Doctors often ask patients to recall recent health experiences, such as pain, fatigue, and quality of life.1 Research has shown, however, that recall is unreliable and rife with inaccuracies and biases.2 Recognition of recall's shortcomings has led to the use of diaries, which are intended to capture experiences close to the time of occurrence, thus limiting recall bias and producing more accurate data.3
The rationale for using diaries would be undermined if patients failed to complete diaries according to protocol. In this study we used a newly developed paper diary that could objectively record when patients made diary entries in order to compare patients' reported and actual compliance with diary keeping. For comparison, we also used an electronic diary designed to enhance compliance in order to assess what compliance rates might be achieved.
We recruited 80 adults with chronic pain (pain for ≥3 hours a day and rated ≥4 on a 10 point scale) and assigned 40 to keeping a paper …
[1]
M A Hlatky,et al.
Clinical data bases. Accomplishments and unrealized potential.
,
1985,
Medical care.
[2]
M. Hyland,et al.
Diary keeping in asthma: comparison of written and electronic methods.
,
1993,
BMJ.
[3]
John Garcia and Andrew R. Gustavson.
The Science of Self-Report
,
1997
.
[4]
E. McGlynn.
Health information systems : design issues and analytic applications
,
1998
.
[5]
N. Black.
High-quality clinical databases: breaking down barriers
,
1999,
The Lancet.
[6]
J. Fahrenberg,et al.
Progress in Ambulatory Assessment
,
2001
.
[7]
T. Revenson,et al.
Handbook of Health Psychology
,
2001
.