Hypermedia navigation: Differences between spatial cognitive styles

Abstract Recently, many studies have investigated the role of individual and cognitive differences during Web navigation and Web searching. Despite this interest, no works have considered the role may assume individual differences in real-environment navigation during Web navigation. The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of different spatial cognitive styles: Landmark style (LS), Route style (RS) and Survey style (SS), on Web searching behaviour. In real-environment navigation, having a specific style determines the type of information individuals selected to navigate and orient themselves. We hypothesize that LS individuals are less proficient during Web exploration due to their analytical analysis of the environmental features. Vice versa SS individuals will show high performance on Web exploration for their holistic analysis of the World. We asked 30 College Students (10 LS, 10 RS, 10 SS) to solve three Web information tasks. The spatial cognitive style of participants was assessed through the Spatial Cognitive Style Test, and they were also asked to fill in a questionnaire about their internet and computer use. An ad hoc key-logger program for browsers was used to collect Web behaviour measures. In particular, the measures considered were: search engine tools used (e.g. back button), pages visited and revisited, time spent on information searching, and mouse cursor movements. The results showed significant differences between the spatial cognitive styles: LS seems to use a trial and error strategy in order to obtain the relevant information. Differences also emerged in the distribution of mouse cursor movements during Web navigation.

[1]  D. Saucier,et al.  Males and females scan maps similarly, but give directions differently , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[2]  Giuseppe Iaria.  Developmental topographical disorientation: lost every day , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[3]  Min Liu,et al.  The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment , 1994 .

[4]  Francesca Frasca,et al.  Perspective changing in WalCT and VR-WalCT: A gender difference study [WalCT - VR-WalCT: Gender differences] , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  D. Cramer,et al.  Introduction to Statistics in Psychology , 2005 .

[6]  Dian Tjondronegoro,et al.  Modeling users' web search behavior and their cognitive styles , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Edward H. Cornell,et al.  Human Sense of Direction and Wayfinding , 2003 .

[8]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Raffaella Nori,et al.  Navigational Style Influences Eye Movement Pattern during Exploration and Learning of an Environmental Map , 2016, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[10]  C. Cornoldi,et al.  Differenze individuali nella rappresentazione dello spazio e nell'abilità di orientamento: presentazione di un questionario autovalutativo , 2000 .

[11]  Ion Juvina,et al.  Discovery of Individual User Navigation Styles , 2004 .

[12]  Meredith Ringel Morris,et al.  #TwitterSearch: a comparison of microblog search and web search , 2011, WSDM '11.

[13]  Elizabeth R. Chrastil,et al.  Active and passive contributions to spatial learning , 2011, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[14]  Raffaella Nori,et al.  Alignment Effect: Primary – Secondary Learning and Cognitive Styles , 2006, Perception.

[15]  Narushige Shiode,et al.  Digitally united?: a case study on the penetration of wireless and ubiquitous information technologies in Japan , 2004 .

[16]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Web search behavior of Internet experts and newbies , 2000, Comput. Networks.

[17]  L. Piccardi,et al.  Familiarity and Environmental Representations of a City: A Self-Report Study , 2011, Psychological reports.

[18]  George Buchanan,et al.  Improving Web Interaction on Small Displays , 1999, Comput. Networks.

[19]  Jeonghyun Kim,et al.  Describing and predicting information-seeking behavior on the Web , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  David Waller,et al.  The WALKABOUT: Using virtual environments to assess large-scale spatial abilities , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  R. Nori,et al.  Predicting cognitive styles from spatial abilities. , 2006, The American journal of psychology.

[22]  Portia Isaacson,et al.  Microsystems Personal Computing Dissected (there's a Piece for Everyone) , 1977, Computer.

[23]  M. Weiser,et al.  Hot topics-ubiquitous computing , 1993 .

[24]  ThüringManfred,et al.  Hypermedia and cognition , 1995 .

