New light-amplifier-based detector designs for high spatial resolution and high sensitivity CBCT mammography and fluoroscopy

New cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) mammography system designs are presented where the detectors provide high spatial resolution, high sensitivity, low noise, wide dynamic range, negligible lag and high frame rates similar to features required for high performance fluoroscopy detectors. The x-ray detectors consist of a phosphor coupled by a fiber-optic taper to either a high gain image light amplifier (LA) then CCD camera or to an electron multiplying CCD. When a square-array of such detectors is used, a field-of-view (FOV) to 20 x 20 cm can be obtained where the images have pixel-resolution of 100 μm or better. To achieve practical CBCT mammography scan-times, 30 fps may be acquired with quantum limited (noise free) performance below 0.2 μR detector exposure per frame. Because of the flexible voltage controlled gain of the LA's and EMCCDs, large detector dynamic range is also achievable. Features of such detector systems with arrays of either generation 2 (Gen 2) or 3 (Gen 3) LAs optically coupled to CCD cameras or arrays of EMCCDs coupled directly are compared. Quantum accounting analysis is done for a variety of such designs where either the lowest number of information carriers off the LA photo-cathode or electrons released in the EMCCDs per x-ray absorbed in the phosphor are large enough to imply no quantum sink for the design. These new LA- or EMCCD-based systems could lead to vastly improved CBCT mammography, ROI-CT, or fluoroscopy performance compared to systems using flat panels.

[1]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Conical Rotating Aperture Geometries In Digital Radiography , 1981, Other Conferences.

[2]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Rapid scanning beam digital radiography , 1983 .

[3]  David Gur,et al.  X-Ray Imaging With Two-Dimensional Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Arrays , 1984, Medical Imaging.

[4]  P. Couturier.  Japan , 1988, The Lancet.

[5]  David Gur,et al.  Digital x-ray imaging with two-dimensional charge-coupled device arrays , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[6]  H Liu,et al.  Charge-coupled device detector: performance considerations and potential for small-field mammographic imaging applications. , 1992, Medical physics.

[7]  Brian P. Allen.  Application of CCDs to digital x-ray mammography , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Analysis of signal propagation in optically coupled detectors for digital mammography: II. Lens and fibre optics. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  D. P. Trauernicht,et al.  System considerations in CCD-based x-ray imaging for digital chest radiography and digital mammography. , 1997, Medical physics.

[10]  Scott T. Smith,et al.  Parallel hardware architecture for CCD-mosaic digital mammography , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[11]  Hua Qian,et al.  CCD-based detector for full-field digital mammography , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[12]  M B Williams,et al.  Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography. , 1999, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[13]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image quality evaluation of a selenium-based flat-panel digital x-ray detector system based on animal studies , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[14]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  Region of interest (ROI) microangiography: imager development , 2000, Medical Imaging.

[15]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[16]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Direct conversion flat panel detector for region-of-interest angiography , 2001 .

[17]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Micro-angiographic detector with fluoroscopic capability , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. I. Experimental evaluation and feasibility. , 2003, Medical physics.

[19]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. II. Cascade model analysis. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  Steven K. Onishi,et al.  Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype. , 2004, Medical physics.

[21]  Goran Ristic,et al.  X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators. , 2004, Medical physics.

[22]  F. Beekman,et al.  Photon-counting gamma camera based on an electron-multiplying CCD , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[23]  Richard E. Colbeth,et al.  Multiple-gain-ranging readout method to extend the dynamic range of amorphous silicon flat-panel imagers , 2004, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  T R Nelson,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[25]  Daniel R. Bednarek,et al.  MO‐D‐I‐611‐04: Region‐Of‐Interest (ROI) Computed Tomography: Combining Dual Resolution XRII Images , 2005 .

[26]  Chris C. Shaw,et al.  Cone-beam CT breast imaging with a flat panel detector: a simulation study , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[27]  Stephen J. Glick,et al.  The importance of modeling normal mammographic structure in optimizing flat-panel CT breast imaging systems , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  A prototype micro-angiographic fluoroscope and its application in animal studies , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[29]  F. Beekman,et al.  Photon-counting versus an integrating CCD-based gamma camera: important consequences for spatial resolution , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Thomas R. Nelson,et al.  Performance assessment of a pendant-geometry CT scanner for breast cancer detection , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[31]  Yong Yu,et al.  Evaluation of flat panel detector cone beam CT breast imaging with different sizes of breast phantoms , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[32]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Design and development of a fully 3D dedicated x-ray computed mammotomography system , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.