Resolution uniformity and sensitivity of the NIH ATLAS small animal PET scanner: comparison to simulated LSO scanners without depth-of-interaction capability

Positron emission tomography (PET) scanners designed to image animals the size of rats and mice should possess simultaneously high and uniform spatial resolution and high sensitivity. ATLAS (Advanced Technology Laboratory Animal Scanner), a 6.0 cm diameter effective transverse field-of-view (FOV), 2 cm axial FOV ring-type research scanner seeks these goals by surrounding the animal with eighteen 15 mm deep, LGSO (7 mm)/GSO (8 mm) phoswich detector modules. A Monte Carlo simulation was used to compare the variation of resolution across the FOV and the absolute central point source sensitivity (ACS) of ATLAS to similar systems comprised only of LSO arrays of different depths with no depth-of-interaction (DOI) capability. For ATLAS radial spatial resolution deteriorated by 27% from the center to 3 cm off-axis. Scanners comprised of 15 mm deep, 10 mm deep and 7 mm deep LSO crystals deteriorated by 100%, 51%, and 20%, respectively, over the same distance. Simulated ACS (absorbed energies /spl ges/250 keV) for ATLAS was 2.0% and for the 15 mm, 10 mm deep and 7 mm deep LSO scanners 2.4%, 1.5%, and 0.9%, respectively. Radial resolution loss 3 cm off-axis and ACS measured for the actual ATLAS scanner were similar to the values obtained by simulation (27% resolution loss, 1.8% ACS). The phoswich design thus achieves good resolution uniformity over a 6 cm FOV while preserving sensitivity compared to equivalent non-DOI LSO scanners with a range of crystal depths.

[1]  V. G. Zavarzin,et al.  A 500 k event/sec 12-bit ADC system with high-speed buffered PCI interface , 1998 .

[2]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Continuous-slice PENN-PET: a positron tomograph with volume imaging capability. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Michael V. Green,et al.  Depth identification accuracy of a three layer phoswich PET detector module , 1999 .

[4]  Ariela Sofer,et al.  Evaluation of 3D reconstruction algorithms for a small animal PET camera , 1996 .

[5]  Magnus Dahlbom,et al.  Parallax correction in PET using depth of interaction information , 1997, 1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[6]  J. Seidel,et al.  Correction to "Performance Characteristics Of A Compact Position-sensitive LSO Detector Module" , 1999 .

[7]  J. Seidel,et al.  Evaluation of 3D reconstruction algorithms for a small animal PET camera , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[8]  M. Rafecas,et al.  A Monte Carlo study of high resolution PET with granulated dual layer detectors , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[9]  J. Seidel,et al.  Experimental estimates of the absolute sensitivity of a small animal PET scanner with depth-of-interaction capability , 2000, 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149).

[10]  Karsten P. Ulland,et al.  Vii. References , 2022 .

[11]  S. Cherry,et al.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Jürgen Seidel,et al.  Performance characteristics of a compact position-sensitive LSO detector module , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.