[25]  E. Thompson.  Development and validation of an international English big-five Mini-Markers , 2008 .

[26]  Raffaella Nori,et al.  FAMILIARITY AND SPATIAL COGNITIVE STYLE: HOW IMPORTANT ARE THEY FOR SPATIAL REPRESENTATION? , 2011 .

[27]  Iwan G. J. H. Wopereis,et al.  Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Francesca Pazzaglia,et al.  Perspective, Instruction, and Cognitive Style in Spatial Representation of a Virtual Environment , 2007, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[29]  Karen Littleton,et al.  Gender and Social Comparison Effects in Computer-Based Problem Solving. , 2000 .

[30]  C. Lawton,et al.  Gender Differences in Wayfinding Strategies and Anxiety About Wayfinding: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2002 .

[31]  Reginald G. Golledge,et al.  HUMAN WAYFINDING AND COGNITIVE MAPS , 2003 .

[32]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration , 1991 .

[33]  Francesca Morganti,et al.  Planning optimal paths: A simple assessment of survey spatial knowledge in virtual environments , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[35]  Raffaella Nori,et al.  I believe I’m good at orienting myself… But is that true? , 2015, Cognitive Processing.

[36]  Craig Ross,et al.  Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[37]  Xing Xie,et al.  Efficient browsing of Web search results on mobile devices based on block importance model , 2005, Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications.

[38]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[39]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning , 2006 .

[40]  Michael Koch,et al.  Ubiquitous Computing , 2001, CSCW-Kompendium.

[41]  Jörg M. Haake,et al.  Hypermedia and cognition: designing for comprehension , 1995, CACM.

[42]  Antonella Guidazzoli,et al.  The virtual reality Walking Corsi Test , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Yair Amichai-Hamburger,et al.  Social network use and personality , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  R. Golledge.  Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes , 2010 .

[45]  W. M. Reed,et al.  The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment , 1994 .

[46]  L. Roger Yin.  Dynamic learning patterns: temporal characteristics demonstrated by the learner , 2000 .

[47]  Kyung-Sun Kim,et al.  Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[48]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The mental representation of trait and autobiographical knowledge about the self , 1993 .

[49]  Arthur D. Fisk,et al.  Spatial Ability Subfactors and Their Influences on a Computer-Based Information Search Task , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[50]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems , 1997, J. Documentation.

[51]  Ion Juvina,et al.  Individual Differences and Behavioral Aspects Involved in Modeling Web Navigation , 2004, User Interfaces for All.

[52]  Jean Underwood,et al.  Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[53]  C. Guariglia,et al.  Developmental topographical disorientation in a healthy subject , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Dian Tjondronegoro,et al.  The impact of users’ cognitive style on their navigational behaviors in web searching , 2010, ADCS 2010.

[55]  B. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  THE RELATIONS AMONG WAYFINDING STRATEGY USE, SENSE OF DIRECTION, SEX, FAMILIARITY, AND WAYFINDING ABILITY , 2000 .

[56]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  Developmental topographical disorientation: Case one , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  R. Riding.  On the Nature of Cognitive Style , 1997 .

[58]  G. Iaria,et al.  Lack of orientation due to a congenital brain malformation: A case study , 2005, Neurocase.

[59]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching , 2001 .

[60]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  Towards new forms of knowledge communication: the adaptive dimension of a web-based learning environment , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[61]  C. Lawton.  Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety , 1994 .

[62]  Raffaella Nori,et al.  Cognitive Styles: Errors in Directional Judgments , 2003, Perception.

[63]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Web Search: Public Searching of the Web , 2011, Information Science and Knowledge Management.

[64]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[65]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[66]  Arnold Depickere,et al.  What affect student cognitive style in the development of hypermedia learning system? , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[67]  TjondronegoroDian,et al.  Modeling users' web search behavior and their cognitive styles , 2014 .

[68]  D Waller,et al.  Individual differences in spatial learning from computer-simulated environments. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.