Experimental Investigation of Stress Rate and Grain Size on Gas Seepage Characteristics of Granular Coal

Coal seam gas, held within the inner pores of unmineable coal, is an important energy resource. Gas release largely depends on the gas seepage characteristics and their evolution within granular coal. To monitor this evolution, a series of experiments were conducted to study the effects of applied compressive stress and original grain size distribution (GSD) on the variations in the gas seepage characteristics of granular coal samples. Grain crushing under higher stress rates was observed to be more intense. Isolated fractures in the larger diameter fractions transformed from self–extending to inter-connecting pathways at a critical compressive stress. Grain crushing was mainly caused by compression and high-speed impact. Based on the test results of the original GSD effect, the overall process of porosity and permeability evolution during compression can be divided into three different phases: (1) rapid reduction in the void ratio; (2) continued reduction in the void ratio and large particle crushing; and (3) continued crushing of large particles. Void size reduction and particle crushing were mainly attributed to the porosity and permeability decreases that occurred. The performance of an empirical model, for porosity and permeability evolution, was also investigated. The predictive results indicate that grain crushing caused permeability increases during compression, and that this appeared to be the main cause for the predictive values being lower than those obtained from the experimental tests. The predictive accuracy would be the same for samples under different stress rates and the lowest for the sample with the highest proportion of large grain diameters.

[1]  L. Petrik,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of hydrotalcite from South African Coal fly ash , 2017 .

[2]  Xiexing Miao,et al.  Seepage properties of crushed coal particles , 2016 .

[3]  Richard L. Christiansen,et al.  Measurement of Sorption-Induced Strain , 2005 .

[4]  L. Shadle,et al.  CFD simulation of entrained-flow coal gasification: Coal particle density/sizefraction effects , 2010 .

[5]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  Permeability evolution in fractured coal: The roles of fracture geometry and water-content , 2011 .

[6]  Experimental and Numerical Study on Scale Effects of Gas Emission from Coal Particles , 2016, Transport in Porous Media.

[7]  K. Wolf,et al.  Differential swelling and permeability change of coal in response to CO2 injection for ECBM , 2008 .

[8]  Minggao Yu,et al.  Experimental Investigation on the Permeability Evolution of Compacted Broken Coal , 2016, Transport in Porous Media.

[9]  Xiexing Miao,et al.  Compaction and seepage properties of crushed limestone particle mixture: an experimental investigation for Ordovician karst collapse pillar groundwater inrush , 2015, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[10]  M. Lutyński,et al.  Characteristics of carbon dioxide sorption in coal and gas shale – The effect of particle size , 2016 .

[11]  Yue-min Zhao,et al.  Force characteristic of the large coal particle moving in a dense medium gas–solid fluidized bed , 2014 .

[12]  S. K. Biswal,et al.  Statistical optimization study of jigging process on beneficiation of fine size high ash Indian non-coking coal , 2016 .

[13]  Lei Wang,et al.  Environmental impact of coal mine methane emissions and responding strategies in China , 2011 .

[14]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  The Role of Spatial Variability in Coal Seam Parameters on Gas Outburst Behaviour During Coal Mining , 2008 .

[15]  Mohammad Rezania,et al.  Variations of hydraulic properties of granular sandstones during water inrush : effect of small particle migration , 2017 .

[16]  P. Gayán,et al.  Transport velocities of coal and sand particles , 1993 .

[17]  C. Özgen Karacan,et al.  Prediction of Porosity and Permeability of Caved Zone in Longwall Gobs , 2010 .

[18]  María B. Díaz Aguado,et al.  Control and prevention of gas outbursts in coal mines, Riosa-Olloniego coalfield, Spain , 2007 .

[19]  Sanford E. Thompson,et al.  THE LAWS OF PROPORTIONING CONCRETE , 1907 .

[20]  Andrzej Szlek,et al.  Visualization system for the measurement of size and sphericity of char particles under combustion conditions , 2016 .

[21]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams , 2005 .

[22]  Peter Bayer,et al.  Permeability Evolution in Natural Fractures Subject to Cyclic Loading and Gouge Formation , 2016, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[23]  George V. Chilingar,et al.  Relationship Between Porosity, Permeability, and Grain-Size Distribution of Sands and Sandstones , 1964 .

[24]  Shihui Xu,et al.  Changes of size, ash and density of coal particles on the column axis of a liquid–solid fluidized bed , 2013 .

[25]  A. Busch,et al.  Methane and carbon dioxide adsorption–diffusion experiments on coal: upscaling and modeling , 2004 .

[26]  B. Meyer,et al.  Direct optical observation of coal particle fragmentation behavior in a drop-tube reactor , 2016 .

[27]  Yanbin Yao,et al.  Permeability evolution in fractured coal — Combining triaxial confinement with X-ray computed tomography, acoustic emission and ultrasonic techniques , 2014 .

[28]  A. Busch,et al.  Experimental study of gas and water transport processes in the inter-cleat (matrix) system of coal: Anthracite from Qinshui Basin, China , 2010 .

[29]  Luke D. Connell,et al.  Laboratory characterisation of coal reservoir permeability for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery , 2010 .