When Designers Are Not in Control - Experiences from Using Action Research to Improve Researcher-Developer Collaboration in Design Science Research

Design science research (DSR) has received much attention in the past few years from the field of information systems This paper argues that control in researcher-developer collaboration during artefact development has not yet received enough attention in design science research even though control is necessary for successful artefact instantiation.Experiences are presented from improving researcher-developer collaboration during DSR by using action research (AR) as means These experiences are driven from the need to achieve meta-design control throughout the development of artefacts by non-researching system developers when DSR is performed in an authentic setting The paper shows that the use of AR to both diagnose uncertainty and actively improve building activities may lead to sustainable improvements in researcher-developer collaboration, and hence achieve meta-design control in DSR performed in authentic development environments, as well as enhance progress in DSR methodology development.

[1]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Design Research in the Technology of Information Systems: Truth or Dare , 2002 .

[2]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development , 2006, End User Development.

[3]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design: Expanding Boundaries and Redistributing Control in Design , 2007, INTERACT.

[4]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Allen S. Lee.  Action is an Artifact , 2007 .

[6]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[7]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[8]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[9]  Miriam Cunningham,et al.  Building the knowledge economy : issues, applications, case studies , 2003 .

[10]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology , 2007 .

[11]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Systems Development in Information Systems Research , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[12]  Fred H. Blum,et al.  Action Research--A Scientific Approach? , 1955, Philosophy of Science.

[13]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Action research and design science research - Seemingly similar but decisively dissimilar , 2009, ECIS.

[14]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007 , 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[15]  John H. Gerdes,et al.  Anonymous mechanisms in group decision support systems communication , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[16]  G. Morgan,et al.  Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. , 1984 .

[17]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  The Sciences of Design: Observations on an Emerging Field , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[19]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  The emergence of design research in information systems in North America , 2008 .

[20]  Mikael Lind,et al.  Co-Design: An Approach to Border Crossing, Network Innovation , 2007 .

[21]  P. Järvinen.  Action Research is Similar to Design Science , 2007 .

[22]  John R. Venable,et al.  A framework for Design Science research activities , 2006 .

[23]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Being Proactive: Where Action Research Meets Design Research , 2005, ICIS.

[24]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[25]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.

[26]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Ken Schwaber,et al.  Agile Software Development with SCRUM , 2001 .

[28]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Activity theory and individual and social transformation. , 1999 .

[29]  Yoris A. Au.  Design Science I: The Role of Design Science in Electronic Commerce Research , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization , 2000 .

[31]  Anke Gericke,et al.  Problem solving patterns in design science research - Learning from engineering , 2009, ECIS.

[32]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  Principles of canonical action research , 2004, Inf. Syst. J..

[34]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[35]  Olov Forsgren,et al.  Integrated Development, Use and Learning in a Co-design Setting: Experiences from the Incremental Deployment of e-Me , 2007 .

[36]  Jeff Conklin,et al.  Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems , 2005 .

[37]  Les Gasser,et al.  A Design Theory for Systems That Support Emergent Knowledge Processes , 2002, MIS Q..

[38]  C. Hogan.  Understanding Facilitation: Theory & Principles , 2002 .