.  Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: preliminary results. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[21]  J. Toole,et al.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. , 1998, Circulation.

[22]  J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. , 1998, Journal of insurance medicine.

[23]  T. Hany,et al.  MR-based assessment of vascular morphology and function , 1998, European Radiology.

[24]  T L Chenevert,et al.  The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k‐space acquisition order on three‐dimensional MR angiography image quality , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[25]  K. Kuntz,et al.  Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients--is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis. , 1995, Journal of vascular surgery.

[26]  R. Edelman,et al.  Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography? , 1995, Stroke.

[27]  J. Ricotta,et al.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. , 1995, Circulation.

[28]  D C Harrison,et al.  Dynamic gadolinium‐enhanced three‐dimensional abdominal MR arteriography , 1993, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[29]  W. Krupski.  Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: Comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients , 1992 .

[30]  P. J. Keller,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[31]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  J. Weinreb,et al.  Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients. , 1991, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[33]  J N Lee,et al.  MR fluoroscopy: Technical feasibility , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.