Computationally efficient, numerically exact design space derivatives via the complex Taylor's series expansion method

Abstract Within numerical design optimization, discrete sensitivity analysis is often used to estimate the derivative of an objective function with respect to the design variables. Discrete sensitivity analysis estimates these derivatives by taking advantage of additional derivative information available in an implicit computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver of the discretized governing partial differential equations. The key benefits of steady-state discrete sensitivity analysis are its computational efficiency and numerical accuracy. More recently, the complex Taylor's series expansion (CTSE) method has been used to generate these design space derivatives to machine accuracy, by analyzing a complex perturbation of the objective function. For fortran codes, this method is quite easy to implement, for both implicit and explicit codes; unfortunately, the CTSE method can be quite time consuming, because it requires a complex solution of the governing partial differential equations. In this paper, the authors demonstrate that the direct formulation of discrete sensitivity analysis and the CTSE method solve the same iterative sensitivity equation , which sheds light on the most efficient use of the CTSE method. Finally, these methods are demonstrated via application to numerical simulations of one-dimensional and two-dimensional open-channel flows.

[1]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Essential Elements of Computational Algorithms for Aerodynamic Analysis and Design , 1997 .

[2]  R L Stockstill,et al.  Finite-Element Model for High-Velocity Channels , 1995 .

[3]  A. Jameson,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Complex Aircraft Configurations via an Adjoint Formulation , 1996 .

[4]  Gene Hou,et al.  An approximately factored incremental strategy for calculating consistent discrete aerodynamic sensitivity derivatives , 1992 .

[5]  T. Barth,et al.  An unstructured mesh Newton solver for compressible fluid flow and its parallel implementation , 1995 .

[6]  Christian Bischof,et al.  Adifor 2.0: automatic differentiation of Fortran 77 programs , 1996 .

[7]  George Trapp,et al.  Using Complex Variables to Estimate Derivatives of Real Functions , 1998, SIAM Rev..

[8]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Navier-Stokes Equations on Unstructured Meshes Using Complex Variables , 2001 .

[9]  V. Korivi,et al.  Discrete shape sensitivity equations for aerodynamic problems , 1991 .

[10]  A. Jameson,et al.  Control theory based airfoil design for potential flow and a finite volume discretization , 1994 .

[11]  Paul D. Hovland,et al.  Automatic Differentiation and Navier-Stokes Computations , 1998 .

[12]  R. Berger,et al.  Efficient, Robust Design Tool for Open-Channel Flow , 2001 .

[13]  P. D. Frank,et al.  A comparison of two closely-related approaches to aerodynamic design optimization , 1991 .

[14]  V. Korivi,et al.  Sensitivity analysis, approximate analysis, and design optimization for internal and external viscous flows , 1991 .

[15]  W. K. Anderson,et al.  Airfoil Design on Unstructured Grids for Turbulent Flows , 1999 .

[16]  Arthur C. Taylor,et al.  AERODYNAMIC DESIGN SENSITIVITIES BY AUTOMATIC DIFFERENTIATION , 1998 